沈阳看脂溢性脱发贵吗沈阳清除腋臭手术多少钱,沈阳灰指甲那家医院便宜,沈阳肤康皮肤病医院治皮肤科评价好么专不专业,沈阳肤康皮肤病医院治皮肤科口碑如何专不专业,沈阳肤康青春痘医院在哪,沈阳治疗皮肤科的哪个医院好,治疗扁平疣到沈阳哪家医院好

Sports gambling giant DraftKings is reviewing a former "Bachelor” contestant's million win in an online fantasy football contest after she and her husband are accused of cheating. Jade Roper-Tolbert beat more than 100,000 entries to take the top prize in DraftKings' "Millionaire Maker" contest this past weekend. But some complained she'd colluded with her husband, Tanner Tolbert, who is a prolific fantasy sports player and fellow “Bachelor” alum. The couple submitted 300 entries into the contest, nearly all of them listing a unique lineup of players from the NFL’s four wild-card games. 607

Rapid City, S.D. — South Dakota has a meth problem, and it wants you to know about it.The state came out with a new slogan last week, and it's got people buzzing. “It’s everywhere, it’s in Rapid City, it’s in small-town South Dakota. It’s in Belle Fourche, it’s in Buffalo," said Bryan Hentkowski, who is recovering from his meth addiction. “It touches everybody, in one way or the other,” said Tim Kelly, who lives in Rapid City, South Dakota. “Your neighbors are doing it, people’s parents are doing it, it’s everywhere,” Hentkowski said.Hentkowski lives in Rapid City, South Dakota. He is in rehab recovering from his meth addiction — and he’s far from the only one. Meth arrests in South Dakota have tripled since 2013. But the state's not ignoring the problem. In fact, they’re on it. The state's new slogan show's people saying, "I'm on meth," and, "I'm on meth too." There’s no doubt the state's new campaign is effective. people are buzzing about it from coast to coast. “It did in 24 hours what we’ve been trying to do for several years and that is, raise awareness of the methamphetamine crisis in South Dakota,” said Kevin Thom, the sheriff in Pennington County. He likes the campaign. "You know some of it is kind of mean spirited, the comments, frankly there’s some pretty hilarious and creative memes that are out there on the internet. I think it’s clearly a net positive,” Thom said. “It’s free, it’s free when people are talking about you on social media and advertising cost a lot of money,” said Vicki Lane, a professor of marketing at University of Colorado Denver. She says the state is using a controversial slogan to get people talking about the problem. “Controversy in particular has a risk that it will backfire. Because it is controversial that people will have a negative perception or negative reaction or negative attitude and maybe even a negative emotion,” Lane said. And there's definitely some of that to be found in Rapid City. “Do you want my honest opinion? I think it's stupid," Hentkowski said. “The PR man ... he was probably on meth when he did it,” said Joe Utter, who lives in Rapid City. “Could be a stroke of genius to get people talking about it, but on the other hand, it’s gonna make us look a little stupid," Kelly said. “Initially, I thought it was pretty ridiculous, it does stop and make you think. There is a meth problem in South Dakota,” said Kristin Kirsch, from Spearfish, South Dakota. Broadhead, the company that created the campaign for the state, said in a statement, “We are proud of this work, and as far as we’re concerned, the campaign is doing its job. It’s generating conversation, it’s soliciting all kinds of reactions and, yes, it’s making people uncomfortable.” While the conversation might be getting started for people at home, it’s been the reality for a while for Pennington County Deputy Dustin Meyer. “We’re going to go serve some warrants on some subjects that are felony drug charges, specifically possession of methamphetamine,” Meyer said. The Pennington County sheriff's department averaged 23 meth arrests a week last year, a third of the total arrests in the state. Thom appreciates the hard work of his deputies, but he knows it’s not the answer. “A stronger focus on the prevention, a stronger focus on the treatment," Thom said. "I mean, you have to have vigorous enforcement, and we’ve done a good job because we’re arresting people in record numbers, but it hasn’t put a dent in the problem.” 3505

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was discharged from the hospital on Tuesday and is recuperating at home after undergoing surgery, according to a court spokesperson."Justice Ginsburg was discharged from the hospital yesterday and is recuperating at home," said Kathy Arberg, public information officer for the Supreme Court, in an email to reporters. 371

Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has expressed reluctance to him testifying publicly in front of the House Judiciary Committee, according to sources familiar with the matter.The special counsel's team has expressed the notion that Mueller does not want to appear political after staying behind the scenes for two years and not speaking as he conducted his investigation into President Donald Trump. One option is to have him testify behind closed doors, but sources caution numerous options are being considered in the negotiations between the committee and the special counsel's team.Justice officials are generally supportive of how the special counsel's team is proceeding with negotiations. As Attorney General Bill Barr told The Wall Street Journal last week: "It's Bob's call whether he wants to testify."Special counsel spokesman Peter Carr and the Justice Department declined to comment on the current status of negotiations.House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, a New York Democrat, has repeatedly said that Mueller must appear publicly, and he will subpoena Mueller if necessary."Eventually we will hear from Mueller because ... we will subpoena him if we have to," Nadler told CNN earlier this month. "I certainly hope it doesn't come to the, to our necessity to subpoena him," he added.Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, suggested at Tuesday's hearing, a meeting where former White House counsel Don McGahn did not appear after being subpoenaed, that Democrats appeared to have a lack of urgency scheduling Mueller's testimony."We've subpoenaed the documents, we've subpoenaed the underlying documents, we've subpoenaed stuff that we can't get, but the one thing that we seem to avoid is Mr. Mueller himself, the one who wrote it," Collins said. "We've asked since April about Mr. Mueller coming. But every time we seem to get close to Mueller, Mueller just gets pushed on a little bit. Haven't seen a subpoena here, and this is what's really amazing -- we'll get back to subpoenas in a moment -- but just think about that. You wanted the work of the author, but you don't want to talk to the author."After the hearing, Collins would not say whether he'd support a subpoena for Mueller's testimony.Separately, Nadler told CNN's Chris Cuomo on Monday he doesn't know what's keeping Mueller as an employee of the Justice Department, suggesting he was "more subject to their discipline" than he would be as a private citizen. "The report is finished. I don't know why he is still there," Nadler said.Mueller has been seen arriving for work almost every morning since the report was released in April.The Justice Department has not commented on what work still remains. 2726

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer put forth a number of amendments to rules set forth by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, setting the table for President Donald Trump's removal trial over the next few weeks. All 11 amendments put forth so far on Tuesday have been tabled -- effectively turning them down -- by a party-line vote in all but one vote. Fifty-three Republicans voted to table the amendments, while 47 Democrats voted against tabling in 10 of the 11 votes. The only exception was on Amendment No. 1293 when Republican Susan Collins voted against tabling the motion.McConnell said at the onset of Tuesday's session that the GOP would block votes on all amendments to the rules put forth by him. "If a senator moves to amend the resolution in order to subpoena specific witnesses or documents, I will move to table such motions because the senate will decide those questions later in the trial," McConnell said. But Schumer continued on with a series of amendments. "These amendments are not dilatory," Schumer said. "They only seek one thing, the truth. That means relevant documents, relevant witnesses. That's the only way to get a fair trial and everyone in this body knows it. All 15 that were brought to completion feature witnesses, every single one. The witnesses we request are not Democrats. They're the president's own men."Here is what the Senate has voted on so far today:Amendment No. 1284This amendment would have compelled documents via subpoena from the White House to be used in the Senate trial. Amendment No. 1285This amendment would have compelled documents via subpoena from State Department to be used in the Senate trial. Amendment No. 1286This amendment would have compelled documents via subpoena from the Office of Budget and Management to be used in the Senate trial.Amendment No. 1287This amendment would have issued a subpoena for the testimony for White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.Amendment No. 1288This amendment would have compelled documents via subpoena from the Department of Defense to be used in the Senate trial.Amendment No. 1289This amendment would have issued a subpoena for the testimony for White House aide Rob Blair and Office of Budget and Management official Michael DuffeyAmendment No. 1290This amendment would have prevented the selective admission of evidence and to provide for appropriate handling of classified and confidential materialsAmendment No. 1291This amendment would have issued a subpoena for the testimony for former National Security Adviser John Bolton.Amendment No. 1292This amendment would have required motions to subpoena witnesses or documents shall be in order after the question period.Amendment No. 1293This amendment would have given additional time for House managers and Trump's legal team to file their responses to motions.Amendment No. 1294This amendment would have required Chief Justice Roberts to rule on motions to subpoena witnesses and documents.The documents requested by Democrats would have included emails, text messages, notes and other communications between White House and other government officials.After nearly 13 hours, the Senate finally voted to approve rules put forth by McConnell to lay out rules and a schedule for the trial. One point of contention was on the schedule for arguments. Originally, McConnell proposed 48 hours of opening arguments, 24 hours by the two respective legal teams, split over four days. After some criticism from Democrats, McConnell altered his proposal to splitting the arguments over six days, giving each team three days each.Another was on how evidence would be accepted by the Senate. 3652