沈阳哪家中医看脱发好-【沈阳肤康皮肤病医院】,decjTquW,沈阳做一侧腋臭要多少钱,沈阳胳肢窝腋臭治疗得多少钱,沈阳哪家中医看风疹团,沈阳治疗狐臭手术要多少钱,沈阳什么医院医疗腋臭好一些,沈阳治疗毛囊炎选那个医院

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A pathologist testified Monday at a Navy SEAL's murder trial that a wounded Islamic State militant in Iraq could have died from a stabbing described by other witnesses.Dr. Frank Sheridan said he couldn't determine a cause of death because there was no body and a lack of other evidence.The testimony at the trial of Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher, though, countered a statement offered last week by another SEAL who stunned the court when he confessed to the killing.Corey Scott testified Thursday that he killed the victim by plugging his breathing tube after Gallagher unexpectedly stabbed the fighter while treating him for injuries suffered in an air strike outside Mosul in 2017.Scott testified that the militant, described as an adolescent boy, would have survived the stabbing.But Scott said he decided to asphyxiate him because he assumed he would later be tortured and killed by Iraqi forces who captured him and brought him to the Navy medics for treatment.Gallagher, 40, is charged with murder in the killing of the boy and attempted murder for allegedly gunning down civilians from his sniper's post.He has pleaded not guilty and his lawyers blame his former troop mates for fabricating the accusations to get Gallagher ousted from the special forces because they didn't like his tough leadership.Scott and another SEAL said Gallagher had initiated medical treatment for the boy and then stabbed him one to three times in the neck for no apparent reason.Gallagher later texted a photo of the corpse to friends with the following message: "Good story behind this, got him with my hunting knife."His lawyers said the message was an attempt at dark humor.Sheridan based his testimony on witness accounts and video of the wounded war prisoner before the alleged knifing.After the boy was wounded in an air strike — more than an hour before he was brought to the U.S. forces for treatment — he was interviewed by an Iraqi TV news crew. He appeared lucid and did not have significant hemorrhaging, Sheridan said."He's clearly responsive," Sheridan said. "There's no sign he's bleeding from any wound."Witnesses at the scene said Gallagher treated the boy for a leg wound and an apparent collapsed lung. The patient was sedated and given a breathing tube for a wound they believe occurred from the air strike blast.He was breathing normally after the procedure when Gallagher suddenly pulled out his personal knife and stabbed him in or near the neck, witnesses said.Depending on the location of the stab wounds, he could have died from profuse internal or external bleeding, Sheridan said. But he couldn't make that determination."I can't give an opinion on the cause of death," Sheridan said. "There just isn't enough evidence."___Melley reported from Los Angeles. 2807
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah - Misinformation comes in many forms, but some can be harder to spot than others.Whether it's sharing a video clip or picture that doesn't tell the whole story, re-posting an article from a non-credible source, or commenting on a social media thread without reading the original post, chances are, most of us have been guilty of doing this at some point.Now, social media companies and the FBI are taking steps to prevent the spread of misinformation like this, especially when it comes to subjects like elections and COVID-19."We established a relationship with social media companies and other technology companies and maintain an open channel and ongoing dialogue with them to share threat information," said Casey Harrington, a supervisory special agent at the FBI's Salt Lake City Division.Here are a few tools that social media sites are making available to help you identify and prevent the spread of misinformation.Twitter is testing a prompt that comes up when you try to retweet an article that you haven't opened before.It will ask you if you would like to open it first.So far, they say they've found that people open articles 40 percent more often after seeing the prompt, and some people have chosen not to share it after opening the article."Make sure you’re getting your news from trustworthy sources, know the origin of your information, and seek out multiple sources so you’re making an informed judgment," said Harrington.Facebook is also doing its part by:Limiting the number of times you can forward a messageTelling you how old an article isSharing where the information is coming fromProviding links to trusted sources when information reviewed by fact-checkers is is found to be falseInstagram, which is now owned by Facebook, will also flag false information and provide an explanation as to why it's not accurate."They ultimately make the decision on the content and the users on their site," Harrington said. "I think the social media companies have recognized, based on past election cycles, what our adversaries and what cybercriminals are able to do, and have taken steps to try to counter that."The difficult thing about false information is it's hard to prosecute criminally."Fake news by itself is not illegal. The FBI cannot initiate an investigation based solely on speech protected by the first amendment. If a foreign adversary or if someone tied in with a foreign intelligence service is the one creating and pushing that information, that is something that we would take action on," said Harrington.So what can you do to prevent the spread of misinformation?Ask yourself these questions before posting or sharing something on social media:Has the story been reported somewhere else?Is it from a reliable source?Has the video or photo been taken out of context?If you're not sure, then there's a chance it's fake and it could do more harm than good if you share it.If you come across something that you think is false information, you can report it to the social media platform you found it on, which stops it from spreading further.This story was first reported by Jordan Hogan at KSTU in Salt Lake City, Utah. 3178

SAN DIEGO — An Uber driver escaped from his car after it plunged into San Diego Bay Thursday night.San Diego Harbor Police said the incident occurred at around 10:30 p.m. local time. The driver was on his way to pick up a customer on Harbor Island when he arrived at a T-intersection at a high rate of speed, causing him to drive off the road and into the water. 375
SAN DIEGO (AP) — The San Diego Padres are bringing some serious swagger and talent to their first postseason appearance in 14 years, against their old nemesis, the St. Louis Cardinals.Led by 21-year-old Fernando Tatis Jr., Manny Machado and Wil Myers, the Padres will host the St. Louis Cardinals in Game 1 of a best of three wild-card series on Wednesday.First pitch is set for 2:08 p.m., and the game will air on ESPN2.Says Tatis: "Man, we're good."The star shortstop was only 8 years old when the Friars last made the postseason in 2006. That season, San Diego won the National League West Division and faced the Cardinals in the Division Series.The Cards beat the Padres 3-1, and they eventually took home the World Series championship by defeating the Detroit Tigers.St. Louis will start left-hander Kwang Hyun Kim (3-0, 1.62 ERA), who pitched at Petco Park for Korea in the 2009 World Baseball Classic.San Diego will counter with right-hander Chris Paddack (4-5, 4.73), who has had a seesaw season.Numbers to know heading into the series:St. Louis Cardinals (30-28, second in the NL Central) vs. San Diego Padres (37-23, second in the NL West)The Padres are 21-11 on their home turf; the Cardinals have gone 16-15 away from home.REGULAR SEASON TOP PERFORMERS: Wil Myers leads the Padres with 31 extra base hits and is batting .288; Tyler O'Neill leads the Cardinals with seven home runs and has 19 RBIs.LAST 10 GAMES: Padres: 5-5, .215 batting average, 3.87 ERA, outscored opponents by three runs; Cardinals: 6-4, .209 batting average, 3.43 ERA, outscored opponents by two runs. 1592
SAFETY HARBOR, Fla. — One of the hottest new cleaning products in the country comes from the naughty minds of two Howard Stern Show all-stars now living in Safety Harbor, Florida. But sorry, we cannot tell you the product’s name here.No, really. The name is kind of dirty.Let's just say it rhymes with “mittens.” If you really want to know, search for “shmittens” on Amazon. We’ll wait...These glove-shaped moist wipes were created a few years ago by a very funny couple: Richie Wilson and Rachel Fine. At first, the wipes were the perfect, cheeky Christmas stocking stuffer. “The name is what opens the doors,” says Richie, who says you can use his invention for cleaning babies, dogs or even office desks. “But once you see the use behind it, you realize it’s more than a gag gift.”Indeed! The wipes have gone viral recently. They appeared on a National Geographic special as a favorite of the military. After that, UNILAD, Good Housekeeping, Redbook and Yahoo News all chimed in.“We have a lot of people who send them overseas to the military,” says Rachel. “They don’t have access to showers all the time. They’re covered in sand.”With millions of clicks, the whimsical wipes sold out. They are now available again on Amazon, retailing for about a pack.For Richie, who made his name on one of the most popular radio shows in the world, the must-have cleaning product is bringing him a whole new fan base. “When I was on the Stern show, I had a certain type of audience,” Richie says laughing. “Now I’m on mom blogs!” 1562
来源:资阳报