昌吉怀孕几天能被测出(昌吉市医院正规男科) (今日更新中)

TONAWANDA, N.Y. — Less than a week after baby Carter Dominguez was brought into the world, baby and mom are enjoying time at their Tonawanda, New York, home. It’s the journey here, and it's what Elizabeth ate before she gave birth that’s made this new mom experience anything but easy. “I just want everyone to know that this can happen,” she said. “I don’t want it to happen to anyone else.” When Elizabeth Dominguez went into labor, she was asked for a urine sample. “I did a urine test and it came back that I tested positive for opiates,” she said. “I called my husband freaking out saying, ‘how is this possible?’ I don’t do drugs." Her husband, Mark Dominguez, asked what she had to eat that day. “And I told him a bagel and a sub," she said. "That’s all I had. He told me it must be from the bagel.” The new mom had eaten a bagel covered in poppy seeds. Poppy seeds are derived from the opium plant. “In some cases eating a large amount of poppy seeds, such as the kind found in a bagel, has been shown to produce low levels of morphine and codeine in the urine,” said Michelle Rainka, a clinical pharmacist at DENT Neurologic Institute. “Potentially those seeds have not been washed and can contain that.” Rainka says anyone about to take a drug test should know this. “Anywhere from one to three bagels with poppy seeds can produce positive tests on a urine toxicology,” Rainka said. Elizabeth Dominguez gave birth later that day, and her baby’s tests for opiates came back negative. Still, the hospital monitored Carter for withdrawal and because she failed the drug test, hospital staff followed protocol and called Child Protective Services. She was discharged but Carter had to stay, separating mom and baby less than 24 hours after birth. “I felt absolutely horrible,” she said. “I felt like a terrible mother leaving him. I just want everyone to know that this could happen. It’s such a terrible thing and I don’t want it to happen to anyone.” Reports show she did have a false positive because of the poppy seed bagel. 2048

They're the hallmark of vaping — the massive clouds that sometimes come in different shapes.But how does a little e-liquid become those clouds?We're going inside an e-cigarette to find out.The devices usually have four main parts: a reservoir that holds e-liquid, a battery, a heating element and a mouthpiece.The first step is to add e-liquid to the reservoir or to attach a pre-made cartridge.The liquid is made of nicotine, flavoring, vegetable glycerin and propylene glycol. You’ll find propylene glycol in things like inhalers and fog machines. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says it’s all safe.Next, the battery warms up the heating element and that vaporizes the e-liquid. The vapor travels through the e-cigarette, out the mouthpiece and into the lungs.When exhaled, the vapor vanishes into the air fairly quickly.The heat is low enough that it doesn't combust — or burn — the liquid.Supporters say vaporizing creates fewer dangerous compounds than combustion.The American Cancer Society says vapor can still contain harmful chemicals or substances, like volatile organic compounds, or VOCs.They cause inflammation and can make the kidneys, liver or nervous system fail.According to the American Cancer Society, vapor can also contain harmful flavoring chemicals and formaldehyde. 1312

The studio and network behind Fox's "Empire" say they are considering their options, following the arrest of television actor Jussie Smollett."We understand the seriousness of this matter and we respect the legal process," 20th Century Fox Television and Fox Entertainment said in a statement to CNN on Thursday. "We are evaluating the situation and we are considering our options."The company's statement came hours after Smollett was arrested on 459

The Trump administration is headed for a budget clash with Congress, with calls for deep domestic spending cuts that lawmakers are likely to ignore as the nation's debt reaches record levels.On Monday, President Donald Trump is set to deliver his first budget roadmap under a divided government with Speaker Nancy Pelosi at the helm of a Democratic-controlled House, and he is expected to face fierce resistance to severe proposed cuts on education, health and environmental protections.The White House is proposing a 5% cut across federal agencies, except for defense spending, as part of its budget plan for fiscal year 2020, which begins on October 1. The proposed cuts come just as Congress will need to decide -- yet again this year -- whether to lift spending caps put into place by law in 2011.A White House official confirms Trump will ask for .6 billion for a border wall, and an additional .6 billion in military construction funds to pay back monies that the administration hopes will be spent this year that the President redirected by executive authority.Congress holds the purse strings of what the government is willing to spend, and Democrats demonstrated their ability to stay unified during the partial government shutdown.House Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, said at a hearing last week that she would fight to ensure robust funding for critical programs overseen by the committee, including reversing steps by the administration to weaken the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau."The Trump administration has also consistently put forth budget proposals that make massive cuts to programs that protect the nation's most vulnerable families," Waters said.Trump has previously proposed deep spending cuts on domestic programs as well as entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security every year of his presidency, and each time Congress has ignored them.The President's proposal, however, may offer clues about the President's desire to get funding for a border wall and whether he will earmark money to repair the nation's roads and bridges as part of an infrastructure deal.The White House official notes that the forthcoming request for wall funding is different than in previous years when the White House asked for wall money from just one funding source: the Department of Homeland Security (more specifically, CBP). This year, the White House will ask for billion from Customs and Border Protection, but will also request .6 billion in military construction funds from the Pentagon.In addition, the budget contains a request for another .6 billion in military construction funds -- but these would be used to "backfill" what the administration hopes to spend this year as a result of the emergency declaration. In other words, the White House is requesting money to pay back the funds that Trump redirected with executive authority, and officials are not counting that sum in the topline number they say they're requesting for the wall (at least .6 billion).The amount of the wall request was 3089

There are creatures that have been in this country longer than man, and there are those that are fighting to make sure they stay as long as man plans to. In the small town of Divide, Colorado there’s a wolf sanctuary called Colorado Wolf and Wildlife center. “We focus on education, conservation and preservation of wolves,” says Darlene Koboble, the CEO and director of Colorado Wolf and Wildlife Center. “I never thought in my wildest dreams I would be working with wolves. It basically started with one wolf-dog that I rescued from a shelter from being euthanized, because she had part wolf in her. When I rescued her, she was my inspiration to be a voice for wolves, because they’ve been one of the most persecuted animals in history.”The gray wolf has been classified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as an endangered species throughout the country since 1978. According to Fish and Wildlife Service, there were only around 1,000 gray wolves at the time, mostly in Minnesota. Today, there are more than 5,000 across the country, but there are disagreements on whether this number defines the population as recovered. “There is a big gap of wolves right now, and that gap is Colorado,” says Rob Edward of the Rocky Mountain Wolf Project (RMWP). “Colorado has one of the biggest deer populations, but it’s missing it’s primary top-level carnivore.”Edward said the RMWP’s primary goal is to introduce the gray wolf back into Colorado, which is on the state’s 2020 ballot. “They are as important to the forest of the west as a wildfire,” Edward says. “Without them, our wild places are impoverish.” In 2011, the gray wolf was dropped from the endangered list in Idaho and Montana. Wyoming also lost federal protections of gray wolves. Now, the Trump administration will seek to end those federal protections nationwide across the whole country. The proposal would give states the authority to hold wolf hunting and trapping seasons.The Associated Press reported Jamie Rappaport Clark, a former director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service now with the group Defenders of Wildlife, warned of an “all-out war on wolves” if the plan advances.“We don’t have any confidence that wolves will be managed like other wildlife,” she says.But government officials countered that the recovery of wolves from widespread extermination last century has worked and they no longer need the Endangered Species Act to shield them.Agriculture groups and lawmakers from western states are likely to support the administration’s proposal.“Ranching is a tough life,” says Martin Davis, a ranch owner in Montana. “It’s hard to make a living when you’re against mother nature. I’m a fourth-generation rancher in Paradise Valley, Montana. We’ve been here on the ranch for 45 years. One of the big problems we had was they re-introduced wolves back to Yellowstone. Early on, they were on the endangered species list and we couldn’t do anything but scare them away from our property. We lost live stock to wolves, and we’ve had some neighbors lose horses.” Wolves are now allowed to be hunted in Montana in three different seasons throughout the year. “My life savings is tied up in my cattle,” Davis says. “And when you have something out there stealing your life savings, it’s a hard pill to swallow. I think taking them off the endangered list nationwide has to be done. When that happens, I’m not saying we are going to kill every wolf in the country – that’s not the point. Taking them off the endangered species list is good so the numbers can be managed. I don’t hate wolves, but I can see the argument that they don’t want the wolf to go away again. But I don’t think that’s a worry if they’re managed correctly.”U.S. Fish and Wildlife have until March 2020 to decide if the gray wolf comes off the endangered species list. Officials will take public comments on hearings until July 15. 3887

来源：资阳报