昌吉市哪家妇科医院流产比较好(昌吉怀孕几天有症状吗) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Fire investigators have determined that a blaze that scorched 100 acres in the San Pasqual Valley Monday was not intentionally set.  169

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Hundreds of homeless individuals remain evacuated at SDCCU Stadium after heavy rains flooded an East Village shelter this week, forcing them to leave.Flooding Thursday night overturned portable restroom facilities at the Alpha Project facility, turning the ground into a swamp of feces and human waste and inundating tents meant to house the homeless from the storm.Saturday, those evacuated remained at the Mission Valley stadium. Mayor Kevin Faulconer planned to visit the stadium to meet with those evacuated.RELATED: Hundreds of homeless evacuated as rain floods downtown San Diego shelterHomeless individuals at the stadium were given food and a clean place to sleep, but Red Cross organizers say they need new clothing, blankets, and socks to help replace what was lost. Donations can be brought to SDCCU Stadium's Gate C.Hazmat crews still have to clean up the downtown site as of Saturday. There is no timeline on when the downtown shelter will be reopened or how long the emergency shelter would be in place. 1044

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Governor Gavin Newsom’s vaccine safety task force will have to work quickly once the FDA announces a decision on Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate.The 11-member panel, officially called the Scientific Safety Review Workgroup, has been tasked with reviewing the safety and efficacy of vaccine trials and rendering a recommendation on their use in California.The workgroup has a difficult mission: review the data thoroughly enough to offer a recommendation independent from the FDA, but do it fast enough to avoid delaying distribution of the vaccine.Pfizer’s emergency use authorization application spans thousands of pages.The workgroup has already reviewed Pfizer’s early-stage clinical trial data from phases 1 and 2 and found no cause for concern, Governor Gavin Newsom said. They’re still waiting to get their hands on the all-important Phase 3 data, which included thousands of participants.Panel member Dr. Rodney Hood, the president of the Multicultural Health Foundation, acknowledged the task force will have to complete its review of the Phase 3 data “very, very quickly.” Dr. Hood is one of two members from the San Diego region, along with Dr. Mark Sawyer of Rady Children’s Hospital.“We certainly don't want to introduce any unnecessary delay in the vaccine being available to Californians,” Dr. Sawyer said.The FDA has scheduled a meeting of its vaccine advisory committee, known by its acronym VRBPAC (pronounced verb-pack), on Dec. 10. The agency said it will make Pfizer’s Phase 3 data available at least two days before that meeting.At the end of that meeting, a group of about 20 experts on the advisory committee will vote on whether to recommend emergency authorization of the vaccine. The FDA is expected to issue a decision shortly after, although the agency does not have to abide by the advisory committee’s recommendation.“The California committee is on notice to be ready for a meeting either later in the day on the 10th or on December 11,” said Dr. Sawyer.Dr. Sawyer was recently added to VRBPAC, so he will cast a vote on whether to recommend approval of the vaccine at the national level before participating in California’s process.“It is going to take a few days for the vaccine to really start flowing,” he said. “I don't think the [California] committee is going to introduce extra delay.”The California committee has promised to issue its decision within 24 hours of the FDA’s to avoid slowing down distribution, but that means the members may have as few as three days to review the safety and efficacy data.Federal regulators will spend about three weeks reviewing the thousands of pages of data submitted as part of Pfizer’s application. VRBPAC and the California Scientific Safety Review Workgroup will render decisions based on summaries prepared by the FDA, Dr. Sawyer said.Both doctors say they have confidence in the FDA’s process and acknowledge it would be very unlikely for the California workgroup to break with the agency’s recommendation. They said the mission of their review is to add an extra layer of verification after complaints the Trump administration was exercising political pressure on the FDA.“I think the governor foresaw that it was going to be very important that the general community accept these vaccines, assuming they're approved and are safe and effective, because otherwise we're not going to get out of this pandemic,” Dr. Sawyer said.The doctors say they want to make sure that community acceptance extends across all demographics, so they’ll be looking closely at the numbers to see if various ethnic or racial groups had different responses to the vaccine.Based on research on past vaccines, a differential response is not expected, Dr. Hood said. However, COVID-19 does strike Latinos and African-Americans more severely, making vaccine acceptance among minority communities all the more critical.“I want to look at the data, get an assessment of risk-benefit and the question I ask is, would I take it? Number one. Number two, if I would take it, would I recommend it to my family?” he said.The doctors said they will also closely examine reports of side effects.Early data suggests both Pfizer and Moderna’s candidates have somewhat harder-hitting side effects than the typical flu vaccine. Dr. Sawyer compared the side effects to the recent shingles vaccine.“Your arm hurts for a day or two. You may not feel well. You may feel a little bit under the weather for the first 24 hours. You could even have a mild fever or headache,” he said, noting those symptoms typically resolve within 24 to 48 hours based on the data available so far.“That's actually a good sign. You want that to happen,” he added.Those sorts of short-term side effects are signs the body is building a strong immune response. They’re evidence the vaccines work as well as advertised, but the doctors say they won’t know for certain until they review the final numbers. 4949

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Hawaii recently passed a ban on sunscreens containing certain chemicals deemed harmful to their coral reefs.With more than 70 miles of coastline in San Diego County, the question of whether a similar ban could affect our region has been brought to light.The chemicals in question are oxybenzone or octinoxate, both of which are found in many commonly purchased sunscreens.RELATED: What ingredients to avoid, look for in reef-safe sunscreensA study by the Haereticus Environmental Laboratory found the chemicals seep into young coral and lead to coral bleaching, which occurs when an increase in sea temperatures kills the algae that grow inside coral, turning reefs white. This eliminates other nutrients that sustain marine life.Researchers say 14,000 tons of sunscreen lotion gets into reefs around the world every year.We asked our 10News Facebook fans how they would feel about a similar ban in California. At press time, 81 percent said they would support similar legislation in our state:When asked for comment regarding a similar California ban, the Governor's Office told 10News they do not comment on any potential legislation and there is currently no bill in the works.While San Diego doesn't have a robust coral ecosystem, the region is home to scenic coastlines that draw tourists from all over the world and off-shore fishing that fisherman enjoy just the same.RELATED: Hawaii moves to ban certain sunscreens to save coral reefs"The physical block more hitting and going away, the more chemical blockers are causing a chemical reaction," Mark Vierra, a dermatologist in Rancho Bernardo, told 10News. "You think about the old surfer with the white on the nose, people didn't always love that but now they're micronized, so I have a physical block on now and it doesn't look totally white."There are no studies on how sunscreens affect San Diego's coastline, which is home more to kelp forests than coral reefs. For now, Vierra suggests picking one and sticking with it."I always want patients to pick one that they like and they'll use consistently and reapply," Vierra said. "That's probably more important than which individual one you pick." 2214

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Democrats have secured control of two of the most powerful agencies in our region - the city and the county.San Diego will soon have a democratic mayor and an 8 to 1 advantage on the City Council. Couple that with Democrats flipping the County Board of Supervisors after years of Republican control, and it appears a whole new philosophy is on the way."I've been waiting 20 years,” said Nicole Capretz, who heads the Climate Action Campaign. “This is, I mean, decades in the making.”Climate Action Campaign has fought the Republican-controlled Board of Supervisors for years over how it handles the environment, prevailing in court over the county's climate plan.“They've twice had to rescind their climate plan publicly, which is unprecedented,” Capretz said.Capretz said she expects things to change in January, when the board will flip to a 3-2 Democrat advantage. That is expected to shift how the county addresses key issues like the environment, public health, and housing - in other words, no more sprawling back country developments that many times wind up challenged in a public vote.“We have wasted so much energy and so much time debating things that were not legally valid and should not have been done,” said County Supervisor Nathan Fletcher.Meanwhile, over at City hall, the Democrats will expand their veto proof advantage on the city council from 6-3 to 8-1. Republican Chris Cate is now the lone member of the G.O.P. on the council. “I think there needs to be a better job of communicating what we're about here locally as San Diegans, and getting our message out about what we feel is the best role of government in providing services to residents,” Cate said.The city has more than twice as many registered Democrats as Republicans, according to the registrar.San Diego’s new mayor and city council will be sworn in this December.The new board of supervisors will take over in January. 1932

来源：资阳报