胆结石是怎么造成的原因有哪些重庆(重庆去结石的最有效的土方法) (今日更新中)

Federal officials on Wednesday banned electrical shock devices used to discourage aggressive, self-harming behavior in patients with mental disabilities.The announcement from the Food and Drug Administration follows years of pressure from disability rights groups and mental health experts who have called the treatment outdated, ineffective and unethical. The agency first announced its intent to ban the devices in 2016.For years, the shock devices have been used by only one place in the U.S., the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center of Canton, Massachusetts, a residential school for people with autism and other psychiatric, developmental or mental disabilities. The FDA said Wednesday it estimates 45 to 50 people at the school are currently being treated with the device.School administrators have called the shocks a last resort to prevent dangerous behaviors, such as head-banging, throwing furniture or attacking teachers or classmates. The center has continued to use the shock devices under a decades-old legal settlement with the state of Massachusetts, but needs court approval before beginning use on each resident.School officials said in a statement they plan to challenge the government ban in court. A parents’ group also defended the practice and said it would fight the ban.“FDA made a decision based on politics, not facts, to deny this life saving, court-approved treatment,” the school said. Electric shocks and other painful or unpleasant treatments known as “aversive conditioning” were more widely accepted decades ago. But mainstream psychiatry now relies on behavioral modification, prescription drugs and other therapies that have proven more effective.“Through advancements in medical science, there are now more treatment options available to reduce or stop self-injurious or aggressive behavior,” said Dr. William Maisel, a director in the FDA’s device center, in a statement.The Rotenberg school has used shock devices carried in students’ backpacks, which were attached to their arms and legs via electrodes. School staffers could trigger a two-second shock to a patient’s skin by using a remote controller.Some patients from the Rotenberg center have compared the shocks to a bee sting or worse. The school has faced several lawsuits brought by families who said their children were traumatized by the shocks.Other parents say that the technique is the only thing that prevents violent, sometimes life-threatening behavior in their children.“We will continue to fight to keep our loved ones safe and alive and to retain access to this treatment of last resort which has allowed them to live a productive life,” said members of the Rotenberg’s parents association, in a statement. “There is simply no alternative.” The FDA, echoing psychiatric experts, said that the shock therapy can exacerbate dangerous behaviors and lead to depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. Patients have also suffered burns and tissue damage due to the device, the agency said.Regulators said patients should instead receive treatments that focus on eliminating factors that trigger the behaviors or teaching patients coping skills to deal with them. The FDA has only banned two other products in more than 40 years of regulating medical devices -- powdered surgical gloves, which can cause allergic reactions, and fake hair implants, which caused infections and didn’t work. Typically, the FDA addresses safety issues by adding new warning labels or modifying instructions for devices. But the agency concluded that the problems with the shock devices could only be addressed by banning them.___Follow Matthew Perrone on Twitter: @AP_FDAwriter___The Associated Press receives 3717

He says right now chokeholds are not banned in use of force manual, but they are not taught in academy. He is now updating policy to explicitly* ban them.— Madison Carter (@madisonlcarter) June 4, 2020 213

Here are the full remarks from @SenMcSallyAZ, as prepared for the Senate hearing: pic.twitter.com/78khZd1Cj0— ABC15 Arizona (@abc15) March 6, 2019 158

Ford unveiled a fully electric Mustang with over 900 horsepower at a car show in Las Vegas Wednesday. It's not for sale, but the customized Mustang is intended to gauge interest in a high-performance 212

From high-waisted mom jeans to 80s neon shirts and denim overalls, what was once popular can sometimes be a trend again. Remember Crocs? Well, the rubber boat shoes are back in style."They aren't really stylish, or they are kind of ugly,” says 8th-grader Faith Geisinger.However, despite its appearance, Geisinger says Crocs are no longer embarrassing to sport. Everyone her age is wearing them.Crocs are back and more popular than ever thanks to Generation Z, the demographic cohort that follows Millennials."Well, they are just kind of cool and what makes them fashionable are the Jibbitz," Geisinger says.Crocs are ranked no. 13 among most popular footwear brands, but that wasn’t always the case. In 2017, they were no. 30."Crocs has really been focused on keeping the brand or making the brand relevant," says Katie Wagner with Crocs.She believes teens were a big reason for the newfound hype and popularity. There was also big help from celebrity endorsements."Teenagers in particular are really embracing this brand because self-expression is so important," Wagner says.Additionally, the company collaborated with celebrities who teenagers love like Post Malone and Luke Combs.Crocs aren’t the only ones capitalizing on the 90s resurgence. Companies like Fila, Nike and Adidas have brought back the dad sneaker.What you might find ugly, someone else may find fashionable. 1390

来源：资阳报