重庆胆囊结石不手术保守治疗可以吗结石怎么快速排出重庆,为什么会有肾结石重庆,重庆肾结石6mm算大吗,重庆胆结石多大需要做手术,重庆胆结石1.7厘米需要做手术吗,重庆多发性肾结石如何治疗,重庆打结石需要多少钱

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Arrest documents released by St. Petersburg Police Tuesday reveal new details about the interaction between a 12-year-old witness and the 13-year-old boy 189

Rod Rosenstein took aim at James Comey Monday, calling him a "partisan pundit" in prepared remarks for a speech that included the most public retelling yet of the twists and turns of the Russia investigation by the man who oversaw it.Speaking to a group of business and civic leaders in Baltimore, the former deputy attorney general -- just days removed from a tumultuous tenure at the Department of Justice -- recounted how he had prepared a memo in 2017 that supported President Donald Trump's firing of Comey, then the FBI director, and defended his decision to appoint Robert Mueller as a special counsel in the wake of that firing.Rosenstein also responded directly to a barb from the former FBI director, who said at a CNN town hall last week that Rosenstein's character wasn't strong and that his soul had been "eaten" by his time in the Trump administration."Now the former director is a partisan pundit, selling books and earning speaking fees while speculating about the strength of my character and the fate of my immortal soul. That is disappointing," Rosenstein said.In his speech before a crowd of nearly 1,000 people at the annual Greater Baltimore Committee dinner, Rosenstein acknowledged the unusual role he played in the drama of Trump's Washington -- as a Republican held up by the left for stewarding the Mueller probe."People spend a lot of time debating whose side I was on, based on who seemed to benefit most from any individual decision," Rosenstein said. "But trying to infer partisanship from law enforcement decisions is a category error. It uses the wrong frame of reference."On Monday, with the frame of hindsight, Rosenstein told the audience why he disagreed with Comey's handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, and how he put those concerns in a memo at Trump's request.Rosenstein also remembered how he disobeyed Trump's request to include in that memo that Comey had told Trump that he wasn't under investigation -- "because, one, I had no personal knowledge of what the director said, and two, in any event, it was not relevant to my memo" -- and criticized the way the President carried out the firing."If I had been the decisionmaker, the removal would have been handled very differently, with far more respect and far less drama," Rosenstein said.Rosenstein didn't quote Mueller in his evening remarks -- like he did in a separate appearance at the University of Baltimore Law School earlier Monday -- but he did borrow a line from Attorney General Bill Barr, aligning himself with Barr's views on the appointment of special counsels.Rosenstein stood by his decision to appoint Mueller and challenged critics to "explain what they would have done with the details we knew at the time.""As acting attorney general, it was my responsibility to make sure that the Department of Justice would conduct an independent investigation; complete it expeditiously; hold perpetrators accountable if warranted; and work with partner agencies to counter foreign agents and deter crimes. We achieved those goals," Rosenstein said.Still, he expressed his displeasure with the process, noting "I disfavor special counsels.""I am glad that I only needed to appoint one in 25 months," Rosenstein said. 3247

Seattle Seahawks linebacker Bobby Wagner went to a Seattle Safeway grocery store planning to box groceries for nine families as part of a planned charity event. Wagner previously supported the construction of nine "tiny" homes for low income families in Seattle. He was at the Safeway on Tuesday to box up Thanksgiving groceries to continue his support for those families.But Wagner was really in a giving mood. While at the Safeway, Wagner told the store he would pay for everyone's groceries. For 30 minutes, cashiers at the Safeway rang up conveyor belts full of groceries just days before Thanksgiving, with Wagner picking up the tab. To Wagner, the photo op had already ended, and he didn't plan on advertising the good deed. But being a star player for the local NFL team gives one notoriety, and thus quickly the world found out through social media. But by the time news cameras arrived at the Safeway, Wagner was already gone. But on Wednesday, he was asked about what prompted him to spontaneously give back to his fans. “When we were waiting, I saw everyone Thanksgiving shopping and I thought it would be cool if when they went to the cash register they didn’t have to pay,” Wagner told 1211

Roee and Adiel Kiviti have been married almost six years and live in the United States. They are both American citizens, as is their 2-year-old son, Lev. However, they say their infant daughter, Kessem, has been denied birthright citizenship under a State Department policy that considers her "born out of wedlock" — and they're not the first LGBT family to be affected by the policy under the Trump administration.Both children were born in Canada using an egg donor and a surrogate mother. The Kivitis told CNN's Brianna Keilar that it was "a straightforward procedure" to obtain Lev's US passport. This was not the case when they sought to do the same for Kessem in early May."We're a family of four people where three have American citizenship and a 2-month baby that the State Department is refusing her a right to a birthright citizenship," Adiel Kiviti said.The Kivitis said it initially seemed that their daughter's passport application would be processed under the policy for children born abroad of two US parents. However, they were later told her application had been flagged for surrogacy. Under the State Department policy on "assisted reproductive technology," "a child born abroad to a surrogate, whose genetic parents are a U.S. citizen father and anonymous egg donor, is considered for citizenship purposes to be a person born out of wedlock." When asked for comment on the Kivitis' story, a State Department official directed CNN to this operational guidance."We feel that it targets specifically LGBT families," Adiel Kiviti told Keilar on "CNN Right Now.""To be honest, when a straight couple is using surrogacy, or when a straight couple is using an egg donation or sperm donation, nobody asks them if they are the biological parents of the child, it's just an assumption. But when an LGBT family's coming and applying, our application was flagged as surrogacy."The Kivitis said they were asked to provide additional documentation like surrogacy and residency papers."Our position was and remains that we should be treated as a married couple and the minimal requirements that are in that regulation should be applied to us as well," Roee Kiviti told CNN in a separate interview. "Any additional requirements beyond that are discriminatory."He thinks they should be processed under INA301(c) which applies to US children born in wedlock to two US citizen parents.'This is an affront on American families'Roee Kiviti told CNN that it is not just LGBT families who should be concerned about the policy."I think especially after the Supreme Court ruling (legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide), there's no such thing as gay marriage. There's marriage. We are a family," he said."This is not an affront on LGBT families. This is an affront on American families, and it should worry everyone," Roee Kiviti said.A number of Democratic politicians have expressed outrage at the Kivitis' story, which was 2932

Saturday marks the "First in the West" nomination race with Democrats in Nevada caucusing at a critical time in the campaign for the remaining Democratic field. While New Hampshire and Iowa gave Sen. Bernie Sanders and Mayor Pete Buttigieg some early momentum, Nevada is the first state that will include a diverse voting base. The Nevada Democratic Party says the Nevada Caucuses is a good litmus test on who could best represent the party and be the Democrats' standard-bearer in 2020. After Iowa, all eyes on the tabulationUnlike most primaries, which are run by state boards of election, caucuses are run by the party. Two weeks ago, the Iowa Democratic Party came under fire for a failed vote tabulation as results took several days to be compiled. The fiasco in Iowa was caused by a glitch in an app, and forced the state party chair to step down. Democrats are hopeful that technology does not fail them again. Nevada Democrats too are going to rely on technology. Precincts will each use an iPad with a Google Drive document used to report real-time numbers back to the party. Precinct chairs will also be asked to call the Democratic Party, and send a picture via text message of the paper tabulation that is signed off by representatives of the viable campaigns. How a caucus worksCaucuses are more akin to community events rather than a typical election. Rather than using a secret ballot, caucus goers will first hear from supporters of the candidates, representatives of the campaigns, or perhaps even from the candidate themselves.Then, those on hand will literally "take sides," and join with other supporters of that campaign. At the precinct, a determination is made of viable and non-viable candidates (generally 15% is the threshold).The supporters of non-viable candidates will then be given 15 minutes to join a viable campaign, or abstain. Once the 15 minutes are up, a tally is taken, and the Nevada Democratic Party releases the number of delegates won by each candidate, which is the most important figure of the day. The party will also release popular vote totals.How are ties brokenIf there is a tie at a caucus site that would affect the number of delegates, the precinct chair will use a deck of cards to break the tie. This is Nevada after all. What is at stake on SaturdayFor Saturday's Nevada Caucuses, a total of 36 national delegates will be up for grabs. The Democrats divvy delegates in a proportional basis, meaning with a wide-open field, it is likely that a candidate will not receive a majority of the delegates on Monday.But with Nevada representing some of the first votes cast in the nomination process, it is important to do well for fundraising and momentum purposes.Where the race standsButtigieg holds a slight lead in delegates over Sanders (23-21). Other candidates with delegates are Sen. Elizabeth Warren (8), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (7) and VP Joe Biden (6). Mayor Michael Bloomberg did not enter the first two nominating contests, and will sit out Saturday’s Nevada Caucuses and the South Carolina Primary on Feb. 29.Although Buttigieg holds the lead in delegates, it is hard to describe him as the frontrunner. Sanders has a plurality of votes, and leads national polling.Polls in recent weeks have consistently shown Sanders in the lead in Nevada. He also has been leading nationally.Real Clear Politics tracks major opinion polls, and an aggregate of polls show that Sanders has seen his share of the vote go from 19% to 27% in the last three weeks. During that time, Bloomberg has seen his numbers more than double, as he has gone from the back of the pack to nearly even with one-time frontrunner Biden for second.But on March 3, the biggest night of the nominating race awaits as more than a dozen states, including Texas and California, hold primaries. These states are already conducting early voting, meaning Wednesday’s debate could be the final opportunity for candidates to make an impression before a crucial Super Tuesday race. 4002