成都静脉扩张手术需多少钱-【成都川蜀血管病医院】,成都川蜀血管病医院,成都治疗血管瘤的方法,成都静脉曲张多少钱,成都脉管炎手术治疗,成都检查静脉曲张要花多少钱,成都有哪些下肢动脉硬化医院,精索静脉曲张成都哪些医院可治疗
成都静脉扩张手术需多少钱成都脉管炎应怎样治疗,成都治血糖足好医院,成都治疗老烂腿什么医院看,成都大隐静脉{曲张}造影价格,成都医院有精索静脉曲张专科,成都怎么治疗好脉管炎,成都治静脉扩张手术的费用
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Complaints about red-light runners are mounting at a busy intersection in Mira Mesa.Jacob Rogers, 12, says his dad was recently driving him through the intersection, when this happened. 219
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Authorities in California have identified the sailor who died after being struck by a spinning helicopter blade as 32-year-old Lt. James Mazzuchelli.Mazzuchelli was a flight surgeon assigned to Marine Light Attack Helicopter Squadron 267, Marine Aircraft Group 39 and was stationed at MCAS Camp Pendleton.Mazzuchelli is from Orange Park, Florida and was previously deployed to Japan.“Lt. James Mazzuchelli was an incredibly talented physician and Sailor,” said Col. Matthew Mowery, commanding officer of MAG-39. “His contagious enthusiasm, motivation, and love for the Marines and Sailors of HMLA-267 and MAG-39 has been evident in the outpouring of grief at his loss and the support being shown to his family and close friends. His willingness to join the Navy and elect to serve faithfully with the Marines should give a sense of pride to all of us who serve our country that we are surrounded by heroes every day. James and his contribution to our Corps will be sorely missed."The sailor died Saturday morning after being hit by the spinning tail rotor blade of a UH-01Y Venom Marine helicopter.The incident is currently under investigation. 1182
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Border officials seized more than 10 tons of marijuana hidden behind a cargo shipment at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry this week.At about 9 a.m. Monday, an agent with U.S. Customs and Border Protection was inspecting a truck with a manifested shipment of "plastic garment hangers." The vehicle was referred to a secondary inspection where an x-ray machines would continue the inspection.During the secondary inspection, officers detected an anomaly which prompted another examination this time with a canine. The canine alerted officers to the vehicle's trailer, where a search led to 858 plastic-wrapped packages stacked to the trailer's ceiling behind cargo.RELATED:Border Patrol arrests teen with toy car at U.S.-Mexico borderMother tries to smuggle meth with young children in SUV, Border Patrol saysBorder officials say the wall is working, drug smuggling shifting to the seaCBP officers said the packages tested positive for marijuana. There were more than 10 tons of the narcotics, worth about .4 million.The driver of the truck, a 47-year-old Mexican citizen, was turned over to Homeland Security and his B1/B2 visa was canceled, CBP said. The truck, trailer, shipment, and narcotics were seized by CBP.“The ability of CBP officers to interdict contraband at the port of entry is a perfect example of CBP’s efforts to secure our border,” Joseph Misenhelter, Officer in Charge at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry, said. “CBP officers prevented over 10 tons of marijuana from entering our community.” 1529
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — As states continue to count votes, one thing is clear: the pre-election polls were off again.Pollsters underestimated support for President Donald Trump by a wider margin than they did in 2016, prompting a number of theories about what went wrong and why changes adopted after the 2016 election proved ineffective.Heading into Election Day 2020, candidate Joe Biden led Trump nationally by an average of 8.4%, according to FiveThirtyEight’s polling average. We won’t know the final margin until all the votes are counted, but it looks like Trump’s support was underestimated by about 3.5%.That’s wider than the national popular vote miss in 2016, when the polls underestimated Trump’s support by 1.1%.“Polling emerged from 2016 with a black eye. This is fair to say a second black eye in 2020,” said Jay Leve of polling firm SurveyUSA.Leve said the industry thought it had corrected its 2016 mistakes. Polling in the 2018 midterms was very accurate.In 2020, pollsters made sure to weigh for education level and include enough non-college-educated white voters to try to capture a representative sample of the electorate.But state polls show it didn’t work. In Ohio, there was a nearly 8-point miss. In Wisconsin, there was a nearly 10-point miss. In Florida, the polls missed by 5 points and incorrectly showed Biden in the lead.“While pollsters attempted to correct for the mistakes that they made in 2016, President Trump was busy hammering home a narrative that, number one, the media is the enemy of the people. And number two, polls are fake polls,” Leve said.Leve thinks that skepticism and distrust caused Trump supporters to ignore pollsters at a higher rate, causing them to be underrepresented in samples.San Diego State political scientist Dr. Stephen Goggin says there are other theories as well.“Between mail-in balloting, the pandemic, between all the early voting and all the confusion it creates, it’s possible some of that played a role in creating the error we saw this time,” he said.Goggin said the pandemic may have made the models used to predict voter turnout less accurate this cycle. Many surveys heading into the election showed an unusual trend: Biden was polling better among so-called “likely voters” than among registered voters overall. Typically Republicans hold an edge among likely voters, Nate Cohn of the New York Times noted.There’s also some early data suggesting once the pandemic hit, Democrats started responding to surveys more frequently, something that could have shifted the poll numbers.There may have also been issues surveying certain demographic groups. Pre-election polls showed Biden chipping away at Trump’s lead with seniors compared to 2016, but Biden actually did worse than Clinton with that demographic in certain key states. Trump’s support among Hispanic voters in Florida also surprised pollsters. If exit polling data shows that trend continued in other states, it might explain about one-quarter of this year’s polling error, according to the New York Times.“Many of these errors are fixable when they find out what went wrong and you can still get high-quality samples,” Goggin said.Pollsters are planning to do detailed autopsies on the election once they have final turnout data and results by precinct. Polling firms will eventually post detailed data from their results to the Roper Center for more finely tuned analysis.ABC 10News used SurveyUSA this election cycle to poll 11 state and local races. The final polls accurately predicted the winner in all 11 races, although the margins weren’t perfect.The ABC 10News/Union-Tribune scientific polls actually overestimated Trump’s support in California by about 4 points, relative to vote totals as of November 12. 3757
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Body-worn cameras are now in widespread use across San Diego County.They catch some of the most controversial and impactful moments of police officer interactions with the public.As part of the Team 10 Transparency Project, 10News set out to learn more about local departments policies and what type of impact the cameras are having in the community."Body-worn camera, in my opinion, is just another piece of evidence to what occurred," said San Diego County Sheriff's Department Sergeant Rob Samuels.Under Senate Bill 1421, a recent law enforcement transparency law, the San Diego County Sheriff's Department released a handful of body-worn camera recordings.The recordings are the end product, capturing moments that could be used in court to prosecute a suspect, exonerate a member of law enforcement or sue a department.But to get to that end, departments have laid out policies that guide how and when to use the cameras."Whenever a deputy is anticipating they are going to be taking some enforcement action they should be turning it on," Samuels said.The Sheriff's Department policy is only a few pages, but it covers everything from training to camera position, when and where to record, and rules for reviewing that video.According to the policy, "Deputies/community services officers shall activate the [body worn camera] BWC to record all law enforcement related contacts. While away from department facilities, deputies shall keep their BWC powered on and in stand-by mode."MORE LIKE THIS Police expert says improvements needed in law enforcement complaint processExclusive: How San Diego law enforcement responds to mental health crisesInvestigating Officers: How SDPD investigates its own after an officer-Involved shootingAccording to the policy, deputies will typically not allow citizens to review recordings; however, deputy discretion is allowed to replay the recording for citizens at the scene to mitigate possible minor complaints."On average, we see about 60 minutes of recording per camera per day and at any given time and point we have about 250 cameras out in the field," said San Diego County Sheriff's Department Chief Information Officer Ashish Kakkad.Kakkad said deputies are allowed to review only their body camera recordings. Access is extremely limited.The policy states, "A deputy may not review the BWC video of other involved deputies before writing a report or giving a statement unless necessary for evidentiary purposes and with the express permission of a supervisor."It's very much a role-based access," Kakkad said. "What is your role? What are you doing? What is your function? And based on your function, your appropriate access is determined."Kakkad said no deputy has the power to edit or delete video.In the two years, the body-worn camera program has been up and running, the department hasn't deleted any video, he said.The heads of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department's program believe it's been a good thing.But are cameras doing anything to bridge the gap between the public and the people they serve?"You won't really ever know what it may have prevented in the way of a complaint," Samuels said.Numbers do show substantiated and unsubstantiated complaints are down for the Sheriff's Department.10News wanted to see if body cameras had an impact on how San Diego County law enforcement interacts with the public.Team 10 requested use of force data dating back five years from departments across the county.Use of force is the type of action law enforcement uses to mitigate an incident, make an arrest, or protect themselves or others from harm.Here's what we found from departments that have responded to our request at the time of this writing.Oceanside initially saw a significant increase in use of force in 2018 when the cameras were deployed. Although officials tell us it was a staggered deployment. So far this year, use of force numbers show a significant decrease.In the three years since El Cajon deployed body-worn cameras use of force increased. The department said use of force numbers could increase for several reasons, and there also may be no direct correlation between those numbers and body-worn cameras. In San Diego, a 2017 report noted that since officers began wearing body cameras, there were fewer instances of greater controlling/defending force, a reduction in complaints and allegations, and de-escalation of some situations.While statistics vary, the Sheriff's Department said the cameras are just another tool."We still do business like we've always done business, we write accurate reports, and the video we record on body-worn camera just supports what the deputy writes," Samuels said. 4707