四川主治下肢血管炎医院成都静脉血栓治疗费多少,成都 血栓 医院,成都脉管畸形手术哪家医院做,成都静脉曲张医院地址?,成都有治精索静脉曲张病的医院吗,成都医院治疗小腿静脉曲张费用,成都哪里雷诺氏综合症手术好

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - Efforts stretched into a seventh day Friday to contain a wildfire that has blackened thousands of acres in rural eastern San Diego County, leveling at least 30 homes, dozens of outbuildings and forcing widespread evacuations.As of 6 p.m. Friday, crews had the sprawling burn area southeast of Alpine about 55% contained, according to Cal Fire. Firefighters remained particularly focused on its western and northern flanks, where smoldering hot spots were posing the most immediate remaining structural threats, the state agency reported.The conflagration, dubbed the Valley Fire, has blackened 17,665 acres, destroyed 30 residences and 29 auxiliary structures, damaged 11 other buildings and left two firefighters with minor injuries.Friday, all evacuation orders, warnings, and road closures had been lifted, according to CAL FIRE San Diego. Non-residents are asked to avoid the area.Cleveland National Forest remains under an Emergency Forest Closure order until conditions improve for future visitors.Residents returning to the area are asked to exercise extreme caution around trees, power poles, and other tall objects that may have been weakened by the fire. San Diego Sheriff's Department has increased patrols in the area to prevent looting and provide public safety, CAL FIRE added.The blaze erupted for unknown reasons early Saturday afternoon off Spirit Trail and Carveacre Road in Japatul Valley and spread rapidly through tinder-dry vegetation amid sweltering heat and high winds, according to Cal Fire. More than 1,000 local, state, federal and military firefighters have battled the blaze by ground and aboard firefighting aircraft, officials said.Evacuation orders remained in effect Thursday evening for the back- country communities of Carveacre, Japatul Valley, Lawson Valley and Lyons Valley. Residents of Alpine, Barrett Junction, Descanso, Dulzura, Pine Valley, Potrero and Viejas were advised to be prepared to clear out of their homes on short notice if serious flare-ups occurred near their neighborhood."We would encourage everybody to stay out of those areas," sheriff's Lt. Tony O'Boyle told reporters during a briefing Thursday morning. "Just because you don't see smoke or flames doesn't mean there aren't hazards in there. And there are -- downed power lines, gas leaks, unstable boulders and hot spots."Some roadways in and around the burn zone have been reopened to residents only, the lieutenant said."Please, folks, if you're not from the area, stay away," O'Boyle said. "It's not a time to be getting photographs. It's not a time to be flying drones. It's not a time to be getting video."A shelter for displaced residents was in operation at Steele Canyon in Spring Valley. Lakeside Rodeo Arena was available to shelter horses, and those in need of a safe place to board pets or livestock until the wildfire is extinguished also were encouraged to make use of one of two San Diego County Animal Services shelters, in Bonita and Spring Valley.Fire-related power outages kept about 142 addresses in the vicinity of the blaze without electrical service Friday morning, and possibly for several more days, according to SDG&E.Due to smoke drifting over much of the county because of the blaze, the San Diego County Pollution Control District advised that air-quality levels were unhealthy in parts of the region and advised people to limit outdoor activities until conditions improve.As the Valley Fire spread, Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency for San Diego County, a move intended to free up federal relief funds.On Wednesday afternoon, the county Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to ratify a local emergency proclamation issued Sunday in response to the Valley Fire. The action will provide monies to address damage resulting from the blaze and make the region eligible for potential federal and state resources that would help repair roadways and other public infrastructure, and reimburse emergency-response costs, according to county officials.During Thursday's news conference, District 2 County Supervisor Dianne Jacob urged East County residents to put together an emergency "go kit" of supplies in case of evacuation orders, as well as download the SD Emergency App and sign up for crisis notifications at ReadySanDiego.org.She advised those who have lost their homes or other property to the wildfire to call the County Assistance Hotline at 858-715-2200 or email valleyfirerecovery.@sdcounty@ca.gov.Additionally, a "one-stop shop" county assistance center for victims of the blaze will be operating at Rancho San Diego Library, 11555 Via Rancho San Diego, Jacob told reporters. The services will be available Saturdays and Sundays 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Mondays 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. until further notice.Those who would like to help victims of the fire can make donations to a disaster-relief fund implemented by the San Diego Foundation, which can be accessed online at sdcountyrecovery.com. 4981

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - Firefighters today came to the rescue of a 4-year-old girl who got one of her hands caught in an escalator at the Fashion Valley mall.The accident occurred in a Bloomingdale's store at the Friars Road shopping center shortly before 4:30 p.m., according to the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department.After emergency personnel freed the child from the mechanized stairway, medics took her to Rady Children's Hospital for treatment of injuries of undisclosed severity, the city agency reported. 511

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A lawsuit has been filed on behalf of 40 women against Pornhub's parent company for hosting videos produced by former San Diego-based website GirlsDoPorn.com, the owners and operators of which are facing federal sex trafficking charges.The plaintiffs, identified as Jane Does 1 through 40 in the lawsuit filed Tuesday in San Diego federal court, allege Montreal-based MindGeek owns and operates a multitude of pornographic sites that have hosted videos featuring the women, and maintained its business relationship with GirlsDoPorn even as the site came under scrutiny for allegations of videos made through coercion and fraud.The suit alleges MindGeek's business partnership with GirlsDoPorn continued through late 2019 and only ended because GirlsDoPorn ceased to exist amid a Department of Justice sex trafficking investigation and a civil lawsuit filed in San Diego Superior Court.The federal suit alleges that after the partnership ended, MindGeek's sites continued hosting victims' videos, including as recently as Dec. 12."MindGeek knew it was partnering with and profiting from a sex trafficking venture for years," the latest suit alleges. "MindGeek also knew of the significant harassment and trauma GirlsDoPorn's victims were enduring by its continued publication of the victims' videos. MindGeek simply did not care and continued to partner with GirlsDoPorn until it was no longer profitable because of the indictments and arrests."MindGeek did not respond for comment regarding the lawsuit.The company and its most popular site, Pornhub, were featured in a New York Times article this month alleging Pornhub hosts videos featuring rape and child abuse. In the article's wake, several major credit card companies -- including Visa, Mastercard and Discover -- cut ties with the website and Pornhub instituted a ban on videos uploaded by unverified users and removed millions of videos from the website this week.In the Superior Court case originally filed in 2016, GirlsDoPorn's owners were sued by 22 women who alleged they were coerced to film pornographic videos or led to believe their videos would only be distributed to private owners, rather than proliferated online on GirlsDoPorn's subscription website, as well as numerous free sites, many of which are owned by MindGeek.Several of the women alleged they were lured to San Diego with online advertisements that made no mention of nudity or pornography, much less the GirlsDoPorn business name.The women were awarded nearly million earlier this year by San Diego Superior Court Judge Kevin Enright, who ruled the defendants pressured the women to sign documents replete with "broad, vague releases couched in disorganized, complicated legalese," which obscured the victims' concerns over potential online dissemination. Other women hired as "reference models" allegedly spoke to uneasy victims over the phone and claimed they had been featured in prior videos without issue, falsely assuring victims that their videos would not end up on the internet.Once the women discovered their videos were posted online, the website owners ignored requests to take the videos down and cut contact with the women altogether, Enright ruled. The women also alleged GirlsDoPorn's owners shared links to their videos with people within the victims' social circles in order to drive up website traffic.Late last year, prior to Enright's ruling in the civil suit, federal prosecutors filed sex trafficking charges against the site's owners and operators, alleging many of the same claims presented in the civil case. Six defendants are currently charged, including GirlsDoPorn owner Michael James Pratt, who remains at large. 3707

SAN DIEGO (CNS) -- Low-income San Diegans who have experienced financial hardships due to the COVID-19 pandemic can begin applying Monday for one-time emergency financial help to pay their rent.The program, which the San Diego Housing Commission is administering for the city, will provide up to ,000 per household to help eligible families and individuals pay past-due and upcoming rent.Online applications will be accepted through Aug. 7. Payments are expected to be made beginning in mid-August and continuing through September and potentially into October."San Diego's rental assistance program will directly assist individuals and families struggling to make rent and help recover the financial loss of landlords," said City Councilman Chris Ward, who proposed San Diego's COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program. "We have protected our unsheltered. We have supported our small businesses. Now we must meet our obligations to the renters of this city."The council voted 9-0 on June 30 to authorize the expenditure of .1 million in federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act funds for the emergency rental assistance program.The public can apply for the program at covidapplication.sdhc.org."The launch of this online application is a crucial first step to help provide this essential financial assistance as soon as possible to San Diego households struggling because of COVID-19," San Diego Housing Commission President and CEO Richard C. Gentry said.Around 3,500 households could receive emergency rental assistance through the program, if all households received the maximum of ,000. SDHC staff will coordinate with selected applicants and their landlord or property management company to disburse payments. All payments will be made directly to the landlord or property management company by direct deposit.To be eligible for the program, households must have a San Diego address; 60% or below of the area median income -- ,200 per year for a family of four; must not be receiving any rental subsidies; must not be a tenant of a property owned or managed by SDHC, must not have savings with which they can meet the rent; have eligible immigration status; and have experienced hardship related to the pandemic.All applicants who meet the eligibility requirements will have the opportunity to be selected to receive assistance. Priority will be given to families with minor children and households with at least one person age 62 or older. Applications will be sorted and assigned numbers at random to identify the applicants who will receive help to pay their rent.To apply, tenants need to have their landlord's name, email address, mailing address and phone number. Applicants are also required to upload and submit supporting documents such as a driver's license, most recent lease agreement, current utility bill, documentation of household income and documentation demonstrating loss of income or increase in medical expenses due to COVID-19.SDHC will be partnering with community-based organizations, which will assist with community outreach and will be available to help eligible households complete the online application.Philanthropic donations also are encouraged to support the program. Donations payable to SDHC Building Opportunities Inc., SDHC's nonprofit affiliate, may be made through the nonprofit's GoFundMe charity page. For more information about making a donation, email covidrentdonations@sdhc.org.For information about programs in response to COVID-19, visit SDHC's website, www.sdhc.org/about-us/coronavirus-covid-19. 3589

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A teenage boy who shot his father five times in the master bedroom of the family's Scripps Ranch condominium last year, then fired another shot through the door of another bedroom, where his mother and half- brother had barricaded themselves, will be remanded to a juvenile detention facility for as much as nine years, a judge ruled Friday.The 16-year-old defendant was tried as a juvenile and found guilty last month for the April 29, 2018, killing of 46-year-old Thanh "Sonny" Pham, as well as the attempted murder of his mother.According to prosecutors, juvenile court sentencing guidelines dictate that the boy can be held in custody until he is 25, though he could be paroled earlier than that.Superior Court Judge Louis R. Hanoian said the sentence for the convicted counts would have the boy facing a 67-year-to-life prison sentence had he been of age.RELATED: Man dead after shooting in Scripps Ranch; 15-year-old son arrestedDuring the boy's bench trial, Deputy District Attorney Mary Loeb said the teen ambushed his father, using Pham's own Glock pistol, then came "storming out of the bedroom with the gun" and began scoping the unit for his mother and half-brother, who had taken refuge inside his sibling's bedroom. Loeb said the gun was empty after the youth fired on his father, and he had to return to the bedroom to reload so he could "continue on this rampage."Defense attorney Mary Ellen Attridge argued that the killing was committed in self-defense, following years of routine physical abuse at Pham's hands. The juvenile testified that Pham often struck him as a form of discipline, including once just minutes before the shooting, knocking him briefly unconscious. He also said that Pham once shoved his mother out of a moving vehicle and his family members also testified that Pham was abusive with them and the boy.Following the shooting, the boy, then 15, fled from the condo on foot before police arrived, but was arrested about 1 a.m. the following day, roughly two miles from his home, after someone spotted him on Scripps Poway Parkway near Interstate 15. He had the handgun in his waistband and dozens of rounds of ammunition in his backpack when taken into custody, according to police.RELATED: Teen denies killing father in Scripps Ranch homeHanoian ruled that there were true findings -- the equivalent of guilty verdicts -- for murder and attempted murder, as he felt the evidence did not support claims that Pham was "a violent ogre" and "a sadistic abuser" as he felt Pham had been portrayed by the defense.During Friday's dispositional hearing -- the juvenile court equivalent of a sentencing hearing -- attorneys argued over what type of custody was more appropriate to provide the boy with proper treatment and rehabilitation.Loeb argued to have the boy placed in one of two state youth correctional facilities -- either in Stockton or Camarillo -- while Attridge sought to have the boy placed in a less-restrictive youth program in Otay Mesa, where his family could more easily visit him for the purposes of facilitating family therapy. Attridge also said she will file a notice of appeal on the boy's behalf.Hanoian ruled that the Department of Juvenile Justice's facilities provided a more thorough program to assist the boy in terms of his mental health, educational opportunities -- including college courses and career technical education -- , and rehabilitation."We need to get (the boy) up and running. We need to have him become a productive member of society and we need to give him the training, the education, and the skills and the therapy that's necessary," Hanoian said.The judge said that he did consider concerns over a lack of face-to- face family therapy with the boy housed outside of San Diego County, but said that technological means like video conferencing would allow him to undergo that therapy with family members.The boy did not make a statement during the hearing, but Attridge said he "is very remorseful about what happened here. It has changed his family's entire life and it has changed his life and he regrets having done anything to end his father's life."She also said that upon his release, she believed "he will be somebody who will never recidivate" and will leave custody "a better person, a more mature person and a nonviolent person."Pham's younger sister, Catherine Wright, said her brother was "confident, charming, funny, athletic and intelligent," a good brother to her, a good uncle to her daughter, and their parents' pride and joy.Wright said the depictions of her brother as an abuser pained her greatly and the fact that he'd been killed by his own son made it "easier to tell people that he died of a heart attack."Just as Pham had meant everything to their dad, Wright said the defendant meant everything to her brother."I cannot imagine a more horrible death for Sonny to suffer. I'm haunted by thoughts of Sonny laying on the floor in pain, gutted not just by his physical wounds, but in the realization that his firstborn son, his only son, turned on him and shot him," Wright said.She said she was not yet able to forgive the boy, but that her brother would have wanted to have his son "to have the opportunity to heal what is broken inside of him. He would want his family to be safe and loved." 5320