成都慢性前列腺肥大治疗需要多少费用成都小腿静脉曲张手术需多少钱,成都什么医院可以做静脉曲张手术,成都治大隐静脉曲张的大概费用,成都医治静脉血栓费用,成都做糖足手术哪家医院好,成都脉管畸形哪所医院好,成都下肢静脉血栓动手术需要多少钱

The Trump administration is proposing to restructure its US Forest Service program that trains low-income, rural students how to respond to national emergencies.The National Federation of Federal Employees, the union that represents Forest Service employees, says the move will cut more than 1,000 jobs.The Job Corps Civilian Conservation Centers will be moved from the US Department of Agriculture to the US Department of Labor, and, in the process, nine of the 25 programs' centers will be closed down in states like Wisconsin, Kentucky, Virginia and Oregon."This action creates an opportunity to serve a greater number of students at higher performing centers at a lower cost to taxpayers by modernizing and reforming part of the Job Corps program," the Labor Department said, announcing the restructuring on Friday.The remaining 16 centers will "continue under new contract operator or partnership," the agency said.In a note to staff on Friday, Forest Service Chief Victoria Christiansen addressed what she said will be a "very difficult transition" and acknowledged that they will seek a "reduction in force."Christiansen said the transition is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2019.CNN has reached out to the Labor Department.The National Federation of Federal Employees said it expects 1,065 jobs to be eliminated by September. The Labor Department release does not, however, say how many federal jobs will be affected."This is a politically motivated attack that oddly enough, offends both Democrats and Republicans in Congress and in communities across the country," the union's president, Randy Erwin, said in a 1644

TOWSON, Md. — Home videos capture images of Deborah Limmer and her 5-year-old granddaughter, Delaney Gaddis, which now serve as painful reminders of two lives lost, leaving the young girl's father searching for words to describe 241

The slow-churning remnants of Tropical Storm Imelda that flooded parts of Texas left at least two people dead and rescue crews with boats scrambling to reach stranded drivers and families trapped in their homes during a relentless downpour that drew comparisons to Hurricane Harvey two years ago.By Thursday night, floodwaters had started receding in most of the Houston area, said the city's mayor, Sylvester Turner. Law enforcement officers planned to work well into the night to clear freeways of vehicles stalled and abandoned because of flooding, Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo said.Officials in Harris County, which includes Houston, said there had been a combination of at least 1,700 high-water rescues and evacuations to get people to shelter as the longevity and intensity of the rain quickly came to surprise even those who had been bracing for floods. The storm also flooded parts of southwestern Louisiana.More than 900 flights were canceled or delayed in Houston. Further along the Texas Gulf Coast, authorities at one point warned that a levee could break near Beaumont in Jefferson County. During Harvey, Beaumont's only pump station was swamped by floodwaters, leaving residents without water service for more than a week.Imelda's remnants Thursday led to the deaths of two men. A 19-year-old man drowned and was electrocuted while trying to move his horse to safety, according to a message from his family shared by the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office. Crystal Holmes, a spokeswoman for the department, said the death occurred during a lightning storm.A man in his 40s or 50s drowned when he tried to drive a van through 8-foot-deep floodwaters near Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston during the Thursday afternoon rush hour, Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez said. 1805

The US economy added only 75,000 jobs in May, a surprisingly low number that was well below what experts had predicted.Meanwhile, the unemployment rate remained at 3.6%, meaning that joblessness is still hovering near a half-century low.The report supports suspicions that the labor market is finally slowing down from its blistering pace in 2018, with revisions to the past two months subtracting 75,000 jobs. Employers have added 164,000 jobs per month on average in 2019, compared with 223,000 jobs per month last year.Still, economists had expected 185,000 jobs added in May, so 75,000 fell far short of those expectations.The share of people who have jobs or are looking for them remained the same, suggesting that the low number may stem from the difficulty of finding workers after 104 months of continuous job creation. The share of people who can't find enough hours or stopped looking for work because they couldn't find a job decreased to 7.1%, nearing the lowest level on record, 6.8% in October 2000.Wage growth also decelerated slightly, with average hourly earnings rising 3.1% from a year earlier, down from a 3.2% rate a month earlier.Health care and professional and business services were singular bright spots in the report, and have added nearly 900,000 jobs over the past year between them.But construction, mining and manufacturing showed little change from April. Manufacturing has been particularly weak over the past several months, and measures of business confidence in the sector have reached cycle lows as President Donald Trump threatens new tariffs on Mexico. 1603

TripAdvisor has defended itself against accusations of misleading travelers by failing to stop some of its highest ranked hotels winning their status with fake reviews.UK consumer group Which? Travel analyzed a total of almost 250,000 reviews for the 10 top-ranked hotels in 10 global tourist destinations, from Las Vegas to Cape Town. It found that one in seven of the hotels had "blatant hallmarks" of fake reviews, with others raising "serious concerns."But TripAdvisor called the analysis "flawed" and said its more sophisticated detection tools were able to weed out fraudulent feedback.Which? Travel said that when it reported 15 of the worst cases to TripAdvisor, the reviews giant -- now one of the world's biggest travel websites -- admitted that all but one of the hotels in question had been caught using fake reviews in the past year.Six had previously been penalized, and two had received a "red badge warning" -- where TripAdvisor warns users that the hotel is suspected of using fake reviews, and has "repeatedly failed to remedy its behavior and refuses to cooperate with TripAdvisor's investigators."Yet, Which? Travel said it found that the review patterns had continued unabated despite the measures, and the red badges had been removed.The group has accused TripAdvisor of a "lack of serious ongoing action to address repeated abuse of the system."It says that five-star reviews left by new users who have written no other reviews should be a red flag. Its analysis compared the proportion of first-time five-star reviews with that of first-time three-star reviews, which are less likely to be faked.In total, it studied 247,277 reviews."TripAdvisor's failure to stop fake reviews and take strong action against hotels that abuse the system risks misleading millions of travelers and potentially ruining their holidays," said Which? Travel's Naomi Leach.TripAdvisor has removed hundreds of reviews in light of the investigation, Which? Travel claimed."Striking" evidence of fake reviewsHotels in the Middle East had "striking" amounts of fake positive reviews, according to the research. TripAdvisor docked 730 five-star reviews of the "best" hotel in Jordan following the analysis -- but the hotel has not been given a red badge. It remains in the top 10 in the country.At the top-ranking hotel in Cairo, 79% of five-star reviews came from one-time contributors. Just 14% of three-star reviews came from similar accounts.The hotel has lost its status as a result of the reviews' deletion.Las Vegas was another hotspot for fake reviews. At two of the top-rated hotels, almost half the five-star reviews came from one-time contributors. For a competitor which did not arouse suspicion, the figure was just 3%.Some of the top-ranked hotels in London, Paris, Barcelona and Cape Town "gave reason for suspicion," the research showed, but failed to demonstrate the same patterns across the board.Repeat offendersTripAdvisor called the analysis "based on a flawed understanding of fake review patterns," adding that "it is simply far too simplistic to assume all first-time reviewers are suspicious."It said that Which? Travel did not have access to IP [internet protocol] information or location data, both of which TripAdvisor uses to detect fake reviews."We analyze hundreds of data points about each review -- most of which only we have access to -- and we combine that data with a wealth of knowledge and understanding of review patterns that our team of experts has gained from tracking hundreds of millions of reviews over a near 20-year period," said the company."This includes an ability to track and analyze first-time reviews in far more detail and with far more rigor than Which's team was able to do."Online reviews influence an annual estimated ￡23 billion ( billion) of booking transactions in the UK alone, according to the UK government."Sites like TripAdvisor must do more to ensure the information on their platforms is reliable," said Naomi Leach."If they continue to fall short, they should be compelled to make changes so holidaymakers are no longer at risk of being duped by a flood of fake reviews." 4152