成都哪家医院蛋蛋静脉曲张好成都腿血栓要花多少钱,成都脉管炎咋治疗,宜宾血管瘤专科医院,成都肝血管瘤哪个医院能治,成都查精索静脉曲张什么医院比较好,成都看老烂腿哪个医院比较好,成都治蛋蛋静脉曲张医院哪个好

Just had an earthquake this morning at 8:07:49 am where I live. Biggest earthquake since 1916. #earthquake pic.twitter.com/YhBbUp7VkX— A p h r o d i t e | K e r b e r o s (@philostorgy) August 9, 2020 214

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The NFL has decided to move the upcoming Kansas City Chiefs and Los Angeles Rams game from Mexico City to Los Angeles due to poor field conditions.The NFL tweeted a statement Tuesday saying that the field didn't meet standards for "playability and consistency."  304

Journalists are boycotting coverage of films from Walt Disney Studios in order to show solidarity with the L.A. Times, which is being blocked by the company.Entertainment sites like The A.V. Club and Flavorwire, as well as a pop culture writer for the Washington Post, said they would curb their Disney coverage until the ban of the Times was lifted."It's a dangerous precedent that Disney is setting: Write an unfavorable story—one that Disney hasn't disputed factually, even—and it will blacklist your publication, punishing independent journalism by using its massive corporate influence," wrote A.A. Dowd, the A.V. Club's film editor.Last week, the Times explained in an editor's note that Disney's films were not included in its annual Holiday movie preview because of a story the Times published in September that examined the business relationship between the company's Californian theme park -- Disneyland -- and the city of Anaheim.Disney put out a statement Friday saying that while they work with news organizations they "don't always agree with," the Times "showed a complete disregard for basic journalistic standards" in relation to the Disneyland story and that's what led to the ban.The A.V. Club said it was following in the footsteps of the Post's Alyssa Rosenberg, who explained on Monday that even though she's excited to see Disney films like next month's "Star Wars: The Last Jedi," she can't "in good conscience attend similar showings or write reviews in advance" as long as Disney is blocking the Times from press screenings.She added that she doesn't speak for the Post, and that until the Times' critics are "treated like everyone else and welcomed back to press screenings," that she'll write about the films after they are released."I like a lot of movies that come out of the Disney corporate behemoth," she wrote. "But I like journalistic independence from corporate influence more. This is a fine price for me to pay for it."On Monday, Flavorwire also joined the boycott saying that they will "withhold the only thing we have of value to that studio: the free advertising provided by not only reviewing their films, but write-ups of their trailers, production announcements, casting rumors, and so on."They added that while they are a tiny platform they hope that if larger outlets are willing to join that "maybe that will move the needle a little."Disney did not immediately respond to request for comment regarding this story. 2509

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Imagine getting a COVID-19 test from the comfort of your own home.That's what Costco is offering by selling saliva test kits online.They come at a steep price. The basic test kit is listed for 9.99, while a kit with video observation is 9.99.The KSHB I-team reached out to Costco for more information about the products. However, the company's corporate communications team was unwilling to respond to any questions, adding that it is not staffed to do so."As always our focus is to have merchandise available for our members at low warehouse prices," a spokesman wrote in an email.According to the Costco website, the kits are administered by Azova, which is a telemedicine platform.A fact sheet for patients found on the Azova website shows the test used is the P23 Labs TaqPath SARS CoV-2 Assay.The test has not been cleared or approved by the Food and Drug Administration. However, like many tests, it has received emergency use authorization from the agency.That means the makers of the test need to continually submit data to the FDA, which will evaluate the information and study the accuracy of diagnoses.Azova claims 98% of positive tests and 99% of negative test results are accurate."Saliva testing can be very accurate. It is probably chosen (for at-home testing) because the chance of having user error is much less than say a nasal swab," Dr. Dana Hawkinson of the University of Kansas Health System said.A customer who purchases a kit from Costco must complete a health assessment online with Azova and register for a lab order and test kit.The actual kit should come the next day, but results won't arrive for one to three days after the lab receives the sample.The kit with video observation, however, promises results in 24-48 hours."If that's the only thing that you're using for diagnosis and you have symptoms, you need to be isolated in your home until those results come back," Hawkinson added.In his opinion, it's not the most efficient way to get tested once the shipping time and wait for results are factored into the equation.However, Hawkinson believes we may see more options like this in the future."The technology is out there. It is progressing quickly," he said. "Hopefully as time goes on we do get more access to people so there can be readily available testing with efficient and accurate test results."The Costco website says both test kits are eligible for flexible medical spending accounts.Although the CARES Act mandated that insurers cover COVID testing costs, Dr. Kent Sepkowitz, a CNN medical analyst, writes whether insurers "will pay fully for more bells and whistles program such as that provided by Costco likely will vary plan to plan."This story was first reported by Cat Reid at KSHB in Kansas City, Missouri. 2794

LA JOLLA, Calif. (KGTV) -- A group of San Diego conservationists is testing a high-tech approach to catch poachers illegally fishing in marine protected areas.The Imperial Beach-based non-profit Wildcoast is in the midst of a pilot study with the Scripps Institution of Oceanography to examine the effectiveness of land-based radar as a real-time monitoring tool for law enforcement.A single radar station can send a signal up to three miles and detect vessels as small as a kayak, said Wildcoast conservationist Cory Pukini."Enforcement officers will be able to open up a laptop or look at their cell phone to see if people are in compliance without actually deploying resources to come out here," Pukini said while boating through one of the marine protected areas (MPAs).There are 11 MPAs in San Diego County which have restrictions on fishing, including one near Crystal Pier in Pacific Beach and another near the La Jolla Children's Pool. The areas are designed to help fish populations rebound, provide a buffer zone for the effects of climate change, and preserve other resources.A new law that took effect this year allows wardens to issue heftier fines to people caught fishing for profit in an MPA. The penalty for a first offense now ranges from ,000 to ,000, up from 0 to ,000. Although wardens have issued more fines and warnings in recent years, enforcement remains elusive. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has just one boat and five wardens to patrol 18 MPAs in San Diego and Orange Counties. That's where the land-based radar and app could make an impact, according to Pukini."It'll help them more efficiently deploy resources to the field," he said.Together with ocean temperatures and weather data, information gathered by the radar could be used to forecast the times and locations where poaching is most likely, Pukini said. The Marine Monitor Radar Project study is in its second year. If it's shown to be effective, the approach could help protect marine preserves around the world, Pukini said. 2050