成都治鲜红斑痣好疗法成都蛋蛋静脉曲张哪里手术比较好,成都治疗精索静脉曲张实惠的医院,成都血管瘤哪种治疗方式好,成都血管瘤手术怎么做,成都晟华精索静脉曲张医院,成都那家治老烂腿,成都海绵状血管瘤怎么做手术

A new reported loophole in the federal financial aid process is raising concerns about fairness. According to multiple reports, some parents from Illinois are giving up guardianship of their child before they go to college. It gives the student “independent status,” which can help them qualify for more student debt since their parents’ income isn’t considered.Emily Goodman, from the Partnership for College Completion, says she’s disappointed, but she’s not surprised. Goodman helps kids from low-income backgrounds finish college.“They’re really taking away opportunity for our low-income students in our state who may be the only access to college,” she says. “The only pathway to college is through state financial aid.”The reports say more than 40 families in question came from some of the wealthiest places in Illinois: Lake County.State Representative La Shawn Ford is working to close the loophole to make the system fairer. “These parents that really have the ability to pay are robbing the dreams of certain families and their kids the ability to go to college,” Ford says.He says the practice isn’t technically illegal, so any impactful change would have to happen on the federal level. He plans to crack down on private college admission businesses that allegedly pointed parents to this practice.“They can have some type of restrictions on how they guide and drive people to these types of immoral behaviors," Rep. Ford says.But others aren’t as confident that new regulations are the solution.Justin Draeger is one of them. He works for the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators."What we don't want is an overcorrection that then makes it really difficult, if not impossible, for students who are in legitimate legal guardianships to qualify for financial aid,” says Draeger.Rep. Ford argues the loophole only exposes a bigger issue.“If people have to go through measures to lie cheat and rob others of opportunities to go to college,” Ford says, “college is not affordable." 2027

A senior State Department official who appeared to have extravagantly padded her resume and to have touted a fake TIME magazine cover to bolster her standing has resigned, 184

Amid the coronavirus pandemic, almost nothing feels normal. Simply walking out your home comes with new rules to follow. Now, filing taxes this year is causing some confusion. “Normally, busy season is a challenge in and of itself, but this has added many more layers,” said Elieen Sherr, with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.Sherr has had an increase number of people confused on whether they are supposed to file their income taxes now, or if the federal income tax deadline extension applies to them.“This all happened in the last few weeks, and the states, they were waiting for the IRS to come out with their guidance,” said Sherr. “At first, it was just payment relief. Then, it was filing and payment relief, so that was confusing.”Sherr explained, just shy of the normal tax deadline, there is now some clearer guidance.The federal government has extended it deadline for federal tax filing and payments to July 15, 2020. Many states have now moved their filing deadlines to match.However, in a few states like Mississippi, Virginia, and Idaho, you have to file earlier. The deadline is May 15 in Mississippi, June 1 for Virginia, and June 15 in Idaho.Differing state and federal deadlines have some wondering if you file your state return early can you file your federal at the later deadline?“Generally, you have to start with the federal, so you will have to start with the federal to get to a state return,” said Sherr.Some good news in that instance: if you owe money on your federal return, you won’t have to pay that until July 15. If you are someone who is getting money back, even better news, returns are being processed right now, without delays.“They want to get the money out to everybody, especially the refund,” Sherr explained. “They want to get it into the economy so they are doing the best they can.” 1862

A woman who says she was raped at age 15 by Jeffrey Epstein is suing his estate, his alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell and three unnamed defendants, saying they conspired to maintain and conceal a sex trafficking ring.The accuser, Jennifer Araoz, told reporters Wednesday that Epstein, who died Saturday in prison by suicide, and his "network of enablers" stole her youth, identity, innocence and self-worth."While I am angry that Mr. Epstein's death means he will never personally answer to me in a court of law, my resolve to pursue justice is only strengthened," she said. "My story and my experiences -- those who enabled and facilitated his criminal behavior-- none of that is diminished or immunized simply because he apparently chose to take his own life."The lawsuit comes on the first day of a one-year period when any adult survivors of child sexual abuse can sue an abuser or a negligent institution in New York state court, no matter how long ago the abuse took place. The one-year window was created as part of a law signed in February."Fortunately, New York's Child Victims Act now affords survivors like me legal recourse," Araoz said. "Today, I am exercising my rights under that law. Today, I am starting to reclaim my power."Araoz alleges Epstein repeatedly committed sexual assault and battery against her when she was 14 and 15 years old and that he forcibly raped her. Araoz has not interacted with Maxwell, her attorneys said, but the lawsuit alleges Maxwell conspired to maintain and conceal the sex trafficking ring.Three Jane Does who also allegedly participated in the scheme are not named in the suit, which refers to them as "recruiter," "secretary," and "maid."Araoz alleges that all the defendants "have intentionally inflicted emotional distress" upon her, as well as "committed negligent infliction of emotional distress," causing her to suffer "extreme emotional injuries."Attorneys for Epstein and Maxwell did not respond immediately Wednesday to requests for comment about Araoz's suit. Maxwell and her representatives previously have denied she engaged in sexual abuse or sex trafficking. Epstein had pleaded not guilty to federal charges of conspiracy and sex trafficking of minors.Araoz came forward to authorities after the criminal charges were filed, her attorneys said Wednesday. She had been fully cooperating with federal prosecutors before Epstein's death and has agreed to cooperate in their investigation of his potential accomplices, they said.The lawsuit, provided to CNN by Araoz's attorneys, seeks compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. A draft version of the complaint was delivered to Epstein while he was in prison, about three weeks before his death.Araoz previously shed her anonymity and spoke out last month about Epstein's abuse in an interview with NBC's "Today" show.What the lawsuit statesCiting court records, Araoz's lawsuit alleges Maxwell -- the British socialite and Epstein's alleged madam -- "participated with and assisted Epstein in maintaining and protecting his sex trafficking ring, ensuring that approximately three girls a day were made available to him for his sexual pleasure."It also alleges she provided "organizational support to Epstein's sex trafficking ring, identifying and hiring the recruiters of underage girls" and "scheduling appointments with these underage girls" for Epstein's "sexual pleasure," as well as "intimidating potential witnesses to Epstein's sex trafficking operation."It alleges Maxwell "identified and hired" the "Recruiter" on Epstein's behalf to procure underage girls from the performing arts school Araoz attended near Epstein's lavish Manhattan apartment.Araoz began visiting Epstein's apartment in 2001 with the "recruiter," and at the end of the visits, the "secretary" was directed to give her 0 to purportedly "help" her out, the lawsuit states.After about a month of making the visits with the recruiter, "upon information and belief, Defendant Maxwell, began contacting" Araoz directly and "scheduling arrangements for her to visit Epstein's home alone."The suit details the alleged encounters, which Araoz has detailed to media. Epstein told her during one of her first visits alone to his Manhattan apartment, "you really should be a model," "I'll bet your body is incredible," and "in order to help you with your modeling career, I will need to see your body," the suit states.It alleges Epstein complimented her repeatedly about her breasts and instructed her to take off her top, "then immediately started feeling" her breasts and rubbing her nude shoulders.He asked her to give him a massage, which she did, and afterward he turned over, removed his towel and began masturbating, the suit states.Araoz felt "intimidated, so she did as she was told," the suit says.Owing to the money Epstein was giving Araoz, he said, "I take care of you, you take care of me," the suit states. He would tell her not to tell anyone about what occurred during the home visits, which routinely included massages, the suit states.After that, Epstein would call Araoz directly, and the sexual encounters became more aggressive and escalated, the suit states. The encounters would continue on a "weekly basis" and a "maid" would leave 0 in cash in a drawer in the massage room.During one encounter, Epstein held Araoz tightly and forcibly raped her, the lawsuit states. After that "brutal rape," Araoz never returned to the apartment, ignored Epstein's calls and transferred schools to avoid him, the suit states. 5566

A species of giant tortoise believed to have been extinct for more than 100 years has been discovered on the Galapagos island of Fernandina, according to Ecuador's government.The last known time a Fernandina Giant Tortoise was seen alive was 1906.An adult female believed to be more than a century old was seen alive on Sunday during an expedition by the Giant Tortoise Restoration Initiative (GTRI), according to a 428