成都海绵状血管瘤怎么做手术(成都鲜红斑痣去看什么科) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -  There are disturbing allegations that the foster system in San Diego County failed children it was supposed to protect.Critics question whether the rules of confidentiality designed to protect children are doing more to shield social services from scrutiny."My children are going to have to live a lifetime trying to get over and deal with this trauma,” said Melanie. 10News is not sharing Melanie’s last name to protect her adopted children. She is an adoptive mother and foster parent."I became a foster parent because I did want to make a difference in children's lives that didn't have families,” she said.Melanie said she became a foster parent about a decade ago. She wanted to give children in need a safe, loving home.However, Melanie says a potential adoptive child placed with her in 2015 ripped the joy right out of her home.The foster child “ended up sexually assaulting all three of Melanie's adopted sons,” said Melanie’s attorney Jomo Stewart.Stewart said they filed a lawsuit against the County of San Diego, several county employees, and a national foundation that focuses on foster care alleging they all were negligent in placing the child with Melanie’s family.The lawsuit said the county assured Melanie the potential foster child had no history of sexual misconduct, mental illness or any history of wrongdoing.The suit claims that social services concealed the child's past issues and put her sons in unreasonable harm.According to Melanie’s lawyer, Melanie "asked social services whether or not these children had any type of mental health issues, had any previous history of being sexually abused or any previous history of sexually acting out and all answers to those questions were no.”Court documents claim about a month after taking the child into her home the child began to act out, including incidents such as smearing feces on the wall and downloading and watching pornography. Court documents stated that the child “took one of the boys’ cell phones and again downloaded homosexual child pornography.”Then things escalated.The suit claims there were several incidents of sexual violence against the other children in the home over the next year.Melanie says her son was traumatized and is still in counseling trying to deal with it.After each incident, Melanie said she reached out to county social services employees seeking help."Sometimes there was no response at all,” Melanie said. “Sometimes they said that they were going to place a report, I'd follow up on the report, I wouldn’t get any information.”According to a representative with the County of San Diego’s Child Welfare Services division, as of July 2017, there were more than 3,692 open child welfare cases and more than 2,365 kids placed in foster care, which is less than the year before There are 712 caseworkers but not everyone directly handles a foster child's case.Although there is no mandate for how many cases a social worker can carry the county says caseloads are monitored and assigned on a monthly basis. Case count per caseworker often fluctuates based on changing circumstances of every case.A spokesperson for the county denied all interview requests for this story. However, attorneys for the county did respond to the lawsuit in a court filing asking that it be dismissed.The response noted the records in the county's possession at the time the foster child was placed in the home didn't include any information that would have alerted them that the child may pose a risk of harm.They also claim there are no factual allegations to support that they failed to take appropriate action. After each incident, they did take action by filing a report and commencing an investigation, according to the county's court filing.Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin asked San Diego attorney Shawn McMillan if it’s surprising to see allegations like the ones in Melanie’s complaint against San Diego County and the foster system. “No, no the foster system not just in San Diego County, but statewide is completely and totally broken,” McMillan said. McMillan is one of only a handful of attorneys in California who specializes in child welfare cases. He said one of the most significant problems in the system is that everything is done in secret."I've dealt with San Diego County for a long time,” he said. “These specific attorneys defending this case, I have cases with them right now, and it's typical to see what they're doing here, it's blame assignment, denial -- a refusal to be held accountable.”According to Melanie's lawsuit, the district attorney's office filed felony delinquency charges against the foster child for sexual abuse, after the placement with Melanie.Melanie said had she known the child's history there's no way the placement would have taken place. 4928

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - We're all feeling it every time we go to the pump, and some new numbers reveal how much lighter our wallets are.Every time Stephanie Sicat gets in the car for her commute from San Marcos to Kearny Mesa for her job as a radio producer, thoughts of work are not the only thing on her mind."Consciously thinking of gas, gas, gas," said Sicat.In all, Sicat spends about 0 dollars in gas every week.  She's hardly alone.  We looked at those gas costs in terms of your commute.  According to a scientific 10News/Union Tribune poll, 38% of county residents say they're spending between and 0 a month in gas on the commute.  31% are spending between 0 and 0.  And 10 percent are forking over more than 0 every month.  For Sicat, all those numbers add up to some major belt tightening."I'd say after paying for bills and rent, a third of what remains goes to gas," said Sicat.Sicat says eating out is now basically a special occasion thing.  She says even shopping for little things has become a math problem."Socks, toothpaste ... mouthwash, personal things I need around the house, I can't spend on those because I have to spend on gas," said Sicat.On May 14, the average national price of regular gas was .87. In San Diego, the figure was almost one dollar higher, according to AAA.  Gas prices are volatile. GasBuddy.com has been tracking price fluctuations related to politics. Gas prices rose nationwide last week following news of President Trump’s Iran withdrawal.“Some of the factors at play in the rising prices: President Trump’s withdraws the U.S. from the nuclear deal with Iran and oil supplies that have continued to drop as U.S. exports surpass Venezuela—a surprising feat given Venezuela has the largest proven oil reserves in the world. In addition, as money continues to flow into commodities as bets for higher oil prices rise, there’s a strong chance of seeing crude oil prices continue to rally in the weeks ahead, with the odds of hitting /gallon nationally now better than 65% just in time for the summer driving season,” said Patrick DeHaan, head of petroleum analysis for GasBuddy. HOW TO SAVE MONEYWatch how you drive!  Fuel economy starts with steady speeds, because cars burn extra fuel during acceleration. Decelerate by coasting whenever possible. Also, use air conditioning conservatively to reduce the cooling demand on your car.Get your car prepped to save gas. Removing unnecessary items can lighten your car and make it more fuel efficient. Keeping tires properly inflated and routinely maintaining the car will keep the engine at peak performance. Edmunds found that 'calm' driving and maintenance could save a combined 38 percent on fuel.Buy your gas at the right time. GasBuddy analyzed gas prices for the first quarter of 2018 and found the best days to fill ‘er up. In California, Tuesday was the cheapest day to buy gas, while Friday was the most expensive. The best time to drive to the pump was between 8 and 10 a.m.Shop around. GasBuddy tracks the cheapest gas in your neighborhood.  Are you feeling the gas price pinch? Email us at tips@10news.com. 3210

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - With summer break approaching, students and parents at Cathedral Catholic High School are pushing to be heard by the school's administration. This comes a week after school leaders decided the girls will not be allowed to wear skirts next year. Students, along with their parents, have been protesting since Monday. Parents tell 10News the push is much more than just the students being allowed to wear skirts. "We just want an opportunity to be heard," says parent Michelle Adams. "The girls would like to wear skirts. It's been a tradition here at the school for forever."It's been one week since the students and parents found out about the changes to next year's dress code. The girls will only be allowed to wear pants, capri pants, and Bermuda shorts. Parents say they wish the school would have included them before making the decision. "It's not so much about the skirts but about the process and the fact that this mandate was just dropped down on high without really consulting," says parent Matthew Boyd. "Our principals are both men," says 10th grade student Samantha Conant. "They don't understand. It's so unfair how they handled the whole thing."Since the memo went out last Friday, parents say the administration has been inaccessible. 10News reached out to the Catholic Diocese about the changes in the dress code for next year. We are still waiting on a response. Summer break is just three days away. Parents say they are still working to meet with the Catholic Diocese and the school's administration on the issue. 1562

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Video captured shots ringing out, apparently pelting cars in a Rolando neighborhood, including the vehicles of a family already impacted by the pandemic.A shattered windshield is what Ondria Aviles found when she went to her Dodge Journey, parked outside her home along Marraco Drive on Monday night."Just couldn't believe that had happened," said Aviles.Her husband came out and found the driver side window of his truck - also parked on the street - was also shattered."My husband had a BB pellet hole in his window," said Aviles.Turns the moments their vehicles were vandalized were captured by neighbor Ryan Dick's surveillance camera. Just before 7:30 that night, a red sedan was recorded driving through when three shots rang out in a span of three seconds. The final two shots sounded near Aviles' vehicles.According to posts on the Nextdoor app, at least four other cars and homes were struck in a several-mile stretch. "Couldn't imagine if they missed and hit someone, a young child. We have three kids," said Aviles.Along with her outrage, there is frustration. The bill for the window damage will be a hardship. Because of the pandemic, she's been furloughed for several months. Her husband's work hours reduced."This is the worst time this could happen, in our current situation," said Aviles.That mystery car is believed to be a maroon Lexus IS. Anyone with information in the case is asked to call San Diego Police at 619-531-2000. 1472

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- We know the importance of wearing a mask to protect the nose and mouth from the novel coronavirus, but some new research is raising questions about whether the general public should wear goggles, glasses or a shield to protect their eyes.The CDC already urges healthcare workers to wear eye protection. The agency updated its guidance in July, encouraging even healthcare workers in low-transmission environments to wear eye protection when it was previously listed as “optional.”Experts think the nose is still the main entry point for the virus because of the mechanics of breathing, but the surface of the eye is lined with the same mucous membrane to which the virus likes to bind.Animal studies have shown SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can enter through the eyes and there have been viral particles detected in human tears, but there’s no clear-cut data so far showing the eyes are a major entry point, said ophthalmologist Dr. Annie Nguyen at the USC Roski Eye Institute.However, some observational studies have suggested protecting the eyes may lower the risk of infection.In June, a study in the Journal Lancet suggested face shields, goggles and glasses could lower the risk of infection from 16 percent to 6 percent.Another study published this month suggests that simply wearing eyeglasses could help.Researchers examined 276 hospitalized patients in Suizhou, China. Based on trends in that region, they expected about 31 percent of the patients would wear eyeglasses. Instead, just 5 percent of the hospitalized patients wore glasses.The researchers noted the observational study had limitations, but theorized that eyeglasses may offer a protective barrier against the virus.“I wouldn’t be quick to make the recommendation for everyone to run out and wear glasses,” Dr. Nguyen said.An editorial published alongside the eyeglasses study urged caution. “Although it is tempting to conclude from this study that everyone should wear eyeglasses, goggles, or a face shield in public to protect their eyes and themselves from COVID-19, from an epidemiological perspective, we must be careful to avoid inferring a causal relationship from a single observational study,” wrote Dr. Lisa Maragakis at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.Experts say more evidence is needed because urging people to wear eye protection could have harmful side effects, like causing the wearer to inadvertently touch their face more frequently.“If there is additional evidence that builds up, then that’s the point that we change guidelines,” said Dr. Christian Ramers of Family Health Centers of San Diego.“People have had whiplash from things changing and going back and forth,” he added, citing the change in guidelines on face coverings.Still, some experts say people with underlying conditions should consider adding eye protection, as long as they’re careful not to touch their face.Doctors have suggested that people who wear contact lenses might want to switch to eyeglasses to cut down on the number of times they touch their eyes, but Dr. Nguyen said there’s no hard data yet showing contact lens-wearers are at greater risk from the virus. 3184

来源：资阳报