成都静脉曲张的手术费用(成都那家医院治疗精索静脉曲张) (今日更新中)

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. -- The NCAA opened the door for college athletes to get paid from use of their name, image and likeness in a major shift in the rules governing collegiate sports.While some view this as a step in the right direction, others think this could lead to more problems.What this means is that college athletes will now be able to make money from sales of jerseys, commercials and signing endorsements.NCAA board members have asked each division to create new rules no later than January 2021.The rule will affect 1,1000 member schools encompassing nearly 500,000 athletes.This decision came one month after California passed a law allowing players to profit off their name which takes place in California in 2023.“As a national governing body, the NCAA is uniquely positioned to modify its rules to ensure fairness and a level playing field for student-athletes,” the association president Mark Emmert said in a statement. “The board’s action creates a path to enhance opportunities for student-athletes while ensuring they compete against students and not professionals.”This decision is currently being debated whether it’s a step in the right direction.Brian Gearity, a professor of sports coaching at the University of Denver, is an advocate for college athletes getting paid.“The idea that now we’re able to let athletes be compensated for their own images like we would anyone else is a good thing,” Gearity said. “Is it opening the floodgates to something else or power shifting – absolutely.” Before this new ruling, athletes did not see any profit for any type of memorabilia sold with their names on it.New York has a similar bill to California; however, it is proposing athletes could see 15 percent of the profits.“There’s going to be bumps in the road and there’s fear and anxiety and still people holding onto their power,” Gearity said. “But the point is to not get distracted. The ultimate goals are this is going to be a fairer and more equitable thing.”Cody McDavis, a former Division I basketball player for the University of Northern Colorado disagrees.McDavis said that he believes the NCAA did the right thing by making this a national ruling after California passed its law.“What you have if only one state has this is a huge recruiting advantage,” McDavis said. “But I still don’t think this is a fair and equitable ruling. What happens when we have student athletes receiving more than their teammates for the same amount of work on the team? What happens when we have women that are not being paid at all but are as equally deserving as their men counterparts?” McDavis said other sports like swimming, soccer and track could be left behind in the profits. “We’re talking about men’s basketball and football here,” McDavis said. “We’re talking about the best athletes in those sports. The truth is, there are options for those athletes. And it’s called the NFL or the NBA.”Joe Goldhammer, a professor of sports law and labor law, said this isn’t the final solution.He believes this could push athletes to a similar direction that was shot down at Northwestern University which is to create a union.“The Devil is in the details,” Goldhammer said. “The specifics of that are going to be very hard to work out and very complicated. The problem with this whole system is that it lacks equality and lacks fairness for the players. And you’re going to create another level of unfairness if we’re not careful. College athletes have been exploited over the years. The best thing for them is to stand up for themselves sand say what’s best for them and form a labor union.” 3615

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — As the country continues to battle the spread of coronavirus, many nursing homes are encouraging visitors to stay away to protect the elderly and at-risk populations from the virus. 212

Just months ago, 70-year-old Dr. Frank Meza finished the Los Angeles Marathon in what would have been a record-beating time for his age group: 2 hours, 53 minutes and 10 seconds.On Thursday he was found dead in the Los Angeles River under a bridge about a mile from Dodger Stadium, days after 305

Italian restaurant chain Olive Garden is denying that it has made contributions to President Donald Trump's campaign as thousands have called for a boycott of Olive Garden. It all started over the weekend after a now-deleted tweet claimed Olive Garden has contributed to Trump's campaign. After the tweet went viral, thousands on Twitter and Facebook used the hashtag #BoycottOliveGarden to spread the word. On Monday, Olive Garden fired back on its Twitter account. "We don’t know where this information came from, but it is incorrect," Olive Garden tweeted. "Our company does not donate to presidential candidates."According to the Federal Election Commission, it appears the accusations that Olive Garden and its parent company Darden supported Trump were false. Corporations are forbidden in directly contributing to elections, according to FEC guidelines.Previously, Darden operated a Political Action Committee that many top executives contributed to. According to government filings, the Darden Restaurants, Inc. Employees Good Government Fund PAC made significant contributions to a number of Republican and Democrat leaders. In the 2013-14 election cycle, the fund made contributions to both the Democratic and Republican House and Senate election committees. At the end of 2015, Darden announced it was ending the PAC.Although Darden and Olive Garden cannot make contributions directly, many top executives for Darden have made individual political contributions. According to FEC filings, only one of the 19 Darden executives listed on its website made a contribution to a presidential campaign since 2015. Susan Connelly, a Darden Senior VP, contributed ,700 to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign ((,000 to Hillary Victory Fund, ,700 to Hillary for America)). She also made a ,500 National Republican Senate Committee contribution and a ,300 donation to the Democratic National Committee. 1919

INDIANAPOLIS — If you're one of the millions of people struggling to pay back your student loans, you know there's no easy solution. At least, not by yourself. But a crowdfunding app called Givling has pulled together hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Their ultimate goal? To be able to pay off a student loan every single day. While they aren't quite there yet, Givling has grown significantly over the past year, and they've given out more than .5 million in loan and mortgage help to people across the country. One person Givling has helped is Indiana University graduate Erin Smith, who says one big win on the app enabled her to put a down payment on a home for her and her little girl. "I first heard about Givling on the news, when one of the first loan payoffs was a guy in Indy a couple of years ago," Smith said. That Hoosier winner she is referring to is Jordan Shelton. He won ,407 in July 2017 to pay off his student loans. Shelton was just the second person to have his loans paid off by the crowdfunding app, which has now funded more than 35 loans and paid out thousands of dollars in trivia and random prizes."I downloaded it and began playing, participating at that time," Smith said. "My main goal was to get into the funding spot someday. I have a decent amount of student loan debt, that seems a bit overwhelming."And that's still a goal for Smith, but while she works her way up the queue toward the winner's circle, playing Givling proved to be more than just a chance at student loan relief — it helped her start her new life with her 3-year-old daughter. "I never thought of winning via trivia because I wasn't very good," Smith said. "I watched as Givling was growing, gaining more momentum, then started telling everyone who would listen about it. Most people wrote me off or called it a scam, but I got a few people to sign up. In October of last year, I was at work telling people about Givling and playing my free plays on my break. That's when I noticed I was on a team with high scores. My score was only 360, and the other two players each had a score of 10,250. That put us in first place for that week's trivia."That score was enough to win Smith and her two randomly paired trivia teammates a cool ,391 each. With the money she won from playing trivia on Givling, Smith was able to close on her first home last month. "I received a check a few weeks later," the mother said. "At the time I had been saving up for a down payment to buy a house," Smith said. I'm a single mom ... My No. 1 goal was to get us a home of our own. The money I won went toward that goal."I still play daily and still have hope of getting into the funding spot or random draw to have my student loans paid off. I love Givling and love what they do."Smith isn't alone, Hoosiers from Avon, Indianapolis, Frankfort, Lafayette and South Bend are just some of the thousands of winners who have won cash prizes and paid off all or some of their student loans by playing trivia on their phone. Givling has paid out more than .5 million to users since it started in 2015. The app isn't like most online games with big prizes. Each player gets two free games per day. Users have the option to purchase "coins" to play extra trivia games, but you don't need to buy anything to win. "I started playing Givling about a year and a half ago," Purdue University graduate Amanda Jeffries said. "I saw a few posts on Facebook from an old high school classmate and looked into it and decided to join. I didn't play a lot at the beginning, but then I started to play daily."For each ,000 loan that's paid off, Givling also chooses two random winners who each get ,000. That money can either go toward your student loans or your mortgage. Jeffries isn't at the top of the queue to get her loan funded and she didn't win at trivia, but she did win that ,000 just for being a Givling member and playing her free plays each day. She found out she had won after receiving a surprise phone call. "I was very excited to get the call," Jeffries said. "I ignored the first call since I didn't know the number and I was at work. They called right back, so I answered that time."Jeffries chose to put that ,000 toward her student loan debt, which she says is a lot more manageable and a lot less daunting now, thanks to Givling. "It helped bring my loan balance to just over ,000. So obviously, not having to worry much about that loan is wonderful," Jeffries said. "We're going to pay the rest of mine off quickly, then focus on my husband's loans."That's the premise of Givling; the startup has dedicated itself to stamping out student loan debt one student at a time. Givling is funded through partnerships, ads, games and "coin" purchases made by members. Those coins can be used to play more than the two free trivia games you get each day. The app has nearly 400,000 registered users, which may seem a little daunting if you're just jumping in. But Seth Beard, chief marketing officer for the company, says the queue is only one part of what they do. "We encourage new users to focus on the big weekly trivia cash prizes as well as the ,000 random drawing," Beard said. "The queue is not a sprint, rather a marathon, and will take time to climb. While the trivia cash prizes and random drawings are more frequent and someone who joins today can, essentially, take advantage of those right away."Just this week, Givling awarded more than ,000 in trivia prizes, completed funding on a ,000 student loan and awarded a ,000 prize for the random drawing. "As we continue to grow, we'll expand the prizes. There will be more frequent random ,000 drawings, and we may have two or three trivia cash payout periods through the week instead of just one. Therefore, more prizes for new users," Beard said. "Plus, the past two weeks have had trivia winners with a score of just 10 points, or one question right. You never know how the computer will pair the team since it's all random."For more information visit the 6092

来源：资阳报