山东睡觉时抽搐安徽看癫痫病挂什么科,青岛看羊癫疯病的医院在哪里,青岛好的儿童医院羊羔疯专病,河南儿童癫痫病医院哪家治疗效果好,济宁治疗癫痫新技术,江苏医院羊羔疯专病哪治得好,江苏癫痫怎样治疗好

A California man was arrested over the weekend after allegedly making a mass shooting threat to get out of going to a county fair with his parents, authorities said Saturday.According to the Pomona Police Department, Erik Villasenor emailed the Los Angeles County Fair staff on Friday afternoon and made false threats of violence.Pomona Police Chief Mike Olivieri said the email read, "Hello I was told that someone was planning on doing a mass shooting on Sunday at the fairgrounds. I just wanted to inform you guys already."The Sylmar, California, resident was suppose to go to the fair with his parents Sunday, Olivieri said at a press conference. Investigators believe he sent the threat in order to get out of going to the event with his family."Though he's 22, he felt it was appropriate to send this threat ... we believe it was with the intent it would spark some chaos and commotion, be captured on the media, and use it as an excuse to his parents to not go to the fair," Olivieri said at the Saturday press conference.Villasenor admitted it was a hoax when authorities tracked him down, police said."This is a great outcome for the fair and it really provided us an opportunity to test the kind of security systems we have worked so hard to create," said Miguel Santana, the president and CEO of Fairplex, the venue where the fair is held.Villasenor was arrested on a charge of making false threats and was booked at the Pomona County Jail. His bail is set at ,000.According to inmate information from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Villasenor has a court date set for Tuesday. 1617

WASHINGTON -- Aileen is a dreamer – in other words, an immigrant who entered the United States illegally with her parents many years ago. “We came to the United States when I was about one year old. I was a little baby so when I say this is home, it is home for me,” Aileen said. Aileen says her family was trying to escape violence in Mexico. “They just wanted to make sure that I grew up in an environment that would help me thrive, and their decision was the United States,” Aileen said. Graduating second in her high school class, Aileen says she’s been able to experience opportunity her parents were never afforded. Now she hopes to help others, so she’s studying to become a mental health counselor. “I mean just waking up every day in a country that doesn’t want you here takes its toll,” Aileen said. In the Immigration Services office, she’s already using her education and expertise as a student employee. “A lot of the times students come in just wanting to vent,” Aileen said. Right now, Aileen and other DACA recipients say they’re experiencing a lot of anxiety as the Supreme Court deliberates on their fate. DACA – which stands for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – is an immigration policy that was established during the Obama Administration. Applicants who don’t have a serious criminal history can live and work legally in the U.S. for renewable two-year periods. However, the Trump Administration has been criticizing it for years, saying it’s unlawful. And now the Supreme Court is considering whether or not the program should continue. “It’s important to know that it’s never 100% known what the Supreme Court is going to decide,” attorney Jerry Lopez said. DACA recipients have been meeting with immigration attorneys trying to understand the impact the Supreme Court’s decision could have on their lives. Although a final decision isn’t expected until late spring or early summer of 2020. “The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case challenging the ability of President Trump to end DACA,” attorney David Fine said. David Fine is on the general counsel at MSU Denver. He’s been keeping a close eye on the Supreme Court proceedings. “Based on briefings I’ve received and the reports about oral argument that I’ve seen, my guess is the Supreme Court likely will uphold President Trump’s ability to end DACA, but the basis of that decision will be important,” Fine said. He says depending on what the court decides, current DACA students might be able to keep their status until their two years are up. Or, their status and protection could end immediately. “Technically yes, a DACA recipient could be deported after the program has ended,” Fine said. As the country waits for the Supreme Court’s decision, dreamers are trying to hold onto hope. If DACA is taken away, there’s still a chance congress could pass the DREAM Act, which would actually give dreamers a path to citizenship – something DACA can’t do. Aileen says she knows where she belongs, and she’s optimistic she will eventually get the documentation so many take for granted.“I’ve grown into the person I am now by being here in America, and I can’t even imagine like being in another country that doesn’t necessarily feel like home anymore,” Aileen said. 3269

A federal judge has ordered US Customs and Border Protection to permit health experts into detention facilities holding migrant children to ensure they're "safe and sanitary" and assess the children's medical needs.The order encompasses all facilities in the CBP's El Paso and Rio Grande Valley sectors, which are the subject of a lawsuit.Last week, lawyers asked US District Judge Dolly Gee to hold President Donald Trump's administration in contempt and order immediate improvements at the facilities. The lawyers are part of a team of doctors and advocates that warned last week of what they said were major health and hygiene problems at Customs and Border Protection facilities in Texas following visits to the facilities."Children are held for weeks in deplorable conditions, without access to soap, clean water, showers, clean clothing, toilets, toothbrushes, adequate nutrition or adequate sleep. The children, including infants and expectant mothers, are dirty, cold, hungry and sleep-deprived," the court filing said.Gee, who sits on the federal bench in California, made the ruling Friday, despite Attorney General William Barr and other defendants' request that the court "set a schedule for briefing these issues that provides defendants with a full and fair opportunity to respond to the allegations that plaintiffs have lodged against them."Gee set a deadline of July 12 for the parties to "file a joint status report regarding their mediation efforts and what has been done to address post haste the conditions described."Judge cites previous violationsThe detention centers have become a political volleyball, with critics likening them to concentration camps and torture facilities, while supporters say they're necessary to an effective immigration policy.At issue is the 1997 Flores Agreement, which sets standards for detaining child migrants and requires the government to release children to their parents, adult relatives or licensed programs without unnecessary delay."The Court has already issued several orders that have set forth in detail what it considers to be violations of the Flores Agreement," Gee wrote in her Friday ruling. "Thus, the parties need not use divining tools to extrapolate from those orders what does or does not constitute non-compliance. The Court has made that clear beyond peradventure."The judge cited a July 2015 order chronicling "widespread and deplorable conditions in holding cells" and a June 2017 order documenting "unsanitary conditions at certain CBP facilities.""Plaintiffs claim that CBP has continued to commit many of the same violations years later," Gee wrote.The judge wrote in the order that she is aware that a sudden influx of migrants presents challenges and that the conditions at the facilities are not static, but the 1997 agreement demands defendants compose a plan outlining its efforts "to place all minors as expeditiously as possible.""If 22 years has not been sufficient time for Defendants to refine that plan in a manner consistent with their 'concern for the particular vulnerability of minors' and their obligation to maintain facilities that are consistently 'safe and sanitary,' it is imperative that they develop such a comprehensive plan forthwith," Gee wrote, using italics for emphasis.Teens describe desperationAmong the detention centers in question is a Clint, Texas, facility that reporters toured on Wednesday, but were barred from taking any photographs or video.While border patrol officials showed journalists pallets of food, boxes of toiletries and children playing soccer and braiding hair, a CBP source with firsthand knowledge of the facility told CNN, "Typical. The agency prepped for you guys."Lawyers in Flores v. Barr presented as exhibits dozens of anecdotes from children and teen mothers complaining of mistreatment, filthy conditions and lack of access to clothing, adequate food and medical care."I am in a room with dozens of other boys," a 17-year-old told lawyers fighting for the migrant children. "Some have been as young as 3 or 4 years old. Some cry. Right now, there is a 12-year-old who cries a lot. Others try to comfort him. One of the officers makes fun of those who cry."A 15-year-old girl from El Salvador said, "A Border Patrol agent came in our room with a 2-year-old boy and asked us, 'Who wants to take care of this little boy?' Another girl said she would take care of him but lost interest after a few hours and so I started taking care of him. ... I feed the 2-year-old boy, change his diaper and play with him. He is sick. He has a cough and a runny nose and scabs on his lips."Dr. Dolly Lucio Sevier, who interviewed 39 children, likened the conditions in the detention centers to "torture facilities," according to a court filing."That is, extreme cold temperatures, lights on 24 hours a day, no adequate access to medical care, basic sanitation, water or adequate food," the pediatrician said. "All 39 detainees had no access to hand-washing during their entire time in custody, including no hand-washing available after bathroom use." 5088

“These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!” https://t.co/GDwAydcAOw— The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 29, 2020 359

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Streets are far emptier than normal in cities and towns across America. It’s the most visual example of how the coronavirus is impacting daily life. At the root of that: orders to stay home. “The authority lies with the governor and in a number of jurisdictions that authority can also be devolved down to mayors,” said Meryl Chertoff, executive director of Georgetown Law’s Project on State and Local Government Policy and Law. She said things like stay-at-home orders, curfews and non-essential business closings, all have legal footing. “There is some question as to whether these are voluntary at this point, or whether they are mandatory, but there is no doubt that if you took these to court right now, they would be sustained by a court,” she said. They are also enforceable, she said. If you were to break the law, you’d likely be charged with a misdemeanor. However, Chertoff said there is something even bigger she is keeping an eye on. “What I am more concerned about, candidly, are the violation of civil rights of individual and loss of the right to travel,” she said. “So, one of the things that I've been thinking about is what about the right to cross state lines.” There are a growing number of state rules now in place about travel. Hawaii has asked all visitors to stay away for 30-days. Alaska wants anyone entering the state from the “outside” to self-quarantine for 14 days. The governor of Texas is now ordering people coming in from New York City or New Orleans to self-quarantine for 14 days. Florida’s governor asked people traveling in from New York – or who have in the past three weeks—as well as Louisiana, to also self-quarantine. “This is important because, after all the hard work, we don’t want it to now to get seeded, as people flee kind of the ‘hot zone,’” said Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Florida. Whether any of travel requests or restrictions are enforceable is a question, Chertoff said, as similar orders that had come before the courts in previous years only applied to an individual, or a small group. “What enforcement capacities the states have is an open legal question because we've never been in a situation where there are large numbers of people potentially infected,” she said.It’s a situation that the nation might be forced to grapple with in the weeks – and possibly months – to come. 2365