吉林阴茎异常勃起的主要症状(吉林包皮水肿怎么治疗) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Capt. Andy Williams, Commander of the California Highway Patrol Oceanside Station, is under investigation after his arrest for suspicion of domestic violence.ABC 10News obtained the request for a restraining order against Williams, filed by his ex-wife. In the court documents, she details an argument the two got into at his home in Carlsbad Oct. 19. She claims he struck her near her buttocks with enough force to leave a hand mark and welts.Carlsbad police confirmed to ABC 10News that they arrested Williams. A spokesperson for the District Attorney tells ABC 10News they are investigating the case to decide whether to file charges.Williams is out on bail. CHP has placed him on administrative leave and removed his powers as a peace officer.CHP Border Commander Chief Omar Watson sent ABC 10News a statement:"The CHP is aware of the arrest of Capt. Andy Williams by the Carlsbad Police Department for alleged behavior that occurred while the employee was off duty. The CHP continues to fully cooperate with the investigating agency and we are conducting our own investigation into the allegations. I want to assure the public that we take any allegation of misconduct by our employees, whether on or off duty, very seriously.I also want to emphasize to the public that the alleged conduct of this employee does not reflect the values, hard work, dedication and professionalism of the CHP and its more than 11,000 employees, who proudly work each day to provide the best in Safety, Service, and Security to the people of California." 1566

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - As the Valley Fire raged across parts of eastern San Diego County, emergency assistance workers put into action plans they'd been working on for months to handle the dual disaster of a wildfire during a pandemic."It completely changed our approach," says Red Cross Regional CEO Sean Mahoney.The Red Cross has been planning and training for months, knowing this situation would likely arise this fall.Mahoney says their plan included Temporary Evacuation Points instead of group shelters, hotel rooms for people who needed somewhere to stay, grab and go or delivery meals, and an emphasis on sanitation and health screenings to keep volunteers and evacuees safe."We planned for this as much as we possibly could, but exercise is just an exercise. Doing the real thing is where you have those real lessons learned," Mahoney says.During the Valley Fire, the Red Cross assisted 440 people in 174 families. They served around 9,000 meals and snacks.Mahoney says his staff's dedication, along with 107 volunteers who worked 12-hour shifts, helped things go smoothly.But not everything went according to plan. On the first night of evacuations, the Red Cross ran out of hotel rooms, especially for people who had pets. Some evacuees without RVs had to sleep in their cars.Mahoney says the busy Labor Day Weekend, combined with hotel capacity restrictions because of the coronavirus, leads to fewer available rooms.To make sure it doesn't happen again, Mahoney says the Red Cross is already working on backup plans to open limited group shelters, with social distancing put in place to keep people apart. He told 10News they've already scouted hundreds of locations around San Diego.Meanwhile, the San Diego Humane Society also put in new protocols for safety during the pandemic. They helped hundreds of animals during the Valley Fire, and say the most significant challenges were limiting contact with owners and making sure their field teams followed the rules about distancing and wearing masks."The more people you interact with, the more likely you are to come in contact with somebody who is transmitting coronavirus," says Lt. John Peaveler. "So, we've had our biggest safety precautions on that side."Both groups say they'll take all the Valley Fire experience and put it to use in the next disaster. Since wildfire season is just beginning, they're sure it will come in handy. 2405

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — As San Diego sporting associations work to recruit new officials, they're up against abuse from parents and fans.The problem has gotten so bad that one youth soccer referee created a Facebook page to call out the bad behavior, parent shaming in hopes to address the problem nationwide.Kia Dehpanah has been officiating in San Diego for 25 years. While he does hear complaints from the sideline, he says younger referees deal with it the most.RELATED: Eastlake Little League responds to Park View player eligibility complaint"After a while, these young referees say, 'I don't need this aggravation,'" said Dehpanah.Last year, some youth sports like field hockey and lacrosse had to cancel some games due to not enough referees. These sports face additional recruiting challenges like finding officials who can work early games. There's also a misconception you must have prior knowledge of the sport beforehand."It's not the most glorified profession, it's a tough profession, but I think it has a lot of rewards too," said San Diego CIF Commissioner, Jerry Schniepp.Alicia Oswald, on the San Diego Girl's Lacrosse Umpiring Board, uses officiating as a way to give back to the community. She hopes parents and fans will hear this message so that potential recruits aren't too intimidated to go after the job."We are people too, we are humans," said Oswald. "We are doing our best and our focus is to keep the game safe for the girls."You can learn more about different officiating opportunities here.Girl's lacrosse has an upcoming training session; you can email Oswald for more information: aliciaoswald@gmail.com. 1642

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Body-worn cameras are now in widespread use across San Diego County.They catch some of the most controversial and impactful moments of police officer interactions with the public.As part of the Team 10 Transparency Project, 10News set out to learn more about local departments policies and what type of impact the cameras are having in the community."Body-worn camera, in my opinion, is just another piece of evidence to what occurred," said San Diego County Sheriff's Department Sergeant Rob Samuels.Under Senate Bill 1421, a recent law enforcement transparency law, the San Diego County Sheriff's Department released a handful of body-worn camera recordings.The recordings are the end product, capturing moments that could be used in court to prosecute a suspect, exonerate a member of law enforcement or sue a department.But to get to that end, departments have laid out policies that guide how and when to use the cameras."Whenever a deputy is anticipating they are going to be taking some enforcement action they should be turning it on," Samuels said.The Sheriff's Department policy is only a few pages, but it covers everything from training to camera position, when and where to record, and rules for reviewing that video.According to the policy, "Deputies/community services officers shall activate the [body worn camera] BWC to record all law enforcement related contacts. While away from department facilities, deputies shall keep their BWC powered on and in stand-by mode."MORE LIKE THIS Police expert says improvements needed in law enforcement complaint processExclusive: How San Diego law enforcement responds to mental health crisesInvestigating Officers: How SDPD investigates its own after an officer-Involved shootingAccording to the policy, deputies will typically not allow citizens to review recordings; however, deputy discretion is allowed to replay the recording for citizens at the scene to mitigate possible minor complaints."On average, we see about 60 minutes of recording per camera per day and at any given time and point we have about 250 cameras out in the field," said San Diego County Sheriff's Department Chief Information Officer Ashish Kakkad.Kakkad said deputies are allowed to review only their body camera recordings. Access is extremely limited.The policy states, "A deputy may not review the BWC video of other involved deputies before writing a report or giving a statement unless necessary for evidentiary purposes and with the express permission of a supervisor."It's very much a role-based access," Kakkad said. "What is your role? What are you doing? What is your function? And based on your function, your appropriate access is determined."Kakkad said no deputy has the power to edit or delete video.In the two years, the body-worn camera program has been up and running, the department hasn't deleted any video, he said.The heads of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department's program believe it's been a good thing.But are cameras doing anything to bridge the gap between the public and the people they serve?"You won't really ever know what it may have prevented in the way of a complaint," Samuels said.Numbers do show substantiated and unsubstantiated complaints are down for the Sheriff's Department.10News wanted to see if body cameras had an impact on how San Diego County law enforcement interacts with the public.Team 10 requested use of force data dating back five years from departments across the county.Use of force is the type of action law enforcement uses to mitigate an incident, make an arrest, or protect themselves or others from harm.Here's what we found from departments that have responded to our request at the time of this writing.Oceanside initially saw a significant increase in use of force in 2018 when the cameras were deployed. Although officials tell us it was a staggered deployment. So far this year, use of force numbers show a significant decrease.In the three years since El Cajon deployed body-worn cameras use of force increased. The department said use of force numbers could increase for several reasons, and there also may be no direct correlation between those numbers and body-worn cameras. In San Diego, a 2017 report noted that since officers began wearing body cameras, there were fewer instances of greater controlling/defending force, a reduction in complaints and allegations, and de-escalation of some situations.While statistics vary, the Sheriff's Department said the cameras are just another tool."We still do business like we've always done business, we write accurate reports, and the video we record on body-worn camera just supports what the deputy writes," Samuels said. 4707

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- As Gloria Rickerd flipped through the pages of her wedding album in her Mira Mesa home, she said the chemotherapy medications her husband takes has kept him alive longer than doctors anticipated.But like many Americans -- nearly one in eight, according to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study -- she thinks the cost of those drugs is unreasonable."I walked into the pharmacy at UC San Diego, and they looked at me said that will be 0. It was like four or five pills," she said. "It’s like, ok so, this is what you want me to pay and if I can’t do that, I guess he’ll just die?"On Friday, Gov. Gavin Newsom laid out several healthcare proposals designed to lower prescription drug costs, including a plan to make California the first state to make its own generic prescription drugs.The Democratic governor wants the nation’s most populous state to contract with generic drug companies to make medications on its behalf so it could sell them to its nearly 40 million residents. The goal is to lower prices by increasing competition in the generic drug market, Newsom said.The state is still determining which drugs it will manufacture, but Newsom hinted that insulin was "top of mind."His proposal also would create a single market for drug pricing in California, with companies having to bid to sell their medicine at a uniform price. One expert said that piece would have the bigger impact."Other countries control or negotiate the price of drugs, and if there is one state that could do it, it’s California, which is the size of a country,” said Larry Levitt, executive vice president of health policy for the Kaiser Family Foundation. “A drug company could walk away from Rhode Island. It’s much harder to walk away from California.”Lawmakers would have to approve the proposals before they could become law. A legislative leader in charge of reviewing the plan gave a tentative endorsement Thursday.“If Costco can have a Kirkland brand, why can’t California have our own generic brand?” said Democratic Assemblyman Joaquin Arambula, an emergency room doctor from Fresno who chairs the House Budget Subcommittee on Health and Human Services. “I really do think there is quite a bit of merit in having us produce the medications."Priscilla VanderVeer, vice president of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, which represents brand-name drug companies, said she’s waiting for more details from Newsom before commenting.A representative from the Association for Accessible Medicines, which represents generic drug manufacturers, did not respond to a request for comment."I have more questions than I do have answers," said Tatiana Fassieux of California Health Advocates. "It is a very good first step but I would not see any end result coming up soon because it is going to take time."The drug plan is part of Newsom’s budget proposal, which he presented to lawmakers Friday.Newsom’s office did not say how much the drug proposal would cost, prompting criticism from some Republican lawmakers who said the state should not compete with private companies.“When the state runs it, it costs more money,” said Republican Assemblyman Devon Mathis, who’s also on the health subcommittee. “The money is coming out of families’ pockets paying all those crazy taxes.”California law requires drug companies to report any price increases to the state. Generic drugs saw a three-year median increase of 37.6%, according to a report from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. That analysis was based on the list prices of the drugs and did not include discounts or rebates.But the report doesn’t include generic drugs that decreased in price because companies are not required to report that. Nationally, generic drug prices have been decreasing overall, according to a report that AARP produced with the University of Minnesota.Supporters say California’s generic drug label could help lower the cost of a common drug that has steadily increased in price — insulin for diabetes patients. Three drug companies control most of the market for insulin.“Consumers would directly benefit if California contracted on its own to manufacture much-needed generic medications like insulin — a drug that has been around for a century yet the price has gone up over tenfold in the last few decades,” said Anthony Wright, executive director of Health Access California.Jon Roth, CEO of the California Pharmacists Association, said the state might be surprised, however, at how much it ends up charging for its own generic drugs because of factors beyond its control, including raw material shortages and disruptions in the supply chain.“There are other factors in the actual manufacturing that the state may not be able to escape,” he said.While most Americans get generic prescriptions, they only account for a small part of the total drug spending in the U.S. That’s because unlike the name-brand drug market, generics are very competitive, said Jeff Joyce, chairman of the Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics at USC’s School of Pharmacy. "What he is proposing to do would help in specific cases, but it’s not a panacea by any means,” Joyce said.The proposal is another step in Newsom’s effort to overhaul California’s prescription drug market. Last year, in one of his first acts in office, Newsom ordered the state to take over the Medicaid program’s prescription drug benefits, which affects 13 million people. 5477

来源：资阳报