吉林前列腺痛是由什么引起的吉林包皮过长有哪些治疗方法,吉林割包皮的哪家医院比较好,吉林拉包皮多少钱,吉林哪家做包皮切除做的权威,吉林做包皮包茎哪个医院好点儿,吉林医院做包皮手术大概多少钱,吉林割包皮医院哪个较好

(CNN) -- In a landmark ruling, a court in Mexico City has said two people should be allowed to use cocaine legally.The ruling means the unnamed pair can use, but not sell, small amounts of cocaine, according to Mexico United Against Crime (MUCD), an NGO that filed legal papers in the case as part of its strategy to change the country's drug policy.This is the first time cocaine use has been made legal in Mexico, but the ruling still needs to be ratified by a higher court.It comes at a time when Mexico is grappling with its drug policy under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, whose official development plan for 2019-2024 pledges to reform a "prohibitionist approach" that it calls "unsustainable" due to the "violence and poor public health outcomes" it has generated.The court ruling orders Mexico's national health regulator, Cofepris, to authorize two people to legally possess, transport and use cocaine.However, a Cofepris official told the AFP news agency that such an authorization is outside its remit, and it has blocked the court order as a result.The order was delivered in May but will now be reviewed by a tribunal, according to AFP.In a statement, MUCD emphasizes that the ruling will only be enforced if it is upheld by the tribunal, and underlines that it does not legalize cocaine.The organization said the ruling marks a new stage in the judiciary's understanding of drugs and offers an opportunity to call for an end to the war on drugs and the redistribution of public resources to fight other crimes."We have spent years working for a more secure, just and peaceful Mexico," said Lisa Sánchez, MUCD's director."This case is about insisting on the need to stop criminalizing users of drugs... and design better public policies that explore all the available options, including regulation."Mexico is a major transit point for cocaine en route to the United States, and trafficking gangs have grown in size and power thanks to the vast profits of the trade.The country's war on drugs began in 2006, when then-President Felipe Calderón sent in the army to fight traffickers.According to a 2018 US Congressional Research Service report, "many sources indicate" that about 150,000 intentional homicides in Mexico since 2006 were linked to organized crime.In 2018, Mexico recorded 33,341 homicides, the highest number since the country began keeping records.MUCD wants the government to reform drug policy as a way of improving public security and has also campaigned for changes to legislation on marijuana.In 2017, marijuana was legalized for medical and scientific purposes, and in November 2018 the Supreme Court ruled that a blanket ban on recreational use was unconstitutional, Reuters reports.That same month, López Obrador's government submitted a bill that would allow recreational use and create a medical marijuana industry, according to Reuters.For now, Cofepris grants permits to use marijuana on an individual basis.Gunther Baumgarten, editor at consultancy firm Latin News and Canning House associate, told CNN that any potential advance through the judicial system is likely to be a slow process.It took three years for the marijuana case to reach Mexico's supreme court, and judges could decide cocaine poses too much of a public health risk, he said.Plus, there is less of an economic incentive to act on cocaine than marijuana."In the case of marijuana there is already an international legal market but there is no such thing for cocaine," said Baumgarten.And López Obrador could be discouraged after calculating the political risk."He might get into some rocky territory," said Baumgarten, explaining that a majority of Mexicans were against the legalization of marijuana."It's not necessarily popular."Baumgarten also said "it's not clear" whether decriminalizing cocaine use would improve public security, as such a measure wouldn't affect drug smuggling to the US, which is the main driver of violence. 3959

(KGTV) – A bill to end the retail sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits in California is heading to Gov. Gavin Newsom's desk for approval.Assembly Bill 2152, known as "Bella’s Act," would ban the retail sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits, while allowing stores to partner with rescues and shelters for adoption events. The bill stops pet stores from receiving any money from adoption transactions or from using the store or its resources in connection with adoption events.Assemblymember Todd Gloria, of San Diego, introduced the bill in February 2020. The bill is sponsored by the San Diego Humane Society.RELATED:San Diego area puppy stores accused of selling dogs from puppy millsFake animal rescue group sued for alleged "puppy laundering scheme"San Diego-area pet stores cited for illegal puppy sales"The mass breeding operations of puppy mills are unhealthy and inhumane. We don’t want animals experiencing that cruelty in California," said Assemblymember Todd Gloria. "Bella’s Act will finally fulfill our state’s promise to end the illicit puppy mill industry and encourage pet retailers to partner with rescues and shelters for adoption events. I urge the Governor to sign this bill and ensure we no longer tolerate or facilitate puppy mill cruelty in this state."While California implemented a ban on the sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits in retail stores in 2019, unless the animals were obtained from a shelter or rescue group, some retails utilized a loophole in the law by importing animals from outside the state for sale.Bella's Act was named after a corgi named "Bella" who was illegally bred in a puppy mill, before being sold in a San Diego County pet store where she was advertised as a rescue animal. Bella sold for thousands of dollars. Her owner says the dog was declawed while in the puppy mill and developed severe bronchitis that led to costly medical bills.Bella has since recovered but still suffers from anxiety.San Diego Humane Society President and CEO Dr. Gary Weitzman said, “We are thrilled with the passage of AB 2152, Bella’s Act, to close loopholes in the law that allowed unscrupulous pet store owners to continue to ship puppy mill puppies into our state for sale. Thanks to Assemblymembers Gloria and O’Donnell, California will finally end the retail sales of dogs, cats and rabbits once and for all. We look forward to receiving Governor Newsom’s signature and to the impact this critical legislation will have on the importation and sale of inhumanely bred animals in our state.” 2518

(KGTV) — Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a series of bills on Wednesday aimed at reforming the criminal justice system in California.The series of bills signed by Newsom intends to increase oversight of the criminal justice system, amid nationwide calls for police reform. Newsom and advocates hailed the new laws as first steps in reforming policing in the state.“I hope people recognize we’re moving in the right direction, and again I just recognize we have a lot more work to do in this space and we are not walking away from that responsibility,” Newsom said.The bills signed will enact several reforms including:AB-1196: A ban on arm-based grips, including chokeholds that apply pressure to a person's windpipe, and to carotid holds, which slow the flow of blood to the brain.AB-1506: Requiring the state attorney general to investigate fatal police shootings of unarmed civilians.AB-1185: Allowing county supervisors to create oversight board and inspectors general with subpoena powers over independently elected sheriffs.AB-2542: Suspects could be entitled to new trials or sentences if they can demonstrate racial bias played a role in any part of their case.AB-3070: Allowing judges to assess whether lawyers illegally exclude jurors based on their race.SB-823: Will phase out California's remaining juvenile prisons. The state will instead create an Office of Youth and Community Restoration and send grants to counties to provide custody and supervision.Several other measures that would have sought further reforms did not make it past the closing hours of the legislative session last month, including efforts to release police misconduct records, require officers to intervene if they see excessive force, limits officers' use of rubber bullets and tear gas, and end the careers of officers who commit serious misconduct.The Associated Press contributed to this report. 1886

(KGTV) — For the second time in person and final time before the 2020 election, President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden will meet on the debate stage.Thursday's debate is set to begin at 6 p.m. PST from Nashville, Tenn., with moderator Kristen Welker walking the candidates through topics including fighting COVID-19, American families, race in America, climate change, national security, and leadership.The debate will also feature a format change introducing a "mute button," requiring that a candidates' microphone is turned off when their opponent is delivering his opening remarks for a given topic. The candidates' first meeting on stage was riddled with interruptions before topics reached the open discussion portion.Thursday's debate comes after a flood of headlines out of the nation's capital that may impact the discussion on-stage:Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee sent Judge Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination to the Senate floor — a significant step that could allow the Senate to confirm her nomination as soon as Monday.A day after leaving in the middle of a 60 Minutes interview, the White House scooped CBS and published the full, unedited footage online.Weekly unemployment claims dipped below 800,000 for the first time in months, though those figures remain historically high.During a Fox News interview on Tuesday, Trump called on Attorney General William Barr to open a corruption investigation into Biden based on allegations surrounding a New York Post article about a laptop that may or may not have belonged to his son, Hunter.Thursday was originally set to be the third in-person debate between Trump and Biden, however, individual town halls were held on different networks after the president declined to participate in a virtual debate following his positive COVID-19 diagnosis. 1869

(KGTV) - Did U.S. soccer star Megan Rapinoe stomp on the American Flag following the team's World Cup victory?No.During the postgame celebration, Rapinoe's teammate Allie Long briefly dropped the flag on the ground while Rapinoe was playing to the crowd.While video shows her foot may have inadvertently touched the flag, she certainly didn't stop on it.The U.S. Flag Code says the flag should never touch the ground.But this was clearly not a malicious act. 466