吉林去医院看前列腺挂什么科吉林有性功能障碍怎么办,吉林那家医院包皮手术做的好,吉林治疗阳痿一般要花多少价钱,吉林针灸能治疗阳痿早泄吗?,吉林包皮过长切割费用,吉林哪家医院包皮环切,吉林怎么让阴茎边长

OCEANSIDE, Calif., (KGTV) -- Oceanside City Council decided Wednesday night to postpone a vote regarding a controversial development plan in East Oceanside. The developer hoped to postpone the vote in order to make adjustments to the plan. Residents opposed to the plan hoped Council members cast a 'no' vote to put an end to the plan.The North River Farms Development sits on 177 acres in an area Southwest of Bonsall, known as South Morro Hills. "We're really excited to bring an 'Agrihood' to the City of Oceanside," Ninia Hammond, Project Manager of Integral Communities, said. Her company began crafting this plan five years ago. Their goal is to create a place that will feature a trifecta of community, housing, and farming on traditionally agricultural land.The Oceanside Chamber of Commerce expressed their support of the project in February. They argued that it would bring in millions of dollars, and help the city meets its 2021 Regional Housing Needs Assessment goal.10News met with Jane Marshall, a resident vehemently opposed to the plan."We would rather have a better quality of life, where a developer is willing to work with us in all our infill projects," Marshall said. "We have plenty of room to build instead of taking prime farmland from Oceanside."But the developer said this is the only location for a plan of this kind. "The maker spaces, the creative hub, the exposure to the view of the river," Hammond said. "All of that makes the nature of it, really specific to the location."Marshall disagreed. She said the development would decimate small farms, increase traffic and pollution, and create flooding and fire issues. She said the plan does not include a clear emergency evacuation plan, putting residents at risk. Because of these very issues, Oceanside's Planning Commission turned down the plan for the second time two weeks ago. But Hammond said they are optimistic the city council will postpone the vote and reconsider the issue another time, after they make revisions. "Our goal is to make this the safest and best-planned community we possibly can. Through enhancement like offers, irrigation, setbacks, high fuel mod zones," Hammond said. 2187

NOTICE: We are receiving reports of robocalls telling voters to stay home. Disregard these calls. If you have not already voted, today is the day! Polls in Kansas close at 7:00 p.m. local time. Find your polling location here: https://t.co/PWjjT24hmw #Election2020 #ksleg— KS Sec. of State (@KansasSOS) November 3, 2020 327

One of the largest addiction treatment companies in the country is on the hook for millions of dollars after a jury found it partly liable for the death of a California man.Shaun Reyna killed himself less than a day after checking into a treatment facility in Murrieta.“Shaun Reyna is a good man,” said attorney Jude Basile.In an interview with 10News, Basile said Reyna was losing his eyesight after 20 years working in a factory. He eventually lost his job, and depression led to drinking and self-medication.Reyna and his family decided treatment was the best option.He ended up going to a spot called A Better Tomorrow in Murrieta, which is part of the parent company American Addiction Centers. The location was more than 300 miles from his home in Atwater.Basile said less than a day after Reyna was admitted, "He was found dead due to self-inflicted cuts and bled to death."In February, a jury awarded the family a million verdict against American Addiction Centers and other defendants. The jury found them negligent.Court documents claimed “Decedent should have never of been admitted into ABTTC (A Better Tomorrow Treatment Center) DEFENDANTS program, and instead should have been referred to a facility/program that could provide the level of services he needed. ABTTC DEFENDANTS admitted Decedent Shaun Reyna knowing they could not provide the level of service he needed. They did so out of pure greed, putting profit ahead of patient safety.”According to a news release from the law firm representing the Reyna family, evidence revealed a call center that was staffed by people with little to no experience in addiction screening."When they called the call center they would be met with folks at the intake call center that were being paid on commission, that had quotas, and whose job was simply to sell, not to properly screen, but to sell,” said Reyna family attorney Jeremiah Lowe.In one of the recorded calls between Reyna and a treatment center representative you can hear the desperation in Reyna's voice.“Yeah, I have to do something," Reyna said. “Because I can't -- I feel like I can't hold on any longer.” A representative on the other end told him he understood. “I get it. We're reaching crisis mode, and if -- you need to get into a safe environment.”An addiction specialist who testified as an expert for the Reyna family told 10News the first thing the treatment center should have done was referred Reyna to a higher level of care than they were providing."The complications that can result if it’s not treated properly are seizures, strokes, hallucinations, confusion and things like what happened in this case with depression and suicide and they also required very close observation,” said Dr. Michel Sucher.The head of American Addiction Centers, Michael Cartwright, spoke to Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin by phone. Cartwright said he disagrees with the verdict. He believes Reyna's treatment location was appropriate. A spokesperson for American Addiction Centers directed 10News to a Yahoo Finance article on the technological advancements being implemented in its treatment centers. While Reyna's case is extreme, it's not the first time the company has faced criticism.10News’ sister station in Tampa, Fla., exposed questionable practices with the company's River Oaks Treatment facility. WFTS reported the facility's “former transportation director Mike Isom says staff was often unprepared to deal with mental health issues."  Crisis in CaliforniaAccording to the California Opioid Overdose Surveillance Dashboard, 2,031 people died of an opioid overdose in 2016 in California. Of those deaths, 251 occurred in San Diego County.With the opioid epidemic reaching crisis level, addiction treatment centers are in high demand.However, in California, there's concern the lack of supply to meet that demand has allowed for some to take advantage of people in need.According to information provided by the California Department of Health Care Services, in the 2016-17 fiscal year, there were 540 complaints against addiction treatment centers statewide. That's up from years past.There were also 36 people who died while participating in addiction rehab facilities statewide in 2017-18.Experts tell 10News there are also more people checking in to treatment facilities."When you look at that compared to the 300 plus thousand people who were treated in those facilities you see that is drastically lower than one percent and I will stack up our industry's results with any hospital system in California,” said Stampp Corbin with the Addiction Treatment Advocacy Coalition.Corbin said there are more than 1,700 treatment facilities in California.He told 10News that because there is an opioid crisis, people need access to treatment and the vast majority of facilities are helping people and saving lives.Corbin said, just as you would check your doctor's qualifications, potential patients should ask for the information about who will be providing their treatment. He suggests asking what the treatment process is and for people to check with the California Department of Health Care Services, which tracks any adverse incident."I don't think people should be worried about treatment centers any more than they are worried about hospital systems,” Corbin said.Reyna’s attorney believes the treatment center industry is needed, but needs better enforcement."We have good regulations that if they are enforced would clean up a lot of the industry,” Lowe said. ‘The problem is right now those regulations aren't being effectively enforced." 5797

Opioids are a big problem around the country, which has led to legislators looking for new ways to fund rehabilitation.New York has enacted the Opioid Stewardship Act, a bill to tax opioids. It would collect 0 million a year for six years.The opioid industry calls the law a "punitive surcharge" on distributors and manufacturers, and lawsuits they've filed call it unconstitutional.Opponents also say the act will ultimately hurt consumers, because generic opioids have such low profit margins, so critics fear they will be forced out of the market.California, Idaho and Tennessee have all tried and failed to pass similar laws. Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New Jersey are waiting to see what happens in New York before they move forward with their own legislation. 780

OMAHA, Neb. - While some phones are providing users with the ability to automatically detect — and disable phone use — when you're driving, there are also apps out there that can help keep drivers — particularly younger drivers steer clear of the temptation to allow distractions while driving.  308