太原大便出血 肚子疼-【山西肛泰院】,HaKvMMCN,山西正常大便有血怎么办,太原肛门痒怎么办,山西粘液血便,太原痔疮是怎样的,太原市快速治疗痔疮,太原痔疮是什么样的图片
太原大便出血 肚子疼太原肛门周围痒是怎么治疗,太原便出血是怎么回事,山西早期痔疮的治疗方法,山西痔疮一个肉疙瘩,太原长期大便不成形的原因,太原省人民医院做个普通胃镜多少钱,山西痔疮手术预约
RICHMOND, Va -- Governor Ralph Northam is expected to announce on Tuesday an executive order requiring Virginians to wear face coverings in public spaces where social distancing cannot be guaranteed at all times.Since asking Virginians to do their “homework” and obtain facial protection, officials with the Governors office continue to hint an order is coming.A source with knowledge of the order said it is expected to only apply when going inside Virginia businesses. The CDC and Virginia health officials have recommended wearing face cloth face coverings for many weeks, citing research that shows coronavirus is easily spread person to person by droplets expelled when someone speaks or coughs. Individuals who contracted COVID-19 but do not display symptoms are of particular concern to health officials, as businesses slowly begin to reopen their doors to the public."I think it's fair to say that people have gotten very creative with their facial protections," Northam said Friday. "Be ready on Tuesday to go out and about in your business when it's essential with facial protection,"The pending order comes several days after Northam faced pointed criticism for not wearing a mask during a visit to the Virginia Beach oceanfront Saturday. The Governor was photographed taking selfies and visiting with beachgoers without visible facial protection.“The Governor has repeatedly encouraged wearing face coverings inside or when social distancing is impossible. He was outside yesterday and not expecting to be within six feet of anyone,” a spokesperson said, adding that the Governor should have brought a mask with him during the visit.Final details of the facial covering order are still pending, so who will enforce it and how remains unclear. To this point, individuals have been responsible for obtaining and wearing a face mask in public spaces, and state agencies have distributed thousands of masks in low-income neighborhood around Richmond and elsewhere.Monday morning near St. John’s Church in Richmond, where Patrick Henry delivered his, "give me liberty or give me death” speech, protestors from the “Reopen Virginia Coalition” held another rolling rally in honor of Memorial Day and in opposition to what they call “government overreach.”“It’s not governments job to tell us what we have to do,” said David Britt, one of the group’s organizers. Britt said he keeps an American flag print bandana in his car and wears it when thinks others might feel uncomfortable. Still, he said a facial covering order is too little too late.“It’s shutting the barn door after the entire herd as already escaped,” Britt said. “When the Governor goes to Virginia Beach on Saturday, and hobs-nobs with folks, and in no way is social distancing, and is not wearing a mask, how am I supposed to take him seriously when he says I need to wear a mask?”On a sunny afternoon in Carytown, spotting people with a mask on or in-tow didn’t take long. Katie Wall and Matthew Richardson, who live in the Museum District, said they took mask guidelines seriously from the very beginning and support Northam’s pending order.“Indoors especially because that’s how it’s being transmitted from all the information I see,” Richardson said.“I would say at the grocery store or pharmacy like 90 percent of people are already doing it, so hopefully the other ten percent will get on board,” Wall said. “I would say it’s not about protecting you, but it’s about protecting other people specifically. Maybe high risk family members that you could transmit it to them and you wouldn’t even know that you did that.”In the long run, the effectiveness of a statewide mask order likely comes down to an individual’s willingness to wear them in public, no matter what enforcement mechanisms look like.“I don’t believe it makes a lick of difference, but I’m not going to plant a flag in the ground and say, ‘I will not wear a mask!’” said Britt with Reopen Virginia. “That’s just silly reactionary stuff, and that’s not what we’re about.”“I think it’s all different definitions of what freedom is because none of this is really freedom,” Wall said of coronavirus restrictions. “I want to be free of, in my opinion, other people’s poor decision making as well.”This article was written by Jake Burns for 4290
Some of the 33 parents charged Tuesday with cheating to get their children into prestigious schools may have paid enough in bribes to cover the full cost of a college education and then some.Two SAT/ACT administrators, an exam proctor, nine coaches at elite schools, a college administrator and 33 parents -- a total of 50 people -- are accused of participating in a scheme that involved cheating on standardized tests and bribing college coaches and others to admit students as athletes regardless of their abilities, prosecutors revealed in a federal indictment. The scandal is being called the largest college admissions scam ever prosecuted.FBI Special Agent Joseph Bonavolonta said some parents spent anywhere from 0,000 to .5 million to guarantee admissions for their children.The relatives of one applicant paid a California business owner .2 million to falsely describe the individual as the co-captain of a well-known soccer California soccer team, although the applicant did not play competitive soccer, prosecutors said.The average annual cost of tuition and fees at a private, four-year college is ,478, according to the most recent report from the US Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics."This case is about the widening corruption of elite college admissions through the steady application of wealth combined with fraud," Andrew Lelling, the US attorney for Massachusetts, said. "There can be no separate college admission system for the wealthy, and I'll add that there will not be a separate criminal justice system either."The parents alleged to have been involved include CEOs, a fashion designer, the chairman of a global law firm and actors including Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin, Lelling said.He added, "For every student admitted through fraud, an honest, genuinely talented student was rejected."How the money was spentMuch of the indictment revolves around William Rick Singer, the founder of a for-profit college counseling and preparation business known as The Key."OK, so, who we are ... what we do is we help the wealthiest families in the US get their kids into school," Singer told one parent, according to prosecutors.Lelling explained the two main avenues for carrying out the scheme."I'll speak more broadly, there were essentially two kinds of fraud that Singer was selling," Lelling said of the accusations that span from 2011 to 2019. "One was to cheat on the SAT or ACT, and the other was to use his connections with Division I coaches and use bribes to get these parents' kids into school with fake athletic credentials."For example, prosecutors said Singer and his co-conspirators used stock photos of a person playing a sport and then put the face of a student onto that image via Photoshop.Singer was paid roughly million by parents to help their children get in to schools, the US attorney said.Singer pleaded guilty on Tuesday to racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of justice, prosecutors said.Actresses are allegedly on tape discussing schemeBest known for her role on TV's "Desperate Housewives," Huffman is accused of paying ,000 to Singer's fake charity, the Key Worldwide Foundation, to facilitate cheating for her daughter on the SATs, the complaint says.Her daughter received a 1420 on her test, which was 400 points higher than a PSAT taken a year earlier without the same administrator, the complaint states.Huffman also discussed the scheme in a recorded phone call with a cooperating witness, the complaint says.Huffman has been charged with felony conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud, according to court paperwork filed Monday in federal court in Massachusetts. She was arrested without incident at her home, the FBI said.She appeared Tuesday in a federal court in Los Angeles where a judge set bond for her at 0,000 and federal agents took her passport.Her next court date has been set for March 29 in Boston.Loughlin, who played Aunt Becky on "Full House," is facing the same felony charge. Her husband, fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli, was also charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.Giannulli and Loughlin allegedly agreed to pay bribes totaling 0,000 in exchange for having their two daughters designated as recruits to the USC crew team, even though they did not participate in crew, the complaint said.The money was given to Singer's fake charity, and in a recorded phone call Singer clarified that the money was actually for getting their daughters into USC crew, according to the complaint.Giannulli appeared in court Tuesday, where a magistrate judge set a million bond and ordered him to surrender his passport.Even though she was not present in court, prosecutors and Loughlin's attorneys agreed on similar terms as well as permission for her to travel to Vancouver and back for work.CNN has contacted Iconix Brand Group, which owns Giannulli's namesake fashion company, Mossimo.CNN is also working to get comment from the actresses' representatives.The colleges involvedCoaches from Yale, Stanford, the University of Southern California, Wake Forest and Georgetown, among others, are implicated in the case. The extensive case involved arrests in six states across the country."The Department of Justice believes that Yale has been the victim of a crime perpetrated by a former coach who no longer works at the university," the university said in a statement sent out to the school. "The corrupt behavior alleged by the Department of Justice is an affront to our university's deeply held values of inclusion and fairness."Georgetown told students that the coach arrested in their case, "has not coached our tennis team since December 2017, when he was placed on leave after the Office of Undergraduate Admissions identified irregularities in his recruitment practices and the University initiated an internal investigation."The University of Southern California said it is reviewing its application process.What happens to the students?It was not an accident that no students were charged on Tuesday, said Lelling, the US attorney. The parents and other defendants were "the prime movers of this fraud," he said. He said students may face charges down the road. 6345
Sundae Bloody Sundae?? Talk about digging a hole for yourselves McDonalds pic.twitter.com/nIx4lPF7x5— Davey wan Kenobi (@kenobifan1977) October 31, 2019 164
Shortly after the body of 52-year-old Vanita Gray was found in her SUV on Houston Whittier at Hayes on Detroit's east side, her boyfriend drove up to a Detroit police scout car and told officers that someone killed his girlfriend. A source said that Gray's 52-year-old boyfriend, who was armed with a gun, also told police that he shot the person who killed her, but the source says the boyfriend didn't have details to support his claim.The only thing police knew for sure was that Gray was dead from multiple gunshot wounds after someone opened fire on her in her SUV. Someone called 911 around 1:30 a.m. Tuesday to report a vehicle on the side of the road with bullet holes in the windshield.Twenty-one shell casings were found in the area with some of the bullets hitting the glass window of a nearby furniture store. And it didn't take long for police to go from calling Gray's boyfriend a person of interest to the suspect in her murder. Gray and her boyfriend were living together in a home, less than a mile from where she was killed. She was wearing flip flops and lounge clothes. Gray was reportedly employed in a rehab center. Her boyfriend was on disability, according to his relatives. Right now, Gray's boyfriend, who is on probation for retail fraud, has not been charged with her murder. This article was written by by Kimberly Craig for 1366
TAMPA, Fla. — An alarming new study found certain engines in Kia and Hyundai vehicles are more likely to catch fire than any other vehicles on the road, according to a report by Scripps affiliate WFTS-TV in Tampa.Matt Moore, who oversaw the engine study at the Highway Loss Data Institute, reported Kia and Hyundai vehicles with two-liter, turbocharged engines were more than three times more likely to catch fire than engines in any other similar-sized vehicle on U.S. roads.“These things tend to be very catastrophic,” Moore told I-Team Investigator Jackie Callaway. “An increase of three and half a times the control population is a serious problem.”Those engines are found in 2011 to 2015 Kia Optima, 2011 to 2014 Hyundai Sonatas and 2013 to 2014 Hyundai Santa Fe Sports.The automakers have recalled most of those vehicles since January. Hyundai points out that it started recalling vehicles back in 2015 and again in 2017. The automakers have yet to recall all vehicles running on another potentially hazardous engine – a 2.4-liter model that the institute found is nearly two times more likely to catch fire. The automaker does say however that they have recalled many models that contained the 2.4 liter engine.That was the same engine in Kirstin Wilson’s 2016 Kia Sportage when it burst into flames as she drove down a Georgia highway last summer.“It literally blew up in front of us with all of our stuff in it,” said Wilson.But Wilson’s SUV is not among the hundreds of thousands of models Kia recently recalled for fire hazards.A Kia spokesman said the automaker negotiated a resolution with Wilson because she only owned the vehicle for one month before the incident.Fernanda Krueger’s 2016 Kia Sorento is also not on the recall list – even though her SUV with a 2.4-liter engine burned up last April in San Diego.“I was driving with my car on fire,” said Krueger.Kia and Hyundai have recalled nearly 700,000 vehicles since January, but the Center for Auto Safety told the I-Team that’s still not enough. Last year, Jason Levine of the the Center for Auto Safety petitioned federal regulators to force the automakers to recall 2.9 million vehicles.“There are probably several million vehicles between the two manufactures Kia and Hyundai that remain not at a recall status that remain potentially a fire risk,” said Levine.Insurance claim records show more Kia and Hyundai vehicles are catching fire than have been reported to government regulators.Those records show more than 2,700 fires in just five models alone – 2011 to 15 Kia Optima, 2011 to 14 Hyundai Sonata, 2011 to 15 Kia Sorento, 2011 to 12 Hyundai Santa Fe and 2013 to 14 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport.The automakers wouldn’t answer questions directly about whether they would expand the recall, but said safety is a top priority.Statement from Kia Motors America:Kia Motors America (KMA) recognizes that customer safety is paramount and is committed to addressing every thermal incident. KMA continuously evaluates all Kia models as part of its standard vehicle monitoring activities. If a safety defect is detected through the course of vehicle monitoring, Kia promptly reports a safety related defect to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) within the five days mandated by 49 CFR 573. Depending upon the underlying cause of a recall, not all vehicles of any one model and model year may be included due to varying configurations and equipment. The SC147 recall pertains only to those vehicles equipped with GDI engines within the applicable models.Claims involving damage to a Kia vehicle, including fires, are reviewed on a case-by-case basis and if a fire is determined to be the result of a Kia manufacturing issue, KMA will work with the customer to reach a satisfactory resolution to the matter. If a recall is unable to be remedied immediately, KMA will provide alternate transportation at no cost to the customer until their vehicle is repaired or another satisfactory resolution is determined. KMA always encourages customers to remedy any open recalls as quickly as possible by taking their vehicle to the nearest Kia dealership. Additional information about open recalls may be found by visiting 4212