太原肛门息肉肚子跳动山西什么治肛裂,太原治疗肛裂的方法,太原痔疮怎么治疗啊,山西著名的肛肠医院,太原肛漏是什么症状,山西治痔疮用什么方法好,山西得了痔疮疼痛怎么办

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Looking for a summer job? The City of San Diego is hoping to fill 46 positions at city pools. According to the city, all 46 lifeguard and pool management positions are available at 13 different facilities. Anyone interested has to attend an initial tryout to assess basic swimming skills and qualify to enroll in the city’s lifeguard training program. RELATED: State offers money to help boost college savings accounts Tryouts are being held Tuesday, March 19 and Thursday, March 21, 2019, at the Tierrasanta Pool from 5 – 7 p.m. and Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at Vista Terrace Pool in San Ysidro from 9 – 10 a.m.Those who pass will need to attend a week-long lifeguard training program. The course teaches safety, first aid and lifesaving procedures. The program costs 1 and scholarships are available, the city says. Participants who graduate the program will receive American Red Cross Lifeguard Training and Title 22 First Air certifications and will qualify to work as a lifeguard at city pools. RELATED: Dual enrollment helping students cut tuition costs“With summer fast approaching, it is important City pool facilities are fully staffed to ensure the public has access to safe swimming and recreational opportunities,” said Don Crockett, District Manager for the City of San Diego Aquatics Division. “Filling these lifeguard and pool manager positions will also allow the City to offer more swimming programs for children and adults including water aerobics, infant swimming and drowning prevention classes.”Anyone interested in participating in the tryouts will need to sign up first. For more information on the program, click here. 1672

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Lupus patients were shocked and scared when they found out they couldn't get a refill of their life-altering prescription, due to COVID-19.Grandmother Michele Fumar said her daughter has had lupus, an autoimmune disease, since she was 11. She's 27 now, married with two young kids.Her daughter got an email from Kaiser Permanente reading in part, "in order to keep an essential supply of hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil) for critically ill COVID-19 patients, we have placed a temporary freeze on refills."She was just shocked, we were all shocked," Fumar said about reading that email. "This drug is very important to maintain her health so yes it is just very frustrating."The kind of lupus her daughter has attacks her kidneys. Even while taking her prescription she's had complications. Fumar said her daughter became ill at the mall several years back, suddenly weak with a headache. That trip to the emergency room turned into a week long hospital stay.Fumar said her daughter has been trying to wean off of the medication with no luck thus far. "She only has 16 days left of her prescription." Now they're both scared. Her daughter was told to space out the medication, but they don't know how that will affect her health.Janae Lessnau was just diagnosed with lupus in January. On average it takes six years to get diagnosed with lupus, meeting several criteria from several specialists, the Lupus Foundation says.Lessnau said the drug has already had a huge impact on her life, "it helps with fatigue, it helps with the joint pain. It's not really affecting my kidneys or any vital organs right now but not being on it, it could increase the spread, you know increase the process."Lessnau said she felt lucky to pick up her monthly prescription Tuesday at CVS. She heard at the pharmacy she won't be able to get a refill in the future.In contrast, CVS put out a statement reading in part, "With client consent, CVS Caremark is setting appropriate limits on the quantity of each of these medicines for potential use in treating COVID-19. Members who already take these medicines for approved uses will be able to bypass the new quantity limits.""We all feel bad for the patients who may be suffering from COVID-19 but it's not a proven solution," Fumar said. Lessnau agreed adding, "when did we get to the point where we pick and choose lives?"The Lupus Foundation is contacting politicians in Sacramento for help, hoping to find a solution."Right now, today we can't say yes there is a shortage, I don't believe that's true. But what I am afraid of is it will be very quick, because if people are hoarding the drug it will turn out to be like the toilet paper," Executive Director of the Lupus Foundation Southern California Division Elizabeth Savage said.After reaching out to Kaiser Permanente they said they are re-evaluating their policy. 2874

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- In three weeks San Diego County will elect its next district attorney,  and in a recent poll a large number of voters indicated that they're still undecided. The results of our scientific 10News Union-Tribune poll shows the battle between Summer Stephan and challenger Genevieve Jones-Wright is wide open. If the election were held today, Summer Stephan would get 35 percent of the vote. Genevieve Jones-Wright would get 22 percent and 43 percent of those polled said they are undecided. "Those polls are consistent with what our campaign research shows," Jones-Wright told 10News. "We knew we were up against a political machine and it really is no surprise to me that she's up on the polls."Progressive candidate Jones-Wright says Stephan got a head start, by being appointed to the district attorney job when Bonnie Dumanis left. Jones-Wright said she thinks the poll shows her campaign is gaining steam.Stephan was encouraged by the poll numbers. "This is very encouraging, what you're telling me, because it shows that what we're doing is working," she told 10News. "That San Diegans are enjoying that we're one of the safest urban regions in the country and that they really prefer experience over an experiment."The poll shows that Stephan's voter base is republican, white and over the age of 35. It shows that Wright's voter base is younger, more racially mixed and primarily democratic. On Monday, Summer Stephan pulled out of a community forum, one which both she and Genevieve Jones-Wright accepted to face off. 1581

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Independent reviews by the FDA show the COVID-19 vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna have similar levels of safety and efficacy, although there are early indications of potential differences.Both vaccines rely on the same basic approach: jumpstarting the immune system with messenger RNA. The FDA confirmed their overall efficacy is essentially identical; 95 percent for Pfizer and 94.1 percent for Moderna.However, signals in the data suggest Moderna’s vaccine may better protect against severe cases of COVID-19, while Pfizer’s vaccine may work better in adults over 65. But experts warned those differences may just be statistical illusions.In Moderna’s study of 30,000 volunteers, 30 people got severe cases of COVID-19. All 30 of those cases were in the placebo group, suggesting the vaccine offers powerful protection against the most serious symptoms.In Pfizer’s trial of 44,000 volunteers, one vaccinated person got a severe case compared to 10 people in the placebo group.“We still need more data,” said Dr. Abisola Olulade of Sharp Rees-Stealy. “It's not a reason to recommend one versus the other.”In adults over 65, the efficacy of Moderna’s vaccine dipped slightly to 86.4 percent. Pfizer’s vaccine was 92.9 percent effective in people aged 65 to 74 and 100 percent effective in individuals 75 and up.“When I think people in the community look at that number, they might say, ‘Oh, that Moderna vaccine probably isn't as good for the older population compared to the Pfizer vaccine.’ But as a clinician looking at numbers, they're both amazing,” said UC San Francisco infectious disease expert Dr. Peter Chin-Hong.FDA scientists found both vaccines are safe but short-term side effects are common, especially with Moderna’s drug. Both vaccines are administered in two doses. The table below lists the percentage of vaccinated volunteers who reported a side effect after either dose, although side effects were most common after the second injection.Side effect Moderna PfizerFatigue 68.5% 62.9%Headache 63.0% 55.1%Muscle pain59.6%38.3%Joint pain44.8%23.6%Chills43.4%31.9%Fever14.8%14.2%Typically the symptoms went away in one day.“Just because a vaccine has side effects doesn’t mean it’s not safe,” said Dr. Olulade. “We know that side effects happen actually because your immune system is working and waking up. It's actually a positive thing.”The slight difference in side effects could be because of differences in the way researchers polled volunteers, or it could be something with the architecture of the vaccines, experts said.The companies use different tiny bubbles of fat to enclose the messenger RNA. Moderna’s bubble is a little stronger and more stable so it doesn’t need to be stored at sub-arctic temperatures.“It could be that [Moderna’s] elicits a little more inflammation than the other,” Dr. Chin-Hong said.Having slightly more side effects could be a sign that Moderna’s vaccine prompts a stronger immune response that might lead to longer-lasting immunity, but the durability of either vaccine remains one of the most pressing unanswered questions.The biggest difference may be where the vaccines are deployed. Since Pfizer's vaccine needs to be stored at such cold temperatures, experts said Moderna's vaccine may be prioritized for rural hospitals and community health centers that lack ultra-cold storage units. 3370

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - In the wake of the coronavirus budget crisis, cuts are being proposed to child welfare services.The proposed cuts come just weeks after Gov. Gavin Newsom announced new investments totaling million to protect younger Californians at heightened risk for abuse and mistreatment due to COVID-19.The April announcement directed funding to support families struggling to stay together, additional social worker outreach, family resources centers, and age extension for foster youth, among other things.According to the County of San Diego, "The funds approved by Governor Newsom will be used in part, as earmarked, benefiting Child Welfare families receiving emergency response and family maintenance services. The County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency, Child Welfare Services is partnering with the state as it seeks to provide 0 monthly payments to families with children who are at risk of entering foster care. In addition, funds were allocated to help youth who have exited out of the Child Welfare System. The funds will allow foster youth who turn 21 to extend their stay in foster care to prevent potential homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic. San Diego is receiving 0,000 in Transitional Housing Program funds from SB80 which will be used to reduce youth homelessness through the expansion of transitional housing so that we can support youth exiting foster care even after the funds provided for COVID response are no longer available. Funds are also allocated for youth to get access to cell phones and laptops through the iFoster program to continue to participate in educational activities and stay connected with their families during COVID-19. iFoster and San Diego County Child Welfare Services have been working together since 2013 to provide resources to children, youth and caregivers. CWS began working with iFoster to provide cell phones to foster youth in 2019 and will continue this partnership. "But that money will only last so long. The governor's May budget revise contains cuts to children's programs.The budget states: "Child Welfare Services include family support and maltreatment prevention services, child protective services, foster care services, and permanency programs. California's child welfare system provides a continuum of services for children who are either at risk of or have suffered, abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Program success is measured in terms of improving the safety, permanence, and well-being of children and families. The May Revision includes 6.1 million General Fund on 2020-21 for these programs, a decrease of .5 million General Fund since the Governor's Budget. When federal, state, 1991 Realignment, and 2011 Realignment funds are included, total funding for children's programs is over .7 billion in 2020-21."The proposal eliminates Foster Family Agency social worker rate increases, eliminates the Family Urgent Response System, and eliminates the Public Health Nurse Early Intervention Program in Los Angeles County."This is a time where we need to see, not cuts, but increased investment in the kinds of supports that help families meet basic needs and avoid some of the financial stresses and then receive the kinds of services and support for dealing with any issues that may trigger some abuse," said Jessica Heldman with the Children's Advocacy Institute at the University of San Diego.Heldman said they're concerned about funding to help prevent abuse and neglect, funding to foster care services, and making sure there's money to support young adults who are transitioning out of the system and have no support beyond the system.She said transitional youth leave the system at 18 or 21 and don't have a parent or legal guardian who can help with financial support or emotional support. Something as simple as a place to stay."They are high risk of some pretty poor outcomes, and it's going to take a real investment to make sure that we put them in the best position possible when they are going to be struggling," Heldman said.Heldman explained many of the youth aging out of Foster Care are losing their jobs. She cited a recent survey of about 600 transition-age foster youth across the country. It showed 65 percent of the respondents had lost their job, one in five said they are concerned about not having enough money to eat, and more than half of them had not received stimulus checks."I think people are unaware of this population of young adults and older teens who really need the support and need to be a priority or else they are going to become the parents of the next generation who are struggling economically, and the cost to that in our society is going to be far greater than the investment now to make sure that they stay on their feet," she said.Experts say a budget proposal from the Legislature released last week restores many of the cuts proposed by the governor.According to the floor report of the 2020-21 budget, “The Legislature Rejects the Governor's May Revision proposal to eliminate the Foster Family Agency social worker rate increases in 2020-21, Rejects the Governor's May Revision proposal to eliminate the Family Urgent Response System and Rejects the Governor's May Revision proposal to eliminate the Public Health Nurse Early Intervention Program in Los Angeles County among other things.”The overview of the floor report states, "The Speaker of the Assembly, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the Assembly and Senate Budget Committee Chairs announced a legislative agreement on the 2020-21 state budget on June 3, 2020. This sets the stage for legislative negotiations on the budget with the Governor and his administration. The Legislature will meet the June 15 deadline to pass a balanced budget bill.""It is the responsibility of the state to ensure that children who depend on child welfare and foster care youth programs can do so confidently and without fear of abandonment, especially during these uncertain times. I have been a longtime advocate for youth, and I strongly believe that the state funding provided to these programs cannot be compromised. As budget negotiations continue, I urge the Governor's office not to balance the budget on the backs of children who need our help," Assemblymember Brian Maienschein told 10News.County of San Diego Health and Human Services representatives said the agency is monitoring the budget process, what is submitted and what the governor will sign. 6490