太原痔疮割了多长时间好太原市肛肠医院的地址,太原肛门有血是怎么回事,山西痔疮前期症状,太原痔疮好的治疗方法,太原痔疮医治,山西痔疮手术那种好,山西大便鲜血

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Democrats' 5-4 majority on the technically nonpartisan San Diego City Council will increase to 6-3, a majority immune to Mayor Kevin Faulconer's veto.Democrat physician Jennifer Campbell defeated Republican incumbent District 2 City Councilwoman Lorie Zapf, winning 56 percent to 44 percent.  The subtraction of one Republican could have a major impact in terms of the balance of power. Campbell believes it could have a constructive impact.RELATED: How San Diego County — unofficially — during the 2018?midterms "We'll all become collegial.  I think the other side will be more willing to work with us and listen to our points of view, and we'll listen to theirs. We'll be able to work together and get consensus," said Campbell.Political expert John Dadian says a different result is possible. He draws parallels to the Democrats taking control of the U.S. House of Representatives, in terms of the situation."Congress is going to stymie President Trump for then next two years. I think the Democrats are going to stymie anything Mayor Falcouner wants to do," said Dadian.RELATED: Democrats eye path to San Diego City Council supermajorityMayoral vetoes are fairly rare, but there was one in 2014 over a minimum wage hike and, most recently, a veto was used over funding for a special election for the SoccerCity plan.Experts tell 10News some upcoming issues could be shaped by the new supermajority include budget issues like worker wages and benefits, and land use issues like the future of the San Diego Convention Center.  Another example of an impact? Sources tell 10News groups against the recent ban on polystyrene foam were hoping to appeal for a mayoral veto if the Democrats had not secured a supermajority.The Mayor's office released the following statement regarding the new power balance: 1870

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — From the street, Point Loma's Blonde Voyage Salon looks like yet another establishment lost to the coronavirus economy. Its windows are completely covered by brown paper, and the door is shut.But on the other side of those coverings, it's very much business as usual."I have the right to at least fight for my business," said owner Meagan Crowell.Crowell said she could not stomach another closure. She said she only got a ,000 federal Paycheck Protection Program loan, and no other stimulus benefits to help get through."I have two kids," she said. "They are two and four years old and I'm not going to sit back and allow them not to eat."Crowell says she takes the virus very seriously - and that she dipped into her savings to make her salon COVID safe and keep the lights on. But those efforts are still not enough for the governor's new shutdown order, which says salons must close as ICU capacity continues to decrease.And other than two clients rescheduling, Crowell says she's completely booked."I want you to always love the person you see in the mirror, and I think mental health is a huge, huge issue," she said.Meanwhile, the county has served nearly 30 restaurants, bars, gyms and religious organizations with cease and desist orders since the shutdown took effect Monday. Crowell's salon is not one of them.Also on Friday, Bernardo Winery announced it would defy the order and reopen for socially distant on-site dining this weekend, saying in a statement it is basing the decision on its employees, who have suffered amid the shutdown.Under the order, restaurants are limited to takeout only, while bars, wineries and salons must close.Gyms and religious organizations can operator outdoors.Retail can stay open at 20 percent capacity. 1779

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Design plans were approved Wednesday for the permanent structure that will replace a newly constructed temporary homeless shelter in downtown San Diego.Designs for the downtown affordable housing project at Father Joe's Village campus were approved Wednesday by the Civic San Diego planning group. Construction on the project is expected to break ground in early 2019, with residents moving in in 2021.RELATED: San Diego City Council approves funding plan for temporary homeless tentsThe housing site at 14th and Commercial Streets will introduce 400 units to the site. Two-hundred seventy units are reserved for chronically homeless individuals, while the remaining units will go to formerly homeless veterans, families, and other individuals."We know that creating more housing that people can afford is the key to addressing our region’s homelessness crisis in the long term," Deacon Jim Vargas, Father Joe’s Villages president and CEO, said in a release. "With today’s vote, we take one step closer to helping more people off our streets for good."RELATED: How you can help those in need this holiday seasonFather Joe's will now finalize architectural plans with local firm Joseph Wong Design Associates.The project is part of Father Joe's larger plan to bring 2,000 affordable housing units to the area, including transforming motels into apartments.RELATED: Father Joe's Villages propose plan to turn motel units into housing for homeless"Once you have an affordable place to live, it’s infinitely easier to get back on your feet and stay healthy," Vargas said. "This project will connect hundreds of people with the resources they need to succeed, and it can’t come soon enough."The design approval comes one day after San Diego City Council leaders voted to approve a .5 million plan to fund three temporary bridge shelters for the city's homeless population - located in the East Village, Barrio Logan, and the Midway District.RELATED: San Diego program to provide safe parking for homeless living in vehiclesThe three shelters will provide meals, bathroom and shower facilities, beds, job search assistance, and alcohol and drug treatment and counseling. 2248

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — From the confrontation in a Los Angeles Trader Joe's to a showdown in a San Diego Starbucks, there have been a lot of customers claiming businesses can't legally require them to wear a mask.Some customers even carry a card threatening fines and citing the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA. But there are three things to consider before making an ADA claim, according to lawyers.First, to bring a successful ADA lawsuit, attorneys say the person without a mask must truly have a disability. Businesses can ask if a person has a disability, but not much beyond that.RELATED: Confrontation over wearing a mask at Coronado coffee shop"You can't delve into someone's medical condition and ask them a bunch of questions," said attorney Colin Harrison. "I would not advise businesses to ask for any type of documentation."If the person says they have a disability, the ADA requires businesses to make reasonable accommodation. So what's reasonable?"A reasonable accommodation might be to ask the person to wear a face shield, which is about an inch and away and probably wouldn't restrict their ability to breathe," says attorney Steven Elia.RELATED: GoFundMe started for San Diego barista after woman posts about not wearing mask at StarbucksElia says other accommodations might include curbside pickup, but the ADA has limits: businesses don't have to fundamentally alter the way they operate."Customer says I don't want to wear a mask, I want you to deliver to my home. If the business doesn't already provide delivery service, that would be a major fundamental alteration of their business, one they would not be required to do," Harrison said.Both attorneys suggested businesses try to make accommodations first.RELATED: Feds warn of phony cards claiming face mask exemptionBut what happens if those accommodations won't work? There's a third component in the ADA: Subsection 36.208 allows businesses to turn disabled people away if they pose a direct threat to the health and safety of others."Someone not wearing a mask, they might think they're not infected, but they could be and pose a direct threat to spread the virus to many people," Elia said.The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has said COVID-19 does constitute a direct threat, so our experts say the threat of a successful lawsuit in a case like this is low.That said, there's nothing stopping people from filing these lawsuits. There have been at least nine across the country. But businesses that win can pursue legal fees from the other party. 2548

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Due to the pandemic, high school sports are officially on hold until January at the earliest. But while frustration is setting in, CIF is doing everything it can to get the kids back on the field. There's nothing like high school football and the sights and sounds of Friday Night Lights, or a slam dunk on the basketball court. Unfortunately, because of COVID-19, it's wait-and-see for every high school athlete."I think it's very disappointing. Are kids, are families, are schools and communities have been waiting quite a long time and it's been tough," says San Diego Section CIF Commissioner Joe Heinz.There was hope of a December start, but as COVID-19 surged, it was negated by the California Department of Public Health. "It's definitely a fine balance across the nation as different things are happening," Heinz said. "I know our executive director is talking on a regular basis with the California Department of Health and with the governor's office."So for the time being, players, coaches, schools, and everybody else associated with high school athletics must be patient. It has everyone frustrated."You can't blame them. I think we are all frustrated. It's been a long time coming, and when you see other things going on in other states, which has been successful," said Heinz.Now, if the OK is given next month, Heinz says they will have a plan in place. However, there is no guarantee all sports can be played. "Obviously we could get to some point where we just don't have enough time to get a season in. There is no way to compact all of our sports into one season. We're just waiting for that opportunity to put a plan in place. We are just waiting for the word from the state," Heinz said. 1737