云南山西肛肠医院太原拉大便啦出血是怎么回事,太原好的 肛肠医院,太原混合痔疮用什么,治痔疮山西到,太原肛瘘手术并发症,山西肛瘘谢肛泰,太原那个医院看痔疮好

ST. LOUIS, Mo. – Mesmerized by living history five shows a day, five days a week, one man steps into a cinema hall to keep a century old tradition alive. Inside theater three of the Chase Park Plaza Cinema in St. Louis, Gerry Marian represents a throwback to the movie houses of yester-year. “It is my passion. I love it. I really love it,” said Marian. At 70 years old, he is among the last working cinema organists in the country. When asked what it’s like to sit down at the classic organ, Marian says he’s transported far away. “I’m like in a different world,” he said. For the last 20 years, Marian has played an electronic orchestral instrument for audiences between movie showings, a preamble to the latest Hollywood picture. “This past October, we did ‘Phantom of The Opera’ and we had 130 people here on Saturday and 110 people here on a Sunday,” explained Marian. The theater organ also known as a “unit orchestra” can mimic a host of sounds from flutes and oboes, to strings and percussion. “It's an orchestra in one,” said Marian. From the early days of the nickelodeon until the dawn of talkies, theater organs were a fixture in nearly all grand cinema palaces. They were originally designed to allow musicians like Marian to have all the instruments at their fingertips. “These theater organs basically were intended to do the silent movie, to complement the silent movie,” said Marian. Marian committed his life to the art after seeing legendary theater organist Stan Kann play at St. Louis’ famous Fox Theater in 1961. “My dad took me up there and I told him right then and there that this is what I want. This is my vocation,” he says. More than 50 years later, Marian says he has no plans to stop playing just yet.“I don't know. But I love doing it. It's my life. It's my love.” 1813

WASHINGTON, D.C. – When the impeachment inquiry kicked off nearly two weeks ago, truth became part of a political tug of war. “Lots of bombshells,” said Louis Michael Seidman, a Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown Law. He has been studying the impeachment process since the Nixon years and said, whether or not a crime was committed, is not necessarily the point when it comes to impeachment. “The standard is not the criminal law,” Seidman said. “The standard is whether he is abusing the powers of his office and doing the job that he's supposed to do to make sure the laws are faithfully executed.” Most House Republicans have backed Trump and don’t appear to be budging. "The American people sent us to Washington to solve problems, not to wage scorched earth political warfare against the other party," said Rep. Devin Nunes, R-California. So now what? Based on all the testimony, the House Intelligence Committee will send any materials it collected and a report to the Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee may hold its own public hearings or depositions. Those members will then decide if impeachment goes to the full House for a vote. Impeachment requires 218 members to vote for it – there are 233 Democrats in the House. If it passes, it moves to the Senate, where a trial is held, with Senators acting as the jury. There are 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents in that chamber – removal from office requires a two-thirds vote there. Despite those numbers, Professor Seidman cautions against trying to predict an outcome. “It's just a fool's errand to predict with any certainty how this will end,” he said. It’s an end that will decide whether or not a sitting president is removed from office. 1755

School lockdown. It's a term that has become far too common in America. An analysis by the Washington Post found more than 4.1 million students were involved in at least one lockdown in the 2017-2018 school year. One million of those students were in elementary school. Just this month, a lockdown at Sandy Hook Elementary occurred on sixth anniversary of the nation's worst school massacre in history. Another this month happened at Columbine High School. "Being able to have the capacity to lockdown a school effectively is a really important safety tool,” says Amanda Klinger, a school safety educator and advocate. Klinger says although school lockdowns are needed, how they are conducted can be traumatic for students. “There is a cost,” she explains. “There is a cost to emotional anxiety cost.” Data shows 15 percent of all school lockdowns are related to threats, including bomb threats. Another 15 percent is related to police manhunts, and at least 61 percent were related to firearms. Klinger says for student’ mental well-being, we have to do better job communicating why they’re going on lockdown. She says schools should be more transparent with students, parents, and staff to help them better understand the situation and not promote panic. “We're going into a level 1 lockdown because they're serving a warrant in the neighborhood, so everyone can go, ‘OK, I’m not going to die today, probably, but we're just not going to go outside for recess,’" she says. Klinger says we should empower instead of intimidate. 1543

A British family has filed a complaint with the Department of Homeland Security over their detention by US immigration authorities, after saying they accidentally crossed the US border while vacationing in Canada, an account that has been strongly disputed by US officials.The family of seven, which includes a three-month-old baby, were detained earlier this month. They said that they ended up in the US after taking a wrong turn from British Columbia into Washington.A senior US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official, however, told CNN that by all appearances on the ground, the family was trying to get into the US undetected.In the complaint, the family said they have been "traumatized" by the experience. In a sworn statement, the family described the baby being forced to sleep on a "filthy concrete floor" in "frigid temperatures" during their first night in custody.The family said they crossed the border on October 3, after making a "very brief detour on an unmarked road to avoid an animal on the road" that landed them in the United States.Immigration officials tell a different version of the story. CBP released a statement on Tuesday evening further explaining the incident:"A vehicle was observed via remote video surveillance system turning west onto Avenue 0 in British Columbia, Canada, at approximately 9 p.m., Oct. 2. The vehicle then turned south and entered the U.S. illegally, by slowly and deliberately driving through a ditch onto Boundary Road in Blaine, Washington. The vehicle traveled west on Boundary Road continuing on the United States' side, and was pulled over by a Border Patrol agent a short time later. The seven occupants of the vehicle, who are citizens of the United Kingdom, were arrested at approximately 9:13 p.m., in accordance with law as established by the Immigration and Nationality Act for illegally entering the United States without inspection."The CBP senior official told CNN that the group had ,000 in cash on them when they were arrested.A second CBP official told CNN that the two adult men in the group had previously applied to enter the US under the ESTA Visa Waiver Program, but had their applications refused in March 2018. The official did not immediately know why they had their application refused.The group comprised of seven British citizens: two adults and their two-year-old twin daughters, and two related adults and their three-month-old baby boy. They were detained in Lynden, Washington, according to Aldea, The People's Justice Center that is working with the family.According to a statement provided to CNN affiliate WFMZ by Aldea, the group was traveling close to the border between Canada and the US."We made a very brief detour on an unmarked road to avoid an animal on the road. Soon, there was a police car behind our vehicle, flashing their lights and urging us to pull over," the family statement read.The family said they were detained after being told they had "crossed an international border." They added they had not intended to cross the border, and asked if they could simply turn around. According to the statement, the officer said "no."A UK Foreign Office spokesperson told CNN it was in contact with the family."We are providing assistance to a British family after they were taken into custody in the USA and are in close contact with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement," the spokesperson said.The family is being held at the Berks Family Residential Center in Pennsylvania, according to the ICE. That is one of three family residential centers in the United States.In a statement, ICE said the center provides "a safe and humane environment for families as they go through the immigration process." It added that it takes "approximately two weeks" to send an individual back to the UK. 3808

The NASA SpaceX Crew Dragon took off into the sky over the weekend. It was SpaceX’s first crewed mission in history. For some, it seemed like a pipe dream. But the launch’s success crested a renewed sense of hope for the future of the industry.“It’s one of those things where any success in the commercial space realm is beneficial to all of the players in that realm,” Dave Ruppel explained. Ruppel is the Director at the Colorado Air and Space Port, one of the 12 licensed spaceports in the U.S. approved for launching spacecraft.He said successful events like this help build interest and trust with the public. “Things like the SpaceX launch kind of bring the average person into that discussion, and help them realize how much is happening out there,” Ruppel said. “Now we know it’s going to be safe. We know it can be successful.”And it could create more opportunities for the general public to experience space. “Their goal is to make that a possibility more for the average person, not the superhuman NASA astronaut,” Ruppel said. Space travel has come a long way, from historical milestones to a possible vacation destination. “When you get into the 1960s and people actually start going into space, there are thoughts about how we might create some kind of place where people could go and visit,” said Jennifer Levasseur, Museum Curator at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. “Fantasies about space hotels or the future of space travel.”She said while more commercial trips are possible in the future, there are some factors to consider. One of those factors is price. “Even a flight on the least expensive means...is really pricey,” Levasseur said. “This is definitely an elite thing.”And then there is safety to consider. “Putting a person on top of that vehicle really complicates that scenario, it ups the risk factor,” she said. “For somebody to just buy a ticket and go there, there needs to be a different level of security with that.” Space Adventures is one of the private companies offering those trips. “Space flight is not a risk-free endeavor,” said Tom Shelley, President of Space Adventures. “We arranged for the very first fair paying private individual flight to space. That was Dennis Tito in 2001,” he explained. They offer a multitude of adventures. They offer suborbital flights that give participants five minutes in space for a price in the six figure category, to flights a couple hundred miles above the earth for multiple days, which costs a prettier penny. “It’s going to remain in the multi-millions, probably in the tens of millions of dollars in the foreseeable future,” Shelley said. “And that’s just to do with the pure physicals of what is involved.” He said as flights become more frequent, prices may come down. But that probably won’t happen anytime soon. “This was a big milestone. It’s been a long time coming. The SpaceX Dragon was conceived originally as a vehicle fair paying individuals would eventually be able to fly on,” Shelley explained. As scientists and visionaries bring us closer to the final frontier, the idea of space tourism still raises a lot of questions. “Every time we’re successful, we build on that confidence that we want people to have in the activities. It’s the same thing that’s happened over years in aviation. And today we are all very comfortable with going and taking a flight anywhere in the world,” Ruppel said.“It’s going to be a little while I think still, until we see legitimate what we think of as space tourism,” Levasseur said.  3549