山西哪有痔疮医院-【山西肛泰院】,HaKvMMCN,山西痔疮手术要多少钱,山西治女子痔疮,山西痔疮位置,太原便秘肛门疼痛,太原市医痔疮要多少钱,山西治疗痔疮那个医院
山西哪有痔疮医院太原肛门外湿漉漉,山西痔疮治疗在肛泰医院,山西缓解痔疮,太原痔疮形成原因,山西痔疮的治疗的方法,太原痔疮有什么区别,太原为什么我擦屁股有血
OCEANSIDE (KGTV) -- The beach may still be Oceanside’s biggest draw, but increasingly, people are coming for the beer.With seven breweries, several tap rooms and San Diego’s first meadery, Oceanside is earning a reputation among those looking for a pint.“They’ve brought a really interesting liveliness to Oceanside,” said the city’s economic development manager, Michelle Geller.Geller estimates Oceanside’s beer businesses have created 50 to 75 jobs, along with other economic benefits.LIFE IN OCEANSIDE:From 'Ocean Side' to region's third-largest city5 places to spend the day in Oceanside“It tends to give way to businesses that want to have their offices in the downtown,” she said. “Employees just like that creative culture of craft beer.”The oldest active brewery in Oceanside is Breakwater Brewing, the first to take up residence along Coast Highway. It opened in 2008 during the teeth of the Great Recession, when downtown had a different feel.“Lot of crime,” said co-owner Shannon Sager. “We had people grabbing money. Our tip jar had like in it once, people ran in, grabbed it and ran out. We started gluing it to the table. That doesn’t happen anymore.”As the downtown landscape shifted, more breweries opened nearby.“The next thing you know, it started taking off,” Sager said.Bagby Beer Company, Belching Beaver, Legacy Brewing, Northern Pine Brewing, Oceanside Brewing Company and Golden Coast Mead now round out Oceanside’s craft scene. The city’s first brewery, Oceanside Ale Works, closed in 2018 amid an internal dispute, but Geller said two more breweries are expected to open soon. 1614
OCEANSIDE, Calif. (KGTV) -- A hotel approved for Oceanside Boulevard is frustrating many residents.City leaders who supported the 99-room Fairfield Inn & Suite say concerns brought up about the location were addressed by staff.They also told 10News that, once complete, the hotel will bring in more than 0,000 tax dollars per year.Regardless, residents who live in the area say the site selected will create traffic problems. Beyond that - it will mean that their neighborhood will get noisy. "This location is difficult to get in and out of," one resident said. "There's no benefit to being right there."City leaders say the location is ideal because it's close to Interstate-5. 715
One of the biggest lingering questions following Wednesday's release of thousands pages of documents related to the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting is three phone calls Donald Trump Jr. placed to blocked telephone numbers before and after the meeting.Trump Jr.'s calls to blocked numbers — one of which occurred between phone calls with Emin Agalarov, the pop star son of Russian oligarch Aras Agalarov — have raised questions about who President Donald Trump's eldest son spoke to. Democrats have suggested Trump Jr.'s calls could have been to his father, but Trump Jr. said he did not know."So you don't know whether or not this might have been your father?" congressional investigators asked Trump Jr. during his interview, according to the transcript of the interview released by the Senate Judiciary Committee."I don't," Trump Jr. responded.CNN has reached out to Trump Jr.'s attorney for comment and have not yet received a response.The phone calls to blocked numbers are one of the key unanswered questions that Democrats — on both the Senate Judiciary and House Intelligence Committees — charge that Republican investigators failed to follow up on with subpoenas to Trump Jr. It's one of the items that could receive renewed scrutiny in the committees should Democrats win back either chamber in November.Trump Jr. has said he did not speak to his father about the Trump Tower meeting, in which he was expecting "dirt" on Hillary Clinton from a Russian lawyer, but instead received a pitch on removing Russian sanctions under the Magnitsky Act.The Judiciary Committee Democratic report released Wednesday highlighted the blocked calls, the first of which was a four-minute call June 6 less than an hour after Emin Agalarov, who had pushed for the Trump Tower meeting, had called Trump Jr. After calling the blocked number, Trump Jr. called back Agalarov. He told the committee that he did not believe he spoke with Emin Agalarov in either phone call, but that voice messages may have been exchanged.Trump Jr. also called a blocked number that evening in a call that lasted 11 minutes.Then-candidate Trump spent that day at Trump Tower, and had no public events.The Judiciary Committee Democrats noted that while Trump Jr. said he didn't know who he called, Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski had testified to the House Intelligence Committee that Trump's "primary residence has a blocked (phone) line."Roughly two hours after the Trump Tower meeting occurred on June 9, Trump Jr. placed another call to a blocked number that lasted three minutes, according to the Democratic report. It doesn't appear Trump Jr. was asked about that specific call during the interview.The Judiciary Committee Democrats also highlighted in their report an announcement from Trump ahead of the Trump Tower meeting that he would be giving a "major speech" the following week, in which "we're going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place with the Clintons. I think you're going to find it very informative and very, very interesting."Democrats have urged Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican, to bring Trump Jr. back for a follow up interview, as well as to subpoena his phone records to find out who he called."There is a lot that needs to be explained, the contradictions and evasions," Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, said Wednesday.Asked about a subpoena for Trump Jr.'s records, Grassley said he put out the transcripts in the interest of transparency, and added that he would want to know what questions Democrats would want to ask if he were to consider bringing him back."I have no decision now," Grassley said. "In fact, it's just come to my attention, not only through your question but a few minutes ago."The-CNN-Wire 3785
OCEANSIDE, Calif. (KGTV) — Oceanside's famous "Top Gun" house has been moved to its permanent spot amid construction of a new beach resort.The famed "Graves House" was moved last February to allow construction to begin on the Oceanside Beach Resort, before returned to its final spot last Thursday.In the 1986 action flick, the rare Victorian home served as the residence of the character Charlie. Since, it's become a local cinematic treasure in addition to other areas of San Diego, like Kansas City BBQ, featured in the film.RELATED: Oceanside 'Top Gun' home relocated, to be restored as new hotel moves forwardThe iconic cottage was then restored, according to developed S.D. Malkin Properties, Inc. The home underwent structural improvements and cosmetic detailing to help the home retain its Victorian features.The developer is looking at ways to incorporate the Graves House into commercial uses that are accessible to the public. 946
OCEANSIDE (CNS) - An attempted murder of a peace officer conviction was overturned Friday for a man accused of intentionally running down a motorcycle officer during a routine traffic stop in Oceanside, after an appellate court ruled that his attorney ignored the defendant's argument that he was innocent of the crime.Roberto Ignacio Flores was sentenced to 29 years to life in prison for allegedly running his car into Oceanside Police Officer Brad Hunter on June 19, 2017, leaving the officer hospitalized with life-threatening injuries that kept him out of the field for just over six months.While Flores contended that he was not the driver of the Dodge Neon that struck Hunter, Flores' attorney, John Wilshke, argued at trial that Flores was the driver, but did not have the intent to kill required for an attempted murder conviction.RELATED: Oceanside officer targeted in hit-and-run is back homeFlores also disagreed with his lawyer's concession on weapons possession charges related to a collection of guns found at his home.A three justice panel ruled Friday that Flores' sixth amendment rights were violated, as he was not allowed to present the defense of his choice.The Hunters released this statement to 10News:"Obviously we are very disappointed in the decision by the 4th DCA but confident that a retrial will result in another conviction - Attempted Murder of a Peace Officer - and the appropriate sentence. It's a shame our justice system indulges games such as the ones he is playing - subjecting the victims of horrific crimes like this one to further emotional distress and further wasting the tax payers money but we are confident that justice will ultimately prevail."In a statement, The Oceanside Police Department said: "Regardless of the court’s decision, it is our continued hope that Flores is brought to justice for the willful assault on Officer Hunter."Trial prosecutor Keith Watanabe, who said he is preparing for a retrial, described the defendant as "very dangerous and evil" and said Flores "bragged about striking the officer and putting him in a wheelchair." "We are disappointed by the ruling. When Flores was sentenced to 29 years to life in prison, we believed justice was served and that we would never have to see him again. Unfortunately, we face the daunting task of having to take him to trial all over again.," Watanabe told 10News. "He proved himself to be erratic and dangerous and we will do everything in our power to protect police officers and the community. He will be re-tried. ""I spoke to Officer Brad Hunter’s family. They are discouraged and frustrated by the injustice of having to see Flores in court all over again. Though justice was delayed, they intend to persist until they finally see Flores sent away for good," he added.RELATED: Suspect arrested for attempted murder of Oceanside motorcycle officerAccording to facts laid out in the appellate panel's ruling, Flores was angry at law enforcement following his March 2017 arrest on the gun possession charges. While in jail, he called his girlfriend and told her to claim she owned the guns, since she didn't have a prior felony conviction, the ruling states.He also said the officers "harassed and mocked him" and swore "that when he was released he would go after the people who were responsible," according to the ruling.On June 19, Hunter, a 29-year veteran of the department, was struck while pulling over a driver for an expired registration near Oceanside Boulevard and Foussat Road.RELATED: Injured Oceanside officer hit by driver now awake, 'in good spirits'Flores, who was not involved in the traffic stop, allegedly accelerated and veered directly into Hunter, scooping him up and flipping him over the defendant's car. Hunter suffered head injuries and his leg was broken in three places. The officer had to be placed in a coma until swelling on the brain subsided. Hunter testified he has no memory of the crash.Flores sped away but was captured a few minutes later, Watanabe said.Once in a jail cell, Flores told a sheriff's detective posing as an inmate and a confidential informant that he intended to hit Hunter and wasn't sorry about it, according to the prosecutor."He (Flores) said, `I got one. I got one,"' Watanabe said, referring to the defendant hitting a police officer.RELATED: Driver accused of hitting an Oceanside motorcycle cop will stand trialThe appellate court based its ruling on McCoy v Louisiana, a case recently ruled on by the U.S. Supreme Court. In that case, Robert McCoy was accused of murdering three of his wife's family members. While McCoy sought to maintain his innocence at trial, his attorney pursued a defense that involved admitting to the killings. In a bid to avoid the death penalty, McCoy's attorney argued that the defendant suffered from severe mental issues, and pursued a second-degree murder conviction instead.Jurors recommended death sentences, but McCoy's convictions were overturned and a new trial was ordered. 4999