临沂算命灵的地方南京哪里算命特别准，哪个地方算卦准介绍下,望江哪里算命准,绥阳算命需要多少钱,武山算命准点的地方,云浮哪里有算命比较准的人,邵武有没有算命算的很清楚的先生,赣州哪位知道周边有算卦比较准的地方

California Rep. Eric Swalwell is expected to announce Monday that he's dropping out of the 2020 race for president, according to a source familiar with his plans.Swalwell is expected to make the announcement at a 4 p.m. ET news conference at his campaign headquarters in California, concluding a short-lived bid for the Democratic nomination that failed to gain any traction.A spokesperson for Swalwell's campaign declined to comment.Swalwell announced his long shot presidential bid in April, pledging to mount a campaign that focused on the need for generational change in the Democratic Party and his commitment to confronting gun violence in the United States.Swalwell, though, failed to gain traction in a crowded Democratic field and only qualified for the first set of Democratic debates because of the Democratic National Committee's 1% poll standard, not because of grassroots support.Swalwell recently canceled a two-day trip to New Hampshire on July 3 and 4, in the first signal that his campaign might be coming to an end.The high point of his campaign was likely his direct and blunt challenge to former Vice President Joe Biden, the race's frontrunner, during the late June debates, where the California Democrat noted that he was six years old when "a presidential candidate came to the California Democratic convention and said it's time to pass the torch to a new generation of Americans.""That candidate was then-Sen. Joe Biden," Swalwell added as the crowd gasped. "He was right when he said that 32 years ago. He is still right today."Biden shot back: "I'm holding onto that torch. I want to make it clear."But that was not enough to sustain Swalwell's campaign, which struggled to gain attention in the Democratic field despite the candidate's availability to media.Swalwell, throughout his campaign, urged Democrats to "go big and be bold." He proposed a gun buyback program to get certain weapons off America streets and said he would fund a study on gun violence.Standing outside the National Rifle Association headquarters in Virginia in June, Swalwell said, "We're not just here to stand up to the NRA ... we're here to beat the NRA."But Swalwell's campaign, at times, was often defined by awkward moments, like when he looked to deliver a clever line at the June Iowa Democratic Party's Hall of Fame celebration."I will be bold without the bull," the congressman said to a quiet audience. 2427

Beto O'Rourke said this week he has made a decision about his political future -- and signs increasingly point to him running for president in 2020.O'Rourke aides have spoken with Democratic operatives in recent weeks about a presidential campaign. This week those conversations have begun shifting to a more formal discussion of staff positions with the eventual campaign, a person familiar with the talks said, though no job offers have been made.Another change happened nine days ago: O'Rourke took the "for Texas" out of his digital presence. Emails sent from his team that used to come from BetoForTexas.com are now coming from BetoORourke.com. And while previously BetoORourke.com had redirected to his website from last year's Senate campaign, it's now the opposite.The shift was a small but telling sign as the former Texas congressman rules out another US Senate run and is on the verge of announcing his plans.Anticipation in his hometown for a presidential run is building, but O'Rourke's friends and family say they are still waiting to hear from him about whether he will run and when he'll announce it."I think he should do it. I really do," his sister Charlotte O'Rourke said Thursday in an interview with CNN in her El Paso home. "I just think he has that way with people more than anybody does.""Honestly, everybody's on board for him to do what he wants," she said.She said O'Rourke had discussed the pros and cons of a presidential campaign in depth with his family several weeks ago, but that -- as of Thursday morning -- he had not yet told them what he planned to do.O'Rourke aides have begun reactivating the massive email list he built during his failed Senate bid in the 2018 midterm elections. It had been dormant since December, until O'Rourke's team sent five emails over the last eight days -- a step that could help remove inactive addresses, re-engage recipients and prevent new messages from being sent to spam ahead of a major announcement.The two most recent emails asked recipients to take a survey about the issues most important to them, how they might work for a campaign and how to reach them -- the sort of information campaigns regularly collect about individual supporters they hope to turn into donors and volunteers.Sticking to the end-of-February timeline he'd laid out to Oprah Winfrey weeks earlier, O'Rourke said in a statement Wednesday that he and his wife, Amy O'Rourke, "have made a decision about how we can best serve our country. We are excited to share it with everyone soon.""I want to make the announcement to everyone at the same time. I want to do it the right way," a smiling O'Rourke told CNN on Wednesday night before speaking at a Moms Demand Action event in El Paso.Those close to him read his comments -- and the reality that if he didn't intend to become a candidate, he could have just said so -- as implying a presidential campaign is likely."It seemed almost like a telling statement, in a way. But I don't know," Charlotte O'Rourke said.O'Rourke has called some of his closest political allies outside El Paso in recent days, one person who spoke with him this week said. That person declined to reveal the details of their conversation but touted O'Rourke as a strong presidential contender.Anticipating a presidential announcement is coming soon, two groups that launched in recent months attempting to draft O'Rourke into the presidential race and lay groundwork for his campaign in the early-voting states are preparing to activate the lists of supporters they've built, as well.One group prepared an email blast to send its 30,000 subscribers to O'Rourke's website upon its launch. The group's leaders also circled back with activists in early-voting states who had hosted events to organize volunteers for an O'Rourke campaign in recent days.Another group launched a "Beto Alert," planning to notify its 7,000 email subscribers and 2,500 text message subscribers as soon as O'Rourke announces his plans and direct them to his donation webpage.Near O'Rourke's house, a neighbor, Michael Reyes, printed his own stickers to cover the "for Senate" in his Beto yard sign with "for president.""He has a lot of potential and you can see it. You can see it. Um, and the whole fact that he's just a nice guy, a regular guy, we kind of need somebody like that up there that has the view of the regular people," Reyes said.For months, O'Rourke has said publicly and in conversations with friends that his biggest hesitation about a presidential run is the time away from his three children -- Ulysses, 12; Molly, 10; and Henry, 8 -- after spending nearly two years largely on the road during his Senate run.O'Rourke attended high school at a boarding school in Virginia, and then college in New York City, in part due to a strained relationship with his own father, Pat O'Rourke, who was a local politician. The two rebuilt their relationship and became much closer when O'Rourke moved back to El Paso in his 20s, his sister said, before his father was killed when a car struck his bicycle in 2001. People close to O'Rourke said they think that history could shape his thinking."I think he feels almost like he's abandoning his kids, and what trauma is that going to leave on them," Charlotte O'Rourke said. She said O'Rourke's conversations with family have focused on the logistics of him and at times his wife being on the campaign trail.O'Rourke "really put it all on the line for a while there and he invested so much into being away from his family, and I know how badly he wanted to be with them," said Tony Casas, a friend who O'Rourke hired at his former internet services firm Stanton Street and who designed O'Rourke's black-and-white Senate campaign logo.Friends said O'Rourke was particularly concerned about how a run would impact his elder son.Steve Ortega, an O'Rourke friend and fellow former city councilman, said he was at O'Rourke's house during this year's college football national championship game."Beto had stepped out of the room and I asked Ulysses, 'How's it having your dad back?' And he says, 'It's awesome, I love it,' " Ortega said. "He's at the age where spending time with your parents is still cool."O'Rourke has said lately, though, that after spending time at home with his children in recent months, they are more supportive.In an early February interview with Winfrey in New York City, he joked that Ulysses "is about ready for me to leave the house."On Wednesday night, O'Rourke -- who had ridden a bicycle several blocks to the pro-gun-control group's event -- declined to offer any additional details about the timeline to reveal his decision about a 2020 presidential campaign or how he would do so."I'm going to make an announcement soon. I'm going to be making the same announcement to everyone at the same time," he told CNN. "That's all I can say at this time." 6886

Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday he expects to release a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's nearly report "within a week," but he does not plan to provide Congress with an unredacted version of the report, setting the stage for a showdown with congressional Democrats.Barr told a House subcommittee Tuesday that the redactions process was going "very well," and he would explain the rationale for the redactions that are made from Mueller's nearly 400-page report. But he said he would not accede to Democrats' demands that he provide the full, unredacted report to Congress, arguing that he cannot legally release grand jury material and that he did not plan to ask a court to release it."I don't intend at this stage to send the full, unredacted report to the committee," Barr said.Barr's comments Tuesday come ahead of a brewing clash between Congress and the Trump administration over the Mueller report, as Democrats are indeed prepared to go to court in an effort to obtain the unredacted Mueller report and the special counsel's underlying evidence. Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have already authorized a subpoena for the full Mueller report and the underlying evidence, which House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said Tuesday he is waiting to see what Barr releases before moving forward on the subpoena."The question is what we receive -- do we receive a full copy of the Mueller Report and the documentation underneath it?" Nadler said. "Do we receive most of it with a little redaction or do they completely expurgate it? We'll have to take a look at it."Asked Tuesday about the grand jury material, Barr told a House Appropriations subcommittee: "The chairman of the Judiciary Committee is free to go to court."Four types of information would be redacted from the report he submits, Barr said, including grand jury material, classified information, material tied to ongoing investigation, and information that could harm "peripheral third parties."Barr defends four-page summaryDemocrats pressed Barr on his decision to release a four-page summary of Mueller's conclusions, particularly in light of reports that some on Mueller's team have told others they were unsatisfied with how Barr characterized the investigation.Barr said that Mueller was given the opportunity to review the summary Barr released last month detailing the Mueller's conclusions, and the special counsel declined to do so. He said he suspected that members of Mueller's team wanted more from him, but he explained that he wasn't trying to summarize the full report with his four-page letter, which stated Mueller's investigation did not establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump's team and Russia, and that Mueller reached no conclusion on the question of obstruction of justice."I suspect that they probably wanted more put out," Barr said. "In my view, I was not interested in putting out summaries or trying to summarize, because I think any summary, regardless of who prepares it, not only runs the risk of being under-inclusive or over-inclusive, but also, would trigger a lot of discussion and analysis that really should await everything coming out at once."Barr said the White House did not review his letter, but he declined to answer questions about whether the White House has been briefed on the report."I've already laid out the process that is going forward to release these reports hopefully within a week. And I'm not going to say anything more about it until the report is out and everyone has a chance to look at it," Barr said.Barr's answers did not appear to satisfy Democrats, who repeatedly urged Barr to release the full report and fully explain any redactions that Barr decided to make."I think it would strike a serious blow to our system, and yes, to our democracy, if that report is not fully seen," said New York Rep. Jose Serrano, the chairman of the Commerce, Science and Justice Subcommittee holding Tuesday's hearing. "We're not here today to be in a confrontational situation with you. We want to help you do the job, and you need to help us do ours."House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita Lowey told Barr that his handling of Mueller's report was "unacceptable" and the summary he released "raises more questions than it answers.""I look forward to reviewing the Mueller report myself, and I know my constituents do as well," Lowey said. "I understand that portions of it must be redacted as a matter of law, but my hope is that you will stop there and bring transparency to this process as soon as possible."Republican lawmakers, on the other hand, have not so far asked questions about Mueller and are focusing on budget issues in the hearing. GOP Rep. Robert Aderholt of Alabama, the top Republican on the subcommittee, did not mention Mueller in his opening statement.Barr is scheduled to return to Capitol Hill on May 1 and May 2 for hearings before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees specifically to answer questions about the Mueller investigation.Barr told Congress earlier this month he expected to release a redacted version of Mueller's nearly 400-page report by "mid-April, if not sooner." 5184

As the race for president in 2020 continues to heat up, data privacy experts say people should be taking a closer look at laws surrounding your data. "One of the toughest things is that for most of us, being online is no longer an optional thing; it's a mandatory thing," says Jennifer King, director of consumer privacy at The Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School. King tracks consumer privacy issues across the board. "In terms of the data that’s collected about you, it’s a pretty tough scenario," she says. "There is a lot of data collection that happens without our knowledge. Some people argue you consent to it, but because the consent is usually buried in a long terms and conditions and privacy policy, and so you consent, but most of us don’t read documents or be expected to practically.” King says companies like Facebook and Google have so much power over people's information because of a lack of laws and oversight. "We don’t have any laws frankly that restrict data collection or data use mostly across the board,” she explains. "There are particular areas where data collection is protected, so for instance in the health context, but that’s with a medical provider, so the world of Fit Bits and health tracking. [What] people do online, that’s not covered by privacy law.”She says people should care about data privacy, even if they have nothing to hide.“I hear that a lot, ‘I have nothing to hide. I'm not doing anything wrong,’ so it kind of assumes that privacy is about hiding things," she says. "I would argue it's about a lot more just controlling who you are and your ability to do things in the world.”When it comes to election season, King says she'd like to see more people with a better understand of the tech world in Washington. "Certainly, there is not enough. So, there is a real need for technological expertise in Congress,” she says. “That doesn’t necessarily mean elected officials. I would not expect most elected officials to come out of software companies. I would actually argue we’d be better off if we didn’t have our elected officials coming out of Silicon Valley, for example.”King hopes there will be more “reasonable protections” for consumers in the next few years. "There is only so much you can do as an individual, and that’s why it’s important to say that to pressure elected representatives to say that you want real data laws," she says. 2421

CANTON, Ohio — Thousands of people across the United States are in need of a bone marrow transplant. Three of them happen to be 140