柏乡算命比较准的人武邑算命准的人,永年算卦准的地方,皋兰算卦好的地方,醴陵算命准的人,方城哪里有算卦准的,沈阳算命如何,塔河什么地方算命准

Flash flooding was prompting rescues from homes and cars Thursday morning in the Philadelphia area, including southern New Jersey, where high water also closed parts of Interstate 295 for hours.The flooding is part of the same system that 251

HOLLYWOOD, Calif. – A Hollywood family therapist died over the weekend after being found unresponsive on the ground below a third story balcony. The 161

Flights for some refugees who were approved to come to the United States have been canceled, according to sources familiar with the matter.The move has sparked concern among resettlement agencies that have booked travel for refugees into October, anticipating the continuation of arrivals in the upcoming fiscal year. It also has the potential of leaving some refugees who were approved to come to the US in limbo."It concerns me that our local offices have done a bunch of work and started to make plans for these cases to come. It's so atypical," said Rachel Pollock, director of resettlement services for United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, one of the nine resettlement agencies that work with the State Department to place refugees."No one really knows what's coming or what's going to happen. It seems like a further move away from what we've come to expect from this program," Pollock added.The International Organization for Migration, which is in charge of booking refugees on their travel, sent cancellation notices out Monday morning.A notice obtained by CNN includes the travel itinerary for individuals whose travel was booked for October and canceled. The stated reason for cancellation: "FY20 moratorium extension."The notice doesn't provide an end date for the extension.The State Department's Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration directed the International Organization for Migration to send the notifications, according to a department spokesperson, who added the moratorium is being extended through October 21. The department is working with the organization to rebook the flights contingent upon the refugee admissions ceiling for fiscal year 2020.The notices come on the heels of President Donald Trump's arrival to the United Nations General Assembly. Last year, Trump set the refugee cap to 30,000, the lowest level since 1980. The administration has been nearing that ceiling as the fiscal year comes to a close. As of August 2019, more than 28,000 refugees had been admitted to the US, according to data from the Refugee Processing Center.It's unclear where the current number of arrivals stands, and why the administration is pushing a moratorium into October."Every year, we have an arrivals moratorium. I've never seen a moratorium go past a week," a source said, noting that there's typically a break in the first week of October as agencies prepare for the next onslaught of refugees in the new fiscal year.The cancellations could be particularly troubling for refugees whose medical exams or security checks, for example, are on the cusp of expiring."The first thing is to obviously let our local resettlement offices know. They have the deeply upsetting task of telling families who have been waiting for years that there's a delay," Naomi Steinberg, vice president for policy and advocacy at HIAS, one of the resettlement agencies. "These are real families that are going to be torn apart by this for who knows how much longer."The administration has yet to announce next year's cap.Earlier this month, senior Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee 3116

Homelessness can carry a stigma. But data shows there are many factors that contribute to the crisis.As many as 3.5 million Americans are homeless, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. It says most of those people live on the streets or in a shelter.That’s just one definition. It doesn’t count the 7.5 million Americans who live with others because of high housing costs.The newest data shows the homeless population is mostly male, white and middle-aged. But the crisis goes far beyond that. More Americans are homeless today compared to before the Great Recession.The list of contributing factors is growing. One of the big ones is affordable housing.More than one-quarter of renters pay their landlords at least half their monthly income, 780

Four young women who say they were sex trafficked are suing chains that own Atlanta-area hotels where, the women allege, they were not only forced to perform sex acts for money, but hotel staff helped their traffickers in exchange for a cut of the profits.Hotel staff are accused of ignoring signs that should have tipped them off that the women were being trafficked, including that their traffickers had multiple rooms under one name, dozens of men visited the same rooms each day and there were an "extraordinary number of used condoms" in the rooms' trashcans, the lawsuits said.In exchange for a slice of the money, hotel staff members would stand guard or warn the traffickers when police were on the premises and when guests complained, according to the lawsuits."These lawsuits demonstrate what we all know: Hotels know about sex trafficking, hotels participate in sex trafficking and hotels make money from sex trafficking," attorney Jonathan Tonge, who represents the four plaintiffs, said in a statement. "When the choice comes down to leaving a room empty or renting that room to sex traffickers, the hotels in these lawsuits consistently chose to rent the room to sex traffickers."In four federal lawsuits filed Monday, the accusers -- all identified as Jane Does -- say they were forced to perform the sex acts between 2010 and 2016 at a Red Roof Inn in Smyrna, a Suburban Extended Stay in Chamblee, a La Quinta Inn in Alpharetta and an Extended Stay America in Atlanta.Extended Stay America did not respond to CNN's request for comment. The other three chains released statements saying their hotels were operated by franchisees; Red Roof Inn and Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, which owns La Quinta but is not named in the suit, condemned human trafficking. None of the chains spoke to specific allegations.The traffickers advertised the plaintiffs, at least two of them 15 and 16 years old at the time, and subjected them to "violent beatings, controlled and forced drug use, manipulation, threats, fraud and coercion," the lawsuits say. The traffickers also traded the plaintiffs among each other, according to the lawsuits.Some of the plaintiffs had to meet a quota of ,000, requiring them to see 10 or more men each day, two of the plaintiffs said.The activity continued for years despite police stings, police and guest complaints to management and online reviews detailing the alleged drug and prostitution activity at the hotels, according to the lawsuit. In the case of the Red Roof Inn, someone purporting to be the manager responded to some negative reviews on TripAdvisor, the lawsuit says.Atlanta officials have long complained about the sex trafficking industry.The city ranks third in the country in terms of reports of human trafficking, according to Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms.The lawsuits cite a study commissioned by the US Department of Justice that says Atlanta is one of the most profitable cities in the country for sex traffickers. In 2007, Atlanta's sex trafficking economy was worth 0 million annually and traffickers reported average weekly earnings of about ,000, the lawsuit said, citing the study.The allegations in the lawsuits include:? At the Red Roof Inn, signs in the reception area said, "NO REFUNDS AFTER 15 MINUTES," the lawsuit alleges, providing two photographs of the signage. The hotel staff put up the sign "so that commercial sex acts cannot be accomplished quickly at the Smyrna Red Roof Inn without also paying for a room," according to the lawsuit.? At the Suburban Extended Stay (then owned by Choice Hotels), employees offered a trafficker a room in the "usual spot," the lawsuits say. In one instance, the lawsuit alleges, a plaintiff asked a hotel employee for a ride or a cellphone so she could escape, and "the man told her he could not give her a ride. The employee then told the trafficker that the victim had tried to get his help to escape. That night, the victim's trafficker ... came to the victim's room and ruthlessly beat her for confiding in the employee and trying to escape, saying, 'You think somebody is going to help you? None of these people are going to help you.'"? At the La Quinta Inn, employees told a trafficker to "use the back door" and provided him extra key cards so customers could enter through the back door inconspicuously, according to the lawsuit. One one occasion, a trafficker beat a woman for six hours, videotaping much of it and leaving blood on the hotel room's walls, while the staff did nothing, the lawsuit alleges.? At the Extended Stay America, "sex trafficking ... was so pervasive and condoned that upon learning that Plaintiff was being trafficked, the front desk employee revealed that he kept lingerie outfits behind the counter for sale. The employee pulled out bags of outfits and tried to sell the lingerie to Plaintiff," according to the lawsuit.How the chains respondedExtended Stay America's corporate office did not respond to CNN's request for comment.Red Roof Inn issued a statement saying it "condemns, and has zero tolerance for, human trafficking and child exploitation" and expects its franchisees to comply with the law. The chain will cooperate with law enforcement, but it cannot comment on the lawsuits, the statement said.Choice Hotels, which owns Suburban Extended Stay, said only, "As a franchise business, all the hotels in our system are independently owned and operated. We cannot comment on any specifics regarding pending litigation."Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, which is not named in the suit but owns La Quinta, said it works with numerous organizations "to enhance our policies condemning human trafficking while also providing training to help our team members, as well as the hotels we manage, identify and report trafficking activities."We also make training opportunities available for our franchised hotels, which are independently owned and operated. As the matter is subject to pending litigation, we're unable to comment further at this time," Wyndham's statement said.The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages. 6083