衡水算命需要多少钱(广安算命准的人) (今日更新中)

(CNN) -- Pete Buttigieg called it "unwatchable." Amy Klobuchar warned that "a house divided cannot stand." Julián Castro said what was unfolding on stage was "called an election."Democrats met for their third debate of the 2020 presidential primary Thursday night in Houston. With the field narrowed to just 10 candidates who qualified for the stage, it was messy, and at times nasty.The night featured Castro launching a series of risky attacks on the front-runner in national polls, former Vice President Joe Biden. It saw fellow Texan Beto O'Rourke have his best moments yet on home-state turf. And it offered another gauge of how the party's raging debate over health care is evolving, with Biden leading the centrist candidates in fighting back more forcefully against "Medicare for All."Buttigieg, the South Bend, Indiana, mayor, tried at one point to pull Democrats out of the mud."This is why presidential debates are becoming unwatchable. Because this reminds everybody of what they cannot stand about Washington. Scoring points against each other, poking at each other, and telling each other that, 'My plan, your plan,'" he said.That's when Castro, the former Housing and Urban Development secretary and the chief instigator Thursday night, interjected."Yeah, that's called the Democratic Primary Election, Pete. That's called an election. That's an election. You know?" he said. "This is what we're here for. It's an election."Here are seven takeaways from the third Democratic debate:1. Castro's launches an attack on Biden Much of the pre-debate hype focused on the potential for an ideological clash between Biden and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who were sharing the stage for the first time.But it was Castro, a member of former President Barack Obama's Cabinet, who came ready to brawl with party's front-runner.Criticizing Obama over deportations, Castro said of Biden: "He wants to get credit for Obama's work, but not have to answer any questions.""I stand with Barack Obama all eight years, good, bad and indifferent. That's where I stand," Biden responded.The back-and-forth raised questions about what Obama's legacy really is -- and how Democratic voters want to see it furthered. Do they want to elevate his loyal vice president? Or are they looking for what Obama once was: A young, inspirational candidate to lead them into the future?It's not clear that Castro qualifies as the latter. His attacks on Biden perhaps weakened Biden but also risked alienating Democratic voters, who largely like all their leading candidates, including the former vice president.The most stunning of their exchanges was the first one, when Castro launched a very-thinly-veiled assault over a topic other Democrats have only gingerly broached: Biden's age.He accused the former vice president of "forgetting what you said two minutes ago" during an exchange over whether Biden's health care plan would require Americans who want to sign up for his Medicare-style public option would have to buy into it.Then, he tried to twist the knife, saying: "I'm fulfilling the legacy of Barack Obama and you are not."Castro told CNN's Chris Cuomo after the debate that the comment was "not intended as a personal attack or affront.""This is a debate. And when we're talking about health care policy, we're talking about a policy that impacts every single person in this country," Castro said.On CNN after the debate, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker implied Castro had taken a "cheap shot" and said that "tone and tenor are important," even as he also insisted Castro's attacks reflected broader concerns about Biden."I think that we are at a tough point right now, because there's a lot of people who are concerned about Joe Biden's ability to carry the ball across the end line without fumbling. And I think that Castro had some really legitimate concerns about, can he be someone in a long, grueling campaign who can get the ball over the line? And he has every right to call that out," Booker said.There's another possibility to consider. Castro has been a contender for the Democratic vice presidential nomination before. If another candidate on stage Thursday night (other than Biden) wins the nomination and is looking for an attack dog for a running mate, Castro gave them something to think about.2. Biden vs. Warren and Sanders on health careDemocrats' differences on how to achieve universal health coverage has dominated the opening portions of all three debates. The only difference Thursday night was that all the leading candidates were on stage.Biden was quick to criticize Warren, who supports Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' Medicare for All plan in which private insurance would effectively be ended and all Americans would be enrolled in a government program.Instead, Biden said, he is offering a more modest proposal that builds on Obamacare by giving Americans the option to buy into a Medicare-style program -- but doesn't require it."I know the senator says she is for Bernie," Biden said. "Well, I am for Barack."Warren attempted to defuse Biden's approach by praising the former president. "We all owe a huge debt to President Obama, who fundamentally transformed health care in America and committed this country to health care for every human being," she said.The former vice president went on offense, pressing Sanders and Warren on how they would foot the 10-year, trillion bill for their proposal.Sanders reminded viewers that he "wrote the damn bill" -- which is notable because health care is the rare issue on which Warren does not have her own plan; she backs Sanders' Medicare for All proposal. And he argued it's "the most cost-effective approach to providing health care" to everyone in the country.Warren ducked a question on whether she would raise middle-class taxes to pay for Medicare for All. And the way she framed her non-answer -- focusing on the overall cost of health care, rather than whether it's paid via income taxes or deductibles and co-pays -- showed how she could make her case in a general election."The richest individuals and the biggest corporations are going to pay more, and middle-class families are going to pay less. That's how this is going to work," she said.3. The centrists fight backBiden got some back-up on health care Thursday night from his fellow moderates in the race -- most pointedly, Buttigieg and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar."While Bernie wrote the bill, I read the bill," Klobuchar said. "And on page 8 -- on page 8 of the bill, it says that we will no longer have private insurance as we know it. And that means that 149 million Americans will no longer be able to have their current insurance.""The problem, Sen. Sanders, with that damn bill that you wrote and that Sen. Warren backs is that it doesn't trust the American people," Buttigieg said. Turning to the audience, he said, "I trust you to choose what makes the most sense for you, not my way or the highway."It was a notable shift in the tenor of a health care debate that had, to this point in the race, largely been dominated by the progressive candidates. In the first debate, liberal agitators like New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio were there to pounce against candidates who were not eager to eliminate private insurance. And in the second debate, Warren and Sanders stood side-by-side and batted away criticism from candidates who didn't qualify for the third debate.4. Beto breaks outIn front of a home-state crowd, former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke finally had the kind of night that showed why he'd once been seen as a phenom.His biggest moment came when he forcefully argued for the mandatory buyback of assault-style firearms."Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We're not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore," he said.O'Rourke's comment positioned him as a leader in the party's push for gun control (to the chagrin of New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, who had advanced a similar proposal earlier).That's right where O'Rourke wants to be, in the wake of the early August mass shooting in his hometown of El Paso that he has said changed him as a candidate. And it was teed up by other Democrats, including Biden, California Sen. Kamala Harris and Castro, who praised him for how he'd returned home to try to help El Paso heal.Another big moment for O'Rourke came at the end of a riff on racism, when he said of Trump: "We have a white supremacist in the White House and he poses a mortal threat to people of color across this country."O'Rourke's campaign was ready for a spike in Google searches and social media traffic that followed. His website was overhauled to feature a menacing red image of Trump with the words "The President of the United States of America is a white supremacist" -- as well as lots of links to Trump's racist comments.5. Harris shifts her focusIn the first debate, it was Harris who had been Biden's chief tormenter -- earning her a surge up the polls that wound up fizzling in July and August.So she tried a new approach Thursday night, instead taking aim at Trump.She dedicated her entire opening statement to Trump, addressing him directly as if he was watchin -- which was unlikely, given his speaking engagement in Baltimore -- before closing by saying, "And now, President Trump, you can go back to watching Fox News."Explaining her shift in strategy to CNN after the debate, Harris said, "My whole campaign is about that and that's why I'm running to unseat him.""Listen, I believe that there is one common goal that we all have that we need to focus on. And frankly, when we think about this discussion among Democrats, everyone I think should be really clear about pointing out of course, where we disagree, but the ultimate goal has to be to understand that we need a president United States who understands that we need to bring people together," she said.She tried to be a unifying voice during the health care debate. "Let's talk about the fact that Donald Trump came into office and spent almost the entire first year of his term trying to get rid of the Affordable Care Act," she said.She also praised the architects of Obamacare, which laid the groundwork for the moderate candidates' plans, and Medicare for All."I want to give credit first to Barack Obama for really bringing us this far," she said, then added: "I want to give credit to Bernie. Take credit, Bernie."6. Buttigieg's 'setback'Near the end of the debate, ABC moderators asked the candidates an unusual question: What had been their most significant professional setback?It opened the door for Buttigieg, who is gay, to remind viewers of the historic nature of his candidacy -- and what he has overcome to get into the upper tiers of Democratic presidential candidates."As a military officer serving under 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' and as an elected official in the state of Indiana when Mike Pence was governor," he said, "at a certain point, when it came to professional setbacks, I had to wondering whether just acknowledging who I was going to be the ultimate career-ending professional setback."7. They've got jokesDemocrats tried to be funny.Sometimes they failed -- like when Klobuchar, referring to Trump, went for the too-obvious "Houston, we have a problem," or when Harris needled Biden over his resistance to executive orders on guns by saying, "Instead of saying 'no we can't,' let's say 'yes we can.'"Entrepreneur Andrew Yang went with a stereotype. "I am Asian, so I know a lot of doctors," he said.Others deserved a little bit of a chuckle. The bald Booker, for example, said of the Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, "I'm the only person on this stage that finds Trudeau's hair menacing."Harris, meanwhile, said of Trump that "on trade policy, he reminds me of that guy in 'The Wizard of Oz.' When you pull back the curtain, it's a really small dude."The vegan Booker, who doesn't have children but is the campaign's most frequent teller of dad jokes, was asked whether Iowans and Texans should follow his example. "First of all I want to say: no. I want to translate that into Spanish: No," he said. 12135

(KGTV) - Dramatic video shows how a plane crash and rescue of the pilot and passenger unfolded off the coast of Northern California. David Lesh purchased his Beechcraft Bonanza a few weeks ago and asked a fellow pilot to record aerial video from a second plane. “We were gonna go fly over the Golden Gate bridge, and do a whole bay tour... obviously didn't make it there,” Lesh said. During the flight, Lesh lost all power five miles off Half Moon Bay Harbor. “I would guess that we probably didn't have much more than maybe a minute or two from the time I figured something was wrong to the time we hit the water,” said Lesh. Lesh’s friend Owen Leipelt was piloting the second plane and watched as Lesh went down. “At one point I lost them. I had been circling and I couldn't see them anymore and David called me on the phone as he was bobbing in the water and he turned me around and he guided me right to where he was,” said Leipelt. Lesh and his passenger Kayla climbed on the wing, eventually bobbing in the ocean after the plane sank. #NEW The last time David Lesh saw any part of his Beech Craft Bonanza. #abc7now pic.twitter.com/FA3rSKbSMb— Amanda del Castillo (@AmandaABC7) August 21, 2019 The U.S. Coast Guard was stationed in nearby El Granada and was guided to the crash site thanks to Leipelt’s position. “What was truly amazing about tonight was there was another aircraft on-scene that quickly responded, contacted air traffic control who knew to contact airborne Coast Guard asset and get us on-scene quickly,” said Lt. Commander Joshua Murphy. The Coast Guard team got Lesh and Kayla safely to Stanford Hospital for an evaluation.Lesh blamed bad gasoline for the engine failure, the Associated Press reported.KGO contributed to this report. 1765

(KGTV) - Days after her royal wedding to Prince Harry, the Duchess of Sussex has been bestowed her very own coat of arms, Kensington Palace announced.With personal touches such as poppies representing her home state of California and wintersweet which surrounds her new home at Kensington Palace, Meghan Markle's coat of arms was designed to be both personal and representative.A blue background on the shield is meant to represent the Pacific Ocean and two golden rays signify the sunshine of California. Three quills on the shield represent communication and the power of words.RELATED: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Duke and Duchess of Sussex, release official Royal Wedding photosOn each side of the shield are "supporters," which include a songbird and lion wearing a crown for Markle.For wives of members of the royal family, it's tradition to have one of the supporters of their husbands in addition to their own. Markle's supporter is a songbird "as if flying and an open beak, which with the quill represents the power of communication."Markle worked closely with the College of Arms throughout the design process and her coat was approved by Queen Elizabeth.PHOTOS: Scenes from Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's?royal wedding"Good heraldic design is nearly always simple and the Arms of The Duchess of Sussex stand well beside the historic beauty of the quartered British Royal Arms," Thomas Woodcock, Garter King of Arms and Senior Herald in England, said. 1511

(CNN) -- In a landmark ruling, a court in Mexico City has said two people should be allowed to use cocaine legally.The ruling means the unnamed pair can use, but not sell, small amounts of cocaine, according to Mexico United Against Crime (MUCD), an NGO that filed legal papers in the case as part of its strategy to change the country's drug policy.This is the first time cocaine use has been made legal in Mexico, but the ruling still needs to be ratified by a higher court.It comes at a time when Mexico is grappling with its drug policy under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, whose official development plan for 2019-2024 pledges to reform a "prohibitionist approach" that it calls "unsustainable" due to the "violence and poor public health outcomes" it has generated.The court ruling orders Mexico's national health regulator, Cofepris, to authorize two people to legally possess, transport and use cocaine.However, a Cofepris official told the AFP news agency that such an authorization is outside its remit, and it has blocked the court order as a result.The order was delivered in May but will now be reviewed by a tribunal, according to AFP.In a statement, MUCD emphasizes that the ruling will only be enforced if it is upheld by the tribunal, and underlines that it does not legalize cocaine.The organization said the ruling marks a new stage in the judiciary's understanding of drugs and offers an opportunity to call for an end to the war on drugs and the redistribution of public resources to fight other crimes."We have spent years working for a more secure, just and peaceful Mexico," said Lisa Sánchez, MUCD's director."This case is about insisting on the need to stop criminalizing users of drugs... and design better public policies that explore all the available options, including regulation."Mexico is a major transit point for cocaine en route to the United States, and trafficking gangs have grown in size and power thanks to the vast profits of the trade.The country's war on drugs began in 2006, when then-President Felipe Calderón sent in the army to fight traffickers.According to a 2018 US Congressional Research Service report, "many sources indicate" that about 150,000 intentional homicides in Mexico since 2006 were linked to organized crime.In 2018, Mexico recorded 33,341 homicides, the highest number since the country began keeping records.MUCD wants the government to reform drug policy as a way of improving public security and has also campaigned for changes to legislation on marijuana.In 2017, marijuana was legalized for medical and scientific purposes, and in November 2018 the Supreme Court ruled that a blanket ban on recreational use was unconstitutional, Reuters reports.That same month, López Obrador's government submitted a bill that would allow recreational use and create a medical marijuana industry, according to Reuters.For now, Cofepris grants permits to use marijuana on an individual basis.Gunther Baumgarten, editor at consultancy firm Latin News and Canning House associate, told CNN that any potential advance through the judicial system is likely to be a slow process.It took three years for the marijuana case to reach Mexico's supreme court, and judges could decide cocaine poses too much of a public health risk, he said.Plus, there is less of an economic incentive to act on cocaine than marijuana."In the case of marijuana there is already an international legal market but there is no such thing for cocaine," said Baumgarten.And López Obrador could be discouraged after calculating the political risk."He might get into some rocky territory," said Baumgarten, explaining that a majority of Mexicans were against the legalization of marijuana."It's not necessarily popular."Baumgarten also said "it's not clear" whether decriminalizing cocaine use would improve public security, as such a measure wouldn't affect drug smuggling to the US, which is the main driver of violence. 3959

(KGTV) — A San Diego woman’s mother who disappeared in Zion National Park nearly two weeks ago has been found alive, according to her family.Holly Courtier, 38, was last seen entering the Utah park on Oct. 6, before she was reported missing by her family.The National Park Service said search and rescue teams located Courtier on Sunday after receiving, "a credible tip from a park visitor that they had seen Courtier within the park."RELATED: San Diego woman’s mother missing in Zion National Park 506

来源：资阳报