罗山哪里有算命准的(曲周哪里有算命的师傅) (今日更新中)

RAMONA, Calif. (KGTV) - Residents in Ramona are worried that SANDAG's new transportation plan could put their lives at risk in the event of a wildfire.The proposed 2021 Regional Plan, which hasn't been approved and won't be voted on until November, would move tax money away from freeways like State Route 67, and put more emphasis on transit.People in Ramona say that worries them, because the 67 was jammed the last few times fires forced an evacuation."It took a couple hours to get down to Scripps Poway Parkway," says Ramona resident Paul Pakus, who had to evacuate during 2007's Witch Fire.In 2004, voters approved a measure on the ballot for a 40 year, half-cent sales tax to fund transportation projects, commonly called the "TransNet Tax." Part of the bill specifically mentioned State Route 67, as well as a handful of other freeways.When SANDAG unveiled their new transportation plan last month, they said Transnet tax money would now go to pay for transit projects instead of freeways. That means a proposed expansion of the 67 could be shelved if the plan is approved by the SANDAG Board."It's a bait-and-switch," says County Supervisor Jim Desmond, who sits on the Board. "People in Ramona are very sensitive to this. They want to make sure they're safe in a fire and they want to make sure that the infrastructure is in place to do that."SANDAG says the TransNet Tax ballot proposition included language that allows SANDAG to change where the tax money goes as priorities change over time.Executive Director Hasan Ikhrata says, even after just 11 years of the tax, it's clear San Diego needs to invest more in mass transit and less in roads. He says that's a necessity if the area wants to hit state and federal mandates for greenhouse gas emission."People need to give us a chance and time to put this forth. And once we do, I think they will be more pleased with what we're telling them," says Ikhrata.He also assured 10News that SR-67 would still be a priority."Safety will be addressed, period," he told 10News in an exclusive interview. "The 67 safety issue will take top priority."Ikrata added that the plan is still a work in progress and SANDAG wants feedback from the public. They have a "Vision Lab" at their downtown offices that people can visit to give feedback.They also plan to form an advisory council, made up of at least 10 industry experts and leaders, to help finalize the 2021 Regional Plan. They're asking people who are interested to look over the qualifications and submit an application here. 2540

RANCHO CORDOVA, Calif. (AP) — Gov. Gavin Newsom says he wants a Southern California county to reimpose stay-home orders amid a surge in positive coronavirus tests there and through much of the state. Imperial County, with a population of 175,000 people on the state’s border with Mexico, has been the slowest in the state to reopen. "Some counties, like Imperial, haven't been able to move into that attestation process, because they can't meet that criteria," Newsom said of the county's struggle to reopen. "We reserve the right to toggle back if we don't see movement at the local level."Newsom said the state is working with the county to send additional resources to help local officials address coronavirus cases. Despite this, the governor said interventions are not making enough of an impact, leading to reinstituting the stay-at-home order.The county's positivity rate has averaged 23% in the last week, compared with 5.7 % percent statewide. Newsom said there is also a need to decompress the county's hospital system, which other counties have helped do by accepting patients."I just sent 76 ventilators down to Imperial County. We are in the midst of the first wave of this pandemic. We are not out of the first wave. This disease does not take a summer vacation," Newsom said. Newsom added that he's awaiting a CDC study to determine if outside cases — for example, in hotspot Arizona — have contributed to the rise in cases in Imperial County.The Imperial Valley provides many of the vegetables in U.S. supermarkets during winter. 1553

President Donald Trump spent Thursday grappling with how to prevent more school massacres and address the gun debate gripping the country, offering solutions such as giving bonuses to teachers who undergo gun training."These people are cowards. They're not going to walk into a school if 20% of the teachers have guns -- it may be 10% or may be 40%. And what I'd recommend doing is the people that do carry, we give them a bonus. We give them a little bit of a bonus," Trump said. "They'll frankly feel more comfortable having the gun anyway. But you give them a little bit of a bonus."He repeated his suggestion that some teachers get trained to handle firearms as a deterrent to shooters and disparaged "gun-free zones.""I don't want teachers to have guns. I want certain highly adept people -- people that understand weaponry, guns. If they really have that aptitude -- because not everybody has aptitude for gun -- but if they have the aptitude, I think a concealed permit for having teachers and letting people know that there are people in the building with guns, you won't have -- in my opinion -- you won't have these shootings," the President said.Gun-free zones, meanwhile, are appealing to criminals, he said."We have to harden those schools, not soften them. A gun-free zone, to a killer, or somebody that wants to be a killer, that's like going in for the ice cream. That's like saying, 'Here I am, take me,' " Trump said at the White House."They see that as such a beautiful target," Trump said. "They live for gun-free zones."He also disparaged school shooting drills, saying they were tough on the kids."Active shooter drills is a very negative thing, I'll be honest with you," he said. "I think that's a very negative thing to be talking about. I don't like it. I don't want to tell my son 'you're going to have to participate in an active shooter drill. I'd much rather have a hardened school."Trump also promoted the idea of increasing the age limit of those who can purchase semi-automatic rifles from age 18 to age 21 as well as looking at the possibility of committing people like the Florida shooter to mental institutions."I said this yesterday when we had a mental institution where you take a sicko like this guy -- he was a sick guy, so many signs -- and you bring him to a mental health institution, those institutions are largely closed because communities didn't want him," Trump said.The President also blamed violence in video games and movies as partly responsible for shaping young people's thoughts."They're so violent," Trump said.The-CNN-Wire? & ? 2018 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. 2671

President Donald Trump's ex-wife Ivana doesn't think he should run for reelection in 2020. In an interview with Page Six, Ivana Trump said her ex-husband should instead enjoy his fortunes. “I’ll tell you something, I don’t think it’s necessary,” she told Page Six. “He has a good life and he has everything. Donald is going to be 74, 73 for the next [election] and maybe he should just go and play golf and enjoy his fortune."Ivana Trump was married to Donald from 1977 to 1992. The couple had three children: Eric, Donald Jr. and Ivanka. Despite being divorced for 26 years, Ivana remains in close contact with the President, saying they talk at least once a month. Ivana Trump believes her ex-husband probably misses some of the freedoms he had before entering the White House. "I don’t think he probably knew how much is involved of being the President," she told Page Six. "It’s so [much] information — you have to know the whole world.”Ivana Trump added during the interview that she feels for Trump's current wife Melania as speculation swirls around Trump's sex life, and his alleged relationship with porn star Stormy Daniels. "I feel bad for [Melania] because I know how bad I did feel. It hurts a lot,” she told Page Six.During their 15-year marriage, Ivana said she never suspected Donald of cheating on her. “Donald was always in the office and coming home, so I had no idea how he had the time to cheat,” she told Page Six. To see the full interview, click here.  1564

President Donald Trump's administration plans to propose a new rule Friday that would bar abortions at facilities receiving federal family planning funds, according to two people familiar with the plans -- a move aimed squarely at Planned Parenthood, which accepts some federal money for non-abortion services.Long sought by conservatives, the step would take the administration's push to curtail abortions further. There are already laws in place that prevent federal money from directly funding abortions, but groups like Planned Parenthood still accept federal dollars for services like annual screenings and checkups."This proposal does not necessarily defund Planned Parenthood, as long as they're willing to disentangle taxpayer funds from abortion as a method of family planning, which is required by the Title X law," said a Trump administration official. "Any grantees that perform, support, or refer for abortion have a choice -- disentangle themselves from abortion or fund their activities with privately raised funds."Under the new rule, those services would have to be performed in a different place than abortions, and by different employees, if the facility is to continue receiving federal family planning dollars.Planned Parenthood receives some of its funding from those programs, known as Title X. But the bulk of the federal money it receives comes from Medicaid, and would not be affected by the new rule.The-CNN-Wire 1447

来源：资阳报