常德市怀孕8个月还可以做四维彩超吗常德市怀孕几个月做四维,常德市怀孕有必要做四维b超吗,常德市怀孕几周可以做四维,常德市怀孕多久做四维检查,常德市怀孕照四维,常德市怀孕十八周四维彩超,常德市怀孕38周四维彩超

IHOP is introducing its own twist to Happy Hour by launching IHOPPY Hour.On Monday, the pancake place launched the new happy hour menu, which occurs between 2-10 p.m. each day."We created IHOPPY Hour as a way to provide folks with affordable opportunities to pancake together under our blue roof even more often,” said Jay Johns, President at IHOP in the press release. “We recognize that these are challenging times, and our belief is that, regardless of what’s going on in the world, we all deserve a little happiness, or ‘hoppiness’ as we like call it. By offering these fan-favorite menu items at unbeatable prices seven days a week, we hope to make every day just a little hoppier.”Customers will be able to choose popular menu items, entrees, snacks, sides, and drinks, and nothing will cost more than . 819

Immunotherapy has gained ground against a stubborn opponent: ovarian cancer. A personalized cancer vaccine is safe and may lengthen the lives of ovarian cancer patients, a small clinical trial found.The research, published Wednesday in the journal Science Translational Medicine, showed "significantly higher" overall survival at two years among patients who received the vaccine, compared with patients who did not.Ovarian cancer is a "silent killer" because often it goes unnoticed until it is diagnosed at a late stage. Treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy, most patients -- 85% -- relapse and ultimately develop resistance to the chemo. At this point, they run out of treatment options.Still, scientists are hopeful based on the fact that a subset of patients shows an immune response to their cancer. Generally, these patients have better survival rates than those whose immune systems don't react in the same way.A vaccine, then, might be able to trigger and boost the immune system and increase the survival rates of patients, said Dr. Lana Kandalaft, senior author of the new study and an adjunct assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.  1210

In a 5-4 decision announced Monday, the Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that severely restricted abortion in the state, marking a win for abortion rights advocates.Chief Justice John Roberts, a crucial conservative swing vote, sided with liberal Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan in issuing the majority opinion.According to The Associated Press, Roberts has favored restrictions on abortion in two previous Supreme Court rulings.The decision strikes down a Louisiana law that would have required physicians who perform abortions to also have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion clinic. The law would have reduced the number of physicians in the state who were legally permitted to conduct an abortion to one.The law was nearly identical to a Texas law that was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in a 2016 decision.This story is breaking and will be updated. 933

In an interview with ABC News and the Louisville Courier-Journal, one of the Louisville police officers involved in the raid that led to the death of Breonna Taylor claims his team knocked on Taylor's door six times and said the fatal shooting could have been avoided if officers did not allow time for Taylor and her boyfriend to come to the door.Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly spoke with ABC News and the Courier-Journal for two hours on Tuesday — the same day a grand juror spoke publicly about the case for the first time. Mattingly said police officers believed that Taylor was the only person in the apartment when they served the no-knock warrant on her apartment."We expected that Breonna was going to be there by herself. That's why we gave her so much time. And in my opinion, that was a mistake," Mattingly told ABC News.He said if he could have done anything differently that evening, officers would have breached Taylor's apartment without giving time for her or her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, to react."What would I have done differently, the answer to that is simple now that I've been thinking about it. Number one, we would have either served the no-knock warrant or we would have done the normal thing we do, which is five to 10 seconds. To not give people time to formulate a plan, not give people time to get their senses so they have an idea of what they're doing. Because if that had happened, Breonna Taylor would be alive, 100 percent."Mattingly claims officers involved in the raid knocked on Taylor's door six different times."So we get up, I remember banging on the door, it's open hand, hard smack, bam, bam, bam, bam. First time, didn't announce. Just hoping she would come to the door," Mattingly said.He also claims that at one point, they "repeatedly" yelled "police, search warrant!"Walker and 11 other people interviewed by police said they did not hear officers identify themselves. Only one other person in the apartment complex corroborated police claims that they identified themselves.Walker says he assumed the police officers were intruders and grabbed his gun to protect himself and Taylor. When officers breached Taylor's door, Walker fired at them. Mattingly was the only officer injured during the shooting."As soon as I felt the smack on my leg and the heat, I — boom, boom — returned four return shots, four shots," he said. "I reached down and felt my leg. I could feel a handful of blood and the heat — I thought my femoral artery. I said I can't stand up because I'm going to pump the blood out if I keep pushing forward."Mattingly also took issue with Walker's claim that he fired a "warning shot," saying that his stance indicated that he was ready to fire at officers.Mattingly was able to limp out of the apartment and was later taken to the hospital. He didn't learn of Taylor's death until he got out of surgery the next day."My first question was, 'Did she have a gun? Was she a shooter?' Because I didn't know what took place after I moved out," Mattingly said."I feel for her. I hurt for her mother and for her sisters," he added. "It's not just a passing 'Oh, this is part of the job, we did it and move on.' It's not like that. I mean Breonna Taylor is now attached to me for the rest of my life. And that's not again, 'Woe is me.' That's me feeling for them. That's me having a heart and a soul, going as a parent, 'How do you move on?' I don't know. I don't want to experience it."Taylor's case has become a touchstone case across the country amid a summer of unrest. For months, protests took place nightly in Louisville as demonstrators called for justice.Mattingly told ABC News that despite calls for police reform to address questions of systemic racism, Taylor's shooting had nothing to do with her race."It's not a race thing like people want to try to make it out to be. It's not. This is a point where we were doing our job, we gave too much time when we go in, I get shot, we returned fire," Mattingly said. "This is not us going, hunting somebody down. This is not kneeling on a neck. It's nothing like that."Mattingly and his fellow officers will not face homicide charges in connection with Taylor's death. Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, who led the investigation, claims officers were justified in their actions because Walker fired at them.Mattingly's interview came the same day that a grand juror in Taylor's case spoke publicly and claimed that he and others on the grand jury were not given the opportunity to consider homicide charges against the police officers.Only one police officer, Brett Hankison, faces charges in connection with the case. He's charged with endangering Taylor's neighbors by firing his gun at the building.In the days leading up to the grand jury decision, Mattingly sent an email to hundreds of his coworkers criticizing the city's mayor and other officials for their handling of the case."It's sad how the good guys are demonized, and criminals are canonized," Mattingly said in the email. "Put that aside for a while keep your focus and do your jobs that you are trained and capable of doing." 5115

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Maryland, introduced legislation Friday that establishes a Congressional commission that would be able to investigate a President's health under the 25th Amendment.While President Donald Trump's health has come into question following his COVID-19 diagnosis, Pelosi and Raskin insisted that while Trump's health prompted their bill, it would not be used to remove him from office.Instead, Raskin said the commission would be a bipartisan effort that would be set up in case the health of other presidents came into question.Passed in 1967, the 25th amendment to the U.S. Constitution spells out the presidential line of succession.The amendment has four sections:1- When a president dies or resigns, the vice president finishes the term.2- When there is a vice presidential vacancy, the House and Senate votes to confirm a replacement nominated by the president.3 - When a president needs to temporarily cede power, he or she can hand the duties to the vice president who then becomes the acting president.4 - The vice president and a majority of secretaries can vote to remove the president if the president is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. The section also grants power to a body "established by Congress" to invoke the amendment and transfer power to the Vice President.Raskin said his bill would establish that "body" that could investigate the health of the president. For Congress to invoke the 25th Amendment, the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate must provide "written declaration" that the President is "unable to discharge powers and duties of his office." Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is the current President pro tempore and will unlikely make such a declaration. In addition, the President could object to the Congressional body's findings. Reports surfaced later on Thursday that the House is planning to introduce legislation to institute a commission to evaluate the president's health.Pelosi then criticized the White House for not stating the president last submitted a negative coronavirus.“I think that the public needs to know the health condition of the President. There’s one question they refuse to answer. Before he got the virus and admitted to it, when was his last negative test? When was his last negative test? To make a judgment on the actions that were taken after that,” Pelosi said.Editor's note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that Congress has no authority to remove the president under the 25th Amendment. 2582