阜阳痤疮专治那家医院好(蚌埠糠疹) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — City officials hope to get the construction process for a proposed downtown park, aimed at being an anchor for San Diego's East Village, off the ground this summer.The proposed 4.1-acre, million East Village Green will sit between F and G Streets stretching from 13th St. to 15th St. The massive stretch of green space in the heart of downtown San Diego will feature an 11,000-square-foot multi-use lawn, plaza and fountain areas, children's garden, 14,200-square-foot community center, dog parks, and room for food facilities, according to development plans.RELATED: Officials to break ground on county's first bike skills park in South BayThe green would also include an underground parking structure for 200 vehicles. "The City will be maintaining and programming East Village Green, and Civic [San Diego] hopes to start the bid solicitation process in late summer," according to Kimberly Moore with Civic San Diego. Plans show an additional multi-use lawn, children's garden, and casual park space in the park's future. Part of the construction process will also involve restoring nearby historic homes, which sit at the corner of F and 15th Streets. RELATED: New park includes San Diego's first public parkour spaceThe city hopes to begin construction by early 2021. Renderings and phase development plans can be seen here.Officials say the park has the ability to serve as a way to give East Village's residents an "engaging and interactive" place for community events and daily use. 1520

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Body-worn cameras are now in widespread use across San Diego County.They catch some of the most controversial and impactful moments of police officer interactions with the public.As part of the Team 10 Transparency Project, 10News set out to learn more about local departments policies and what type of impact the cameras are having in the community."Body-worn camera, in my opinion, is just another piece of evidence to what occurred," said San Diego County Sheriff's Department Sergeant Rob Samuels.Under Senate Bill 1421, a recent law enforcement transparency law, the San Diego County Sheriff's Department released a handful of body-worn camera recordings.The recordings are the end product, capturing moments that could be used in court to prosecute a suspect, exonerate a member of law enforcement or sue a department.But to get to that end, departments have laid out policies that guide how and when to use the cameras."Whenever a deputy is anticipating they are going to be taking some enforcement action they should be turning it on," Samuels said.The Sheriff's Department policy is only a few pages, but it covers everything from training to camera position, when and where to record, and rules for reviewing that video.According to the policy, "Deputies/community services officers shall activate the [body worn camera] BWC to record all law enforcement related contacts. While away from department facilities, deputies shall keep their BWC powered on and in stand-by mode."MORE LIKE THIS Police expert says improvements needed in law enforcement complaint processExclusive: How San Diego law enforcement responds to mental health crisesInvestigating Officers: How SDPD investigates its own after an officer-Involved shootingAccording to the policy, deputies will typically not allow citizens to review recordings; however, deputy discretion is allowed to replay the recording for citizens at the scene to mitigate possible minor complaints."On average, we see about 60 minutes of recording per camera per day and at any given time and point we have about 250 cameras out in the field," said San Diego County Sheriff's Department Chief Information Officer Ashish Kakkad.Kakkad said deputies are allowed to review only their body camera recordings. Access is extremely limited.The policy states, "A deputy may not review the BWC video of other involved deputies before writing a report or giving a statement unless necessary for evidentiary purposes and with the express permission of a supervisor."It's very much a role-based access," Kakkad said. "What is your role? What are you doing? What is your function? And based on your function, your appropriate access is determined."Kakkad said no deputy has the power to edit or delete video.In the two years, the body-worn camera program has been up and running, the department hasn't deleted any video, he said.The heads of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department's program believe it's been a good thing.But are cameras doing anything to bridge the gap between the public and the people they serve?"You won't really ever know what it may have prevented in the way of a complaint," Samuels said.Numbers do show substantiated and unsubstantiated complaints are down for the Sheriff's Department.10News wanted to see if body cameras had an impact on how San Diego County law enforcement interacts with the public.Team 10 requested use of force data dating back five years from departments across the county.Use of force is the type of action law enforcement uses to mitigate an incident, make an arrest, or protect themselves or others from harm.Here's what we found from departments that have responded to our request at the time of this writing.Oceanside initially saw a significant increase in use of force in 2018 when the cameras were deployed. Although officials tell us it was a staggered deployment. So far this year, use of force numbers show a significant decrease.In the three years since El Cajon deployed body-worn cameras use of force increased. The department said use of force numbers could increase for several reasons, and there also may be no direct correlation between those numbers and body-worn cameras. In San Diego, a 2017 report noted that since officers began wearing body cameras, there were fewer instances of greater controlling/defending force, a reduction in complaints and allegations, and de-escalation of some situations.While statistics vary, the Sheriff's Department said the cameras are just another tool."We still do business like we've always done business, we write accurate reports, and the video we record on body-worn camera just supports what the deputy writes," Samuels said. 4707

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) – County leaders are continuing to urge San Diegans that 2020 is not the year to skip the flu shot as we head into colder months amid a nearly year-long pandemic.On Wednesday, the fourth of six flu vaccine clinics was held by San Diego County’s Health and Human Services in Logan Heights. All hands were on deck with nurses from across the county, as more people are heading to the free clinics to get their flu shot this season."This is a year to be vigilant of protecting yourself from influenza and getting a vaccine, so we don't run into a situation where people are not only getting COVID, but getting influenza, and clogging our medical response system," said Thomas Zurek, public health nurse manager with the county.Zurek said while we can't control the spread of COVID-19 with a vaccine, we can when it comes to the spread of influenza, which hits hard during cold months when more people are indoors.Zurek added he hopes the free clinics will help keep people out of hospitals this season so staff can focus patients affected by COVID-19."Our numbers have been above what we're normally than seeing this time of year, which is great," Zurek said.The county will hold two more vaccine clinics Thursday and next Tuesday:Thursday, Oct. 29, at East Public Health Center, 367 N. Magnolia Avenue, El CajonTuesday, Nov. 3, at North Inland Public Health Center, 640 W. Mission Ave #2, Escondido 1421

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Congress is considering a bill that will push for more transparency in the online event ticketing industry. Included in the reforms would be a mandate that companies disclose the full cost of each ticket, including additional fees, up front.In the current environment, most ticket sites show only the cost of the ticket up front, but add the fees after the customer has begun the process of purchasing the tickets.San Diego Congressman Scott Peters is on the committee considering the bill and questioned leaders from the major ticketing companies during a congressional hearing Wednesday. RELATED: ESPN: Ticket sellers support mandate to show upfront fees"The main thing is that you should know going in what the fees are that you're going to pay," Peters told 10News. The hearing included representatives from Ticketmaster, Stubhub, and AXS.Other contentious issues being considered by lawmakers include battling ticket fraud, transfer of tickets once purchased, and the accusations that companies withhold putting many of the tickets on sale at one time in order to create a false sense of demand and artificially cause the ticket prices to increase.Peters says he thinks Congress will be able to pass a strong bill to create more transparency. "There was a lot of agreement about what we should do in Congress, even among the companies. They'd like to have us set rules that everyone could abide by," Peters said. 1444

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Chief Border Patrol Agent Douglas Harrison apologized Wednesday after a binational garden at the border was bulldozed. Harrison said on Twitter he met with Friends of Friendship Park and apologized for the “unintentional destruction of the garden.”“The original intent was to have the garden trimmed. We take full responsibility, are investigating the event, & look forward to working with FoFP on the path forward,” Harrison continued. RELATED: Woman tries to smuggle meth with 7-year-old in car, Border Patrol saysEarlier in the month, Harrison said the binational garden was being used to cover for illegal activities happening at the border. “Measures had to be taken to eliminate the vulnerability.”More specifically, Harrison said the border fence adjacent to the garden was compromised, modified and the garden was being used as a cover to hide smuggling activities. RELATED: Border Patrol arrests 5, including convicted child predator, in East County“The Imperial Beach Station took measures to eliminate that vulnerability,” a statement posted by Harrison on Twitter read. 1114

来源：资阳报