南昌什么方法能治疗花柳病(南昌九三医院龟头红是什么情况) (今日更新中)

We cannot stay silent as this lawless President recklessly moves us closer to yet another unnecessary war that puts innocent lives at risk at home & across the globe. Congress alone has the authority to declare war, & we must reclaim our responsibility & say no to war with Iran.— Rashida Tlaib (@RashidaTlaib) January 3, 2020 350

WARNING: Some viewers may find some of the content in this video difficult to watch. Three years ago, Lee Brook went on a hunting trip with family in the mountains of Wyoming. One day, while hauling elk back to his camp, Brook encountered a grizzly bear.Before Brook's could react, the grizzly started to attack him. During the attack, Brook says he remembered saying to himself, "Lord I can use a little help about now. Not really understanding he'd already been at work, because I'm alive."Brook, whose face was disfigured in the gruesome incident, is still recovering.He says he lost consciousness during the attack. When he awoke, Brook could hear the bear sniffing him. He recalls reaching for his knife and stabbing the bear, before quickly making his escape. Badly injured, Brook says he saw his nose on the ground. He quickly grabbed it, put it in his pocket and ran, screaming for help. Brook was flown to Swedish Medical Center in Denver, Colorado, where he was placed into a coma for 30 days. Miraculously, Brook lived. Then, his remarkable facial reconstruction journey began. Plastic surgeons Dr. Lily Daniali and Dr. Benson Pulikkottil--a husband and wife duo who work at the hospital’s burn and reconstructive center--were in charge of reconstructing Brook’s face. Areas of Brook’s face that sustained the most damage were his nose and upper lip. Fortunately, doctors had Brook’s nose. "Ultimately, we took a chance to see if it would take, which it did," says Dr. Pulikkottil. But how the doctors were able to save his nose is a miracle within itself. The surgeons sewed Brook’s nose to his forearm to keep it alive. Meanwhile, Brook underwent dozens of surgeries. Doctors used cartilage and tissue from all over his body to put his face back together. Using skin from his legs, the surgeons created a new upper lip for Brook. Hair on his head was used to create a mustache. This week, the surgeons were finally able to reattach Brook’s nose to his face. They say the surgery was successful and Brook is doing well. “I'm super proud of him, super proud," says Brook’s wife, Martha, who has been his side through it all.The Brooks have kept their spirits bright, but there’s one thing Brook says he’ll miss the most about his old life. “I'll never feel my wife kiss,” Brook says. “I'll never. That's probably the biggest one for me."Following the surgery, Brook lost the ability to feel in some places of his face. However, his wife says the most important thing is her husband is the same person. “The whole fact that the way he looks is not his focus, and he’s still the [same] Lee,” she says. A 2625

WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court has largely upheld the Federal Communications Commission's controversial repeal of its net neutrality rules for internet providers, finding the agency didn't overreach when it decided in 2018 to deregulate companies such as Comcast and Verizon.The decision marks a victory for the Republican-led commission in light of opposition by consumer groups, tech companies and local government officials who had sued the agency in a years-long battle over the future of the open internet.But there is an important caveat: The court struck down a key aspect of the agency's order that could lead to further battles at the state level.Tuesday's opinion by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit is a win for the broadband industry, which had argued the regulations created uncertainty for internet providers and were too restrictive. But the decision also handed a partial victory to net neutrality advocates in that it provides a path for states to create their own net neutrality rules.Both sides were quick to declare victory.In a statement Tuesday, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said the decision is a win "for consumers, broadband deployment, and the free and open Internet." He added: "A free and open Internet is what we have today and what we'll continue to have moving forward."Democratic FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, a net neutrality advocate, cheered the court's decision as it "vacates the FCC's unlawful effort to block states and localities from protecting an open internet for their citizens."For years, consumer groups have pushed for tough net neutrality rules. Advocates say providers should not be allowed to slow down websites, block access to apps or give faster service to preferred partners, which could distort the market for online services. Under those principles, Verizon, for example, would not be allowed to speed up loading times for, say, Yahoo, which it owns. Similarly, Spectrum could not downgrade Netflix as a way to deter cord-cutting.In light of the decision, Mozilla, maker of the Firefox browser and one of the lead plaintiffs in the case, said the fight to preserve the principle of net neutrality "is far from over."Consumer groups succeeded in 2015 when the FCC decided to regulate internet providers much like legacy telephone companies. The agency imposed clear rules banning the blocking, throttling or accelerating of Web content by internet providers and reserved the right to investigate business practices that risked violating the spirit of net neutrality.Opponents charged that the rules were a gross overreach by the government. Industry groups argued the constant danger of FCC investigations created business uncertainty and the rules opened the door to direct federal regulation of broadband prices.When President Trump took the White House, Republicans gained control of the FCC. Among the first acts Pai took as the new chairman was a plan to unwind the rules. Pai argued that the net neutrality regulations were heavy-handed and discouraged internet providers from upgrading their networks. In 2017, the FCC voted to repeal major parts of the rules, including the bans on blocking and slowing of websites.Internet providers say they are not interested in blocking or slowing down websites anyway.USTelecom, an association representing broadband providers, said the litigation showed how "Congress must end this regulatory rinse and repeat cycle by passing a strong national framework that applies to all companies."But internet providers have lobbied for the freedom to strike deals with websites to provide premium service, possibly in exchange for extra fees.Some policymakers have argued that practice, known as "paid prioritization," could benefit advanced applications like self-driving cars and telemedicine. Critics worry it could become an unbearable cost for some websites and tech companies — giving wealthy, established firms the power to dominate while marginalizing smaller businesses that can't afford to pay.Those arguments figured prominently in the legal battle over net neutrality. A coalition of critics led by Mozilla sued the FCC in hopes of blocking Pai's deregulation.The case was decided with the panel's three judges concluding the FCC acted lawfully when it decided to undo the Obama-era rules and regulate internet providers more lightly.But the opinion also struck down efforts by the FCC to prevent state governments from enacting their own net neutrality laws and regulations. The court on Tuesday rejected that approach, saying it amounted to an attempt to "categorically abolish all fifty States' ... authority to regulate intrastate communications." The FCC could still seek to preempt states on a case-by-case basis, setting the stage for multiple legal tussles.Andy Schwartzman, a lecturer in law at Georgetown University, said the decision "provides a roadmap to rules that can protect the promise of a vibrant internet that serves people, not the big cable and telcom companies." 5018

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has announced that Vice President Mike Pence will be “in charge” of the administration’s response to the coronavirus outbreak. Trump made the announcement Wednesday during a press conference with officials from the Centers Disease Control and Prevention. During the presser, the president said the United States is “very, very ready” for whatever the new coronavirus threat brings. Trump assured the public that the risk to Americans is “very low” and that his task force is effectively handling the outbreak. That’s despite the CDC saying the day before that it seems inevitable that the virus will begin to spread in U.S. communities.Trump also addressed the negotiations over the funding that will be allocated to combat the virus. Originally, the White House requested .5 billion, but lawmakers are calling for much more. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has asked for .5 billion. Wednesday, Trump indicated that he’d be open to more spending.“We’re going to spend whatever’s appropriate,” Trump told reporters. Dr. Anne Schuchat, the principal deputy director of the CDC, also spoke during the presser. She said the government’s aggressive containment strategy has been working and it’s responsible for the low levels of cases in U.S. so far. However, she said officials do expect more cases and it’s a good time to prepare. “As you heard, it’s the perfect time for businesses, health care systems, universities and schools to look at their pandemic preparedness plans,” said Schuchat. “Dust them off and make sure they’re ready.” 1594

US rapper A$AP Rocky will find out if he has been found guilty of assault over a street brawl in Stockholm when a Swedish court delivers its judgment on Wednesday.The performer and two members of his entourage were taken into custody on July 3, following a confrontation in the Swedish capital on June 30.Swedish public prosecutor Daniel Suneson told the court the artist and the two other men -- David Rispers and Bladimir Corniel -- assaulted the victim by kicking and beating him with a whole or part of a glass bottle while he lay on the ground.A$AP Rocky, who pleaded not guilty to the charges against him, argued that the trio were simply defending themselves.Known for his song "Praise the Lord," the 30-year-old rapper -- whose real name is Rakim Mayers -- was released by Swedish authorities at the conclusion of the trial on August 2 and left the country shortly afterwards.He is not required to appear in court for Wednesday's ruling.The incident angered fans and fellow artists, and strained diplomatic relations with the United States after President Donald Trump repeatedly demanded the rapper's release, even raising the issue with Swedish Prime Minister Stefan L?fven.In response, L?fven's spokesperson Mikael Lindstr?m said in a statement to CNN at the time that "the Government is not allowed, and will not attempt, to influence the legal proceedings, which are now ongoing."Swedish officials repeatedly stressed that the country's judiciary is "completely independent" and "does not take into consideration outside pressure from politicians or others."The rapper addressed the case during a performance at a music festival in California on Sunday, 1679

来源：资阳报